![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke wrote:
This is a very interesting issue, to me. Reading the records of IMC loss-of-control accidents is very unsettling to this single pilot IFR flyer because of the cases where there *was* backup attitude instrumentation available. Even when there wasn't, the pilots usually had at least the turn coordinator to help keep the aircraft upright. It is too simple to chalk up all these accidents simply to lack of proficiency. There is something else going on - some human factors issue that has not been properly identified. Concur. I, too, don't think it's entirely lack of proficiency. I think there are pilots who have training and proficiency, who, in the words of my CFI, "ought to be able to do it", who don't. And clearly backup AI is no panacea. Obviously I can look for consistency with other instruments - does my DG or Turn indicator show I'm turning, does the VSI show a climb or descent - but what would be the best strategy given the various ways vacuum or electric driven instruments can fail? Having an inventive CFI who has little habits like mind-f***ing me into doubting my AI while palming the TC fuse, I think the best strategy is delimited above. *Instrument cross check is essential* Rod Machado's "Instrument Pilot Survival Manual" delineates something I haven't seen elsewhe Turn triangle of agreement: AI, TC, compass Pitch triangle of agreement: AI, VSI, alt static on/off The point is to deliberately cross-check instruments which depend upon independent power sources. The problem (for me anyway) in training is that my compass is mounted on the windshield bow and it's impossible to keep it in my scan in VMC under the hood w/out extensive "cheating". I also think Machado's under-utilizes ASI and hearing. I think the reasoning is that there are three sources of ASI failure and only two for VSI, one of which alt static eliminates. But when forced to fly instruments without static instruments, I found hearing was a fairly precise means of pitch control (at constant power for a fixed-pitch prop) Interested to see what others say: this topic should elicit a lot of opinions. Cheers, Sydney |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Backup vacuum pump system STC'ed for Cherokee 180 | Chuck | Owning | 6 | September 18th 04 02:30 PM |
Good AI backup, wish me luck | Robert M. Gary | Instrument Flight Rules | 29 | March 1st 04 05:36 PM |
Solid State Backup AI | Dan Truesdell | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | January 15th 04 09:53 PM |
Gyros - which do you trust? | Julian Scarfe | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | July 27th 03 09:36 AM |
Backup gyros - which do you trust? | Dan Luke | Owning | 46 | July 17th 03 08:06 PM |