A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 26th 04, 02:57 AM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Dude
wrote:

The Cirrus fleet has enough hours now that the stats actually mean
something. They have not found and corrected any major flaw except to fix
the parachute. If I am going to buy a plane with a parachute, I certainly
don't want it to be because the plane would be otherwise unsafe.


Let's be very clear on this, the BRS/CAPS is there because the FAA
requires it.
The FAA requires it because the airplane has not passed spin
certification.
The BRS/CAPS is the FAA's alternative to spin recovery certification.
  #2  
Old April 25th 04, 10:42 PM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Mike Murdock
wrote:

No less an authority than Richard Collins of "Flying" magazine disagrees
with you. In the May, 2004 issue, he said that the safety record of Cirrus
airplanes has been "about the same" as those of Cessna 182s manufactured
between 2000 and 2003. He also said, "That's good, really good, because the
182 has always had the best safety record of any piston airplane used for
purposeful personal transportation."
Mr. Collins' article was a followup to his earlier article that was
questioning the safety of Cirrus aircraft.


You are forgetting that Collin's article was written in January (three
month lead time for publishing), prior to the current rash of
accidents.
  #3  
Old April 26th 04, 08:02 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Edr,

prior to the current rash of
accidents.


only one of which was fatal...

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #4  
Old April 26th 04, 01:10 PM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Thomas Borchert
wrote:

prior to the current rash of accidents.


Edr,
only one of which was fatal...


What is your point?
That it has to be a fatal to be an accident, and if there are no fatals
it doesn't count?
  #5  
Old April 26th 04, 04:04 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Edr,

That it has to be a fatal to be an accident, and if there are no fatals
it doesn't count?


it does - but I don't think the statistics make the Cirrus stand out for
non-fatals.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #6  
Old April 26th 04, 12:22 AM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Murdock" wrote in message
...
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
..
.
The fact is that the Cirrus currently owns one of the worst accident and
fatality rates of any small airplane.


This is an outrageous statement! Can you post any facts showing the
accident and fatality rates of Cirrus airplanes vs. comparable aircraft?

If
you examine the real numbers you will find that your statement is patently
false.

No less an authority than Richard Collins


Oh, my head aches after reading that statement.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
New Cirrus SR22 Lead Time Lenny Sawyer Owning 4 March 6th 04 09:22 AM
Fractional Ownership - Cirrus SR22 Rich Raine Owning 3 December 24th 03 05:36 AM
New Cessna panel C J Campbell Owning 48 October 24th 03 04:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.