![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe you should only post when sober then... The original post states
"They just finished up an annual inspection on it." :-) Lynne Miller wrote: Truthfully, a good pre-buy is actually an annual inspection. I would worry about a $500 pre-buy. Unless you truly tear into the aircraft, you don't know what you're getting into. If it's at all close by, perhaps you could work out a deal to somehow pro-rate the annual inspection, and just get it done. That way, you will at least have the peace of mind to know exactly the shape the aircraft is in. As an aside, I am quite drunk right now. :-) It's fun to hang out at home, drink beers, and just relax. Lynne Jon Kraus wrote in message . .. My new partner and I are looking at a 1975 Mooney M20C. It is a nicely upgraded IFR plane with a 400 hour O-360 engine. It is a rather high time airplane (7000) hours and the price reflects this fact. It is being sold by the owner of the FBO we fly out of for one of his friends. They just finished up an annual inspection on it. My IFR instructor has owned Mooneys in the past and even had the M20C for years. He suggested that we fly the plane to Byerly Aviation in Peoria IL (a little over an hour flight from Indianapolis) and have them do the pre-buy. He said it would probably cost in the $500.00 range. My partner and I think it is a good idea too. We are both buying our first plane and think the money would be well spent. One of the cylinders has a compression of 62 while the others are in the 70's. This concerns me even though it is within tolerances. Of course we would hate to buy something that needed immediate major engine work. The plane has not flown much for the past 2 years so I am wondering if after flying the thing a while if the compression might come back some (probably wishful thinking I know). I am interested in opinions or experiences in first plane purchases. Experience with Byerly Aviation. Or comments on the engine situation I described. Thanks!! Jon Kraus PP-ASEL-IA Student aircraft purchaser |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Lynne Miller wrote: Truthfully, a good pre-buy is actually an annual inspection. I would worry about a $500 pre-buy. I wouldn't. My last annual inspection cost less than $500. George Patterson If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people he gives it to. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() That's about the furthest thing from the truth I've ever seen in these newsgroups. A prebuy is a DOZEN times harder than an annual inspection. All an annual inspection tells you is that nothing on the airplane is worn past service limits at the time of the inspection. An annual doesn't tell you that the oil hasn't been changed for two hundred hours. It doesn't tell you that the tires are down to within a hundredth of an inch of wear limits. It doesn't tell you that the brakes have less than 10% service life. It doesn't tell you that the battery has about two tugs left in it before pooping out completely. Shall I go on? I don't do prebuys for two reasons. One is that a good prebuy takes me the better part of 25 hours to do, and I can't charge that kind of money to somebody who may or may not be the owner of that airplane someday. Two is that I can actually miss something, by simple oversight or by opinion, that the new owner will rip me a new one when they have to have that item repaired or replaced. It just ain't worth it. And I sure as HELL wouldn't consider doing one for somebody with Kraus' attitude. Jim (Lynne Miller) shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: -Truthfully, a good pre-buy is actually an annual inspection. Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim,
ROFLMFAO.. You don't even know me so your comment about my attitude is laughable. As far as the pre-buy inspection goes the folks that do them tell me that they take not anywhere near 25 hours to do. Maybe you are ripping people off (25 + hours is ridiculous) and that is why you aren't getting any pre-buy business. But then again I don't know you either so who's to say right? :-) I would think that a shop that deals with a specific aircraft day in and day out would be able to point to the "problem" (expensive) areas of the aircraft in a reasonable amount of time. At least that is what they tell me. I think Byerly is a reputable firm and if they told me they can do it in 8 hours I believe them. It is of course your prerogative to disagree. Huggs and Kisses Jon Kraus PP-ASEL-IA Student airplane purchaser Jim Weir wrote: That's about the furthest thing from the truth I've ever seen in these newsgroups. A prebuy is a DOZEN times harder than an annual inspection. All an annual inspection tells you is that nothing on the airplane is worn past service limits at the time of the inspection. An annual doesn't tell you that the oil hasn't been changed for two hundred hours. It doesn't tell you that the tires are down to within a hundredth of an inch of wear limits. It doesn't tell you that the brakes have less than 10% service life. It doesn't tell you that the battery has about two tugs left in it before pooping out completely. Shall I go on? I don't do prebuys for two reasons. One is that a good prebuy takes me the better part of 25 hours to do, and I can't charge that kind of money to somebody who may or may not be the owner of that airplane someday. Two is that I can actually miss something, by simple oversight or by opinion, that the new owner will rip me a new one when they have to have that item repaired or replaced. It just ain't worth it. And I sure as HELL wouldn't consider doing one for somebody with Kraus' attitude. Jim (Lynne Miller) shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: -Truthfully, a good pre-buy is actually an annual inspection. Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "if they told me they can do it in 8 hours I believe them. Jon Kraus Dream on. You are not very mechanically inclined, are you? -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Probably more then you are ... you dream on Douggy.... :-)
Morgans wrote: "if they told me they can do it in 8 hours I believe them. Jon Kraus Dream on. You are not very mechanically inclined, are you? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There really is no such thing as "a standard pre-buy". A pre buy can
