![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dude
wrote: The Cirrus fleet has enough hours now that the stats actually mean something. They have not found and corrected any major flaw except to fix the parachute. If I am going to buy a plane with a parachute, I certainly don't want it to be because the plane would be otherwise unsafe. Let's be very clear on this, the BRS/CAPS is there because the FAA requires it. The FAA requires it because the airplane has not passed spin certification. The BRS/CAPS is the FAA's alternative to spin recovery certification. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mike Murdock
wrote: No less an authority than Richard Collins of "Flying" magazine disagrees with you. In the May, 2004 issue, he said that the safety record of Cirrus airplanes has been "about the same" as those of Cessna 182s manufactured between 2000 and 2003. He also said, "That's good, really good, because the 182 has always had the best safety record of any piston airplane used for purposeful personal transportation." Mr. Collins' article was a followup to his earlier article that was questioning the safety of Cirrus aircraft. You are forgetting that Collin's article was written in January (three month lead time for publishing), prior to the current rash of accidents. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edr,
prior to the current rash of accidents. only one of which was fatal... -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Thomas Borchert
wrote: prior to the current rash of accidents. Edr, only one of which was fatal... What is your point? That it has to be a fatal to be an accident, and if there are no fatals it doesn't count? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edr,
That it has to be a fatal to be an accident, and if there are no fatals it doesn't count? it does - but I don't think the statistics make the Cirrus stand out for non-fatals. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Murdock" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message .. . The fact is that the Cirrus currently owns one of the worst accident and fatality rates of any small airplane. This is an outrageous statement! Can you post any facts showing the accident and fatality rates of Cirrus airplanes vs. comparable aircraft? If you examine the real numbers you will find that your statement is patently false. No less an authority than Richard Collins Oh, my head aches after reading that statement. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
New Cirrus SR22 Lead Time | Lenny Sawyer | Owning | 4 | March 6th 04 09:22 AM |
Fractional Ownership - Cirrus SR22 | Rich Raine | Owning | 3 | December 24th 03 05:36 AM |
New Cessna panel | C J Campbell | Owning | 48 | October 24th 03 04:43 PM |