![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As PIC, is the left seat pilot responsible for wrestling the
controls from the commercial pilot? What does being the left seat pilot have to do with being PIC? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nothing. It was just an identifying descriptor according to the story. If he
was said to have a red shirt, I would have called him "the pilot in the red shirt." Marco "Greg Esres" wrote in message ... As PIC, is the left seat pilot responsible for wrestling the controls from the commercial pilot? What does being the left seat pilot have to do with being PIC? Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:39:39 GMT, Greg Esres wrote
in Message-Id: : What does being the left seat pilot have to do with being PIC? It's a convention in some aircraft insurance policies, IIRC. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's a convention in some aircraft insurance policies, IIRC.
No doubt, but this wasn't an insurance company report. The poster showed a common misperception that the left seat pilot is automatically the PIC, since the report did not give any indication as to who was PIC. I was just doing my part to dispel that notion. ