![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I recall, the pinto and others had the tank behind the rear axle
where it was susceptible to a rear-end collision. Airplanes don't hit tail first very often and don't get rear-ended all that often either. Ahh, but if you look at crash photos you will see that the wings and tail often break off. It you put in really serious fuel lines with break aways you may avoid this causing a fire, but the tank itself is still out there. What if you put the tank behind the seat, but not under it? Is that better to you? after all, you said you are not likely to get rear ended. You can come up with any solution you want to feel safe, and then tell us the aircraft you found that fits the bill. In the end, I don't think having it in the compartment is such a bad idea. And I am quite sure that few if any planes will meet your standards. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USS Liberty Challenge/Reward | Issac Goldberg | Naval Aviation | 75 | July 16th 04 09:28 PM |
USS LIBERTY CASE EVIDENCE JUSTIFIES REOPENING | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 0 | April 2nd 04 08:31 PM |
USS LIBERTY CASE EVIDENCE JUSTIFIES REOPENING | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 2nd 04 08:31 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 4 | February 21st 04 09:01 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 2 | February 12th 04 12:52 AM |