consist of anything you authorize the mechanic to do. First do a lookup on who that N number is registered to. Are you really dealing with the owner? What I would then suggest is you check the plane out as completely as YOU can. Upholstry, paint, hail damage, how if flies, do the radios, lights, gyros etc work. Make a written list. Get the logs. See if they have all the annauls (did they skip any). Transponder, pitot check. Take the logs to a mechanic. Have him check the gear and the engine and have HIM look at the logs and AD's. Is there any damage history? How is the repair? An O360 Mooney is going to run dollarwise: FIXED COSTS $?? Hangar or tie down ($500 to $3000) $1000-2000 insurance depending on pilot, Call Avemco and get a quote $1500 annual (just the annual part, not the repairs) HOURLY COSTS $25 fuel and oil $10 maintenance (this one is the bigest unknown) $10 engine reserve Jon Kraus wrote in message .. . Jim, ROFLMFAO.. You don't even know me so your comment about my attitude is laughable. As far as the pre-buy inspection goes the folks that do them tell me that they take not anywhere near 25 hours to do. Maybe you are ripping people off (25 + hours is ridiculous) and that is why you aren't getting any pre-buy business. But then again I don't know you either so who's to say right? :-) I would think that a shop that deals with a specific aircraft day in and day out would be able to point to the "problem" (expensive) areas of the aircraft in a reasonable amount of time. At least that is what they tell me. I think Byerly is a reputable firm and if they told me they can do it in 8 hours I believe them. It is of course your prerogative to disagree. Huggs and Kisses Jon Kraus PP-ASEL-IA Student airplane purchaser Jim Weir wrote: That's about the furthest thing from the truth I've ever seen in these newsgroups. A prebuy is a DOZEN times harder than an annual inspection. All an annual inspection tells you is that nothing on the airplane is worn past service limits at the time of the inspection. An annual doesn't tell you that the oil hasn't been changed for two hundred hours. It doesn't tell you that the tires are down to within a hundredth of an inch of wear limits. It doesn't tell you that the brakes have less than 10% service life. It doesn't tell you that the battery has about two tugs left in it before pooping out completely. Shall I go on? I don't do prebuys for two reasons. One is that a good prebuy takes me the better part of 25 hours to do, and I can't charge that kind of money to somebody who may or may not be the owner of that airplane someday. Two is that I can actually miss something, by simple oversight or by opinion, that the new owner will rip me a new one when they have to have that item repaired or replaced. It just ain't worth it. And I sure as HELL wouldn't consider doing one for somebody with Kraus' attitude. Jim (Lynne Miller) shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: -Truthfully, a good pre-buy is actually an annual inspection. Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I respectfully disagree. A prebuy inspection is what **I** am comfortable with.
And, as I said, I don't do them, because my comfort level is way to hell and gone off the top end. I want that person buying that airplane to know every little wear pattern on the airplane, in stark contrast to my annuals which certify that no part is beyond wear or airworthiness limits. I stick to my guns. An annual is 2 hours (more or less) of pure inspection. A prebuy to my standards is 25 hours or so; that's my 12:1 ratio I talked about. That's why I don't do them for anybody but myself. Jim (Doug) shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: -There really is no such thing as "a standard pre-buy". A pre buy can -consist of anything you authorize the mechanic to do. Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jon Kraus wrote: As far as the pre-buy inspection goes the folks that do them tell me that they take not anywhere near 25 hours to do. An A&P with experience with Maules can do an annual inspection of my aircraft in something like 18 hours. That includes all the "grunt work" that I normally do myself. I don't find it hard to believe that someone who's really trying to do a good job of finding every problem they reasonably can would take a few hours longer. George Patterson If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people he gives it to. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Weir wrote in message . ..
That's about the furthest thing from the truth I've ever seen in these newsgroups. A prebuy is a DOZEN times harder than an annual inspection. All an annual inspection tells you is that nothing on the airplane is worn past service limits at the time of the inspection. snipped for length, not content Heh. Having done waaay mor than fair share of pre-buy's, the best definition of a pre-buy was the one my old boss (FBO owner, ATP-rated, designated flight examiner, line pilot, AP/IA, new/used broker) gave to my wife. I was in the next hangar "inspecting" with the seller, the seller's broker, the prospective buyer, and the prospective buyer's broker. "Where's my husband?" "He's next door taking it in the ass." Pre-buy's suck, there is no formal definition under the FAR, and to do a proper one (as you indicate) takes an incredible amount of time, depending on the age/condition of the plane & maintenance records being inspected. Another "selling" broker's comment- "I've never had anyone take two days to do a pre-buy on a single" My response- "Don't come back" Have had quite a few where the aircraft, by definition, was unairworthy (9 times out of 10 due to paperwork issues). As a technician/inspector, my only "legal" recourse is of course to inform the pilot/operator, and walk away. My all-time favorites are ships recently brought back into the States. Plus the ones that have had recent blank-check periodic inspections from so-called "premier" make/model specific maintenance facilities and are absolute pieces of (insert excrement of choice). Bonanza's and Mooney's tend to fall into that category, sorry to say. Regards; TC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Home Inspection Listings | Patrick Glenn | Home Built | 4 | April 26th 04 11:52 AM |
Service Manual - 50 hour inspection | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 1 | April 8th 04 03:17 PM |
51st Fighter Wing betters rating to ‘excellent’ with inspection | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | February 20th 04 11:29 PM |
100 Hour Inspection Question | FryGuy | General Aviation | 59 | November 19th 03 04:01 AM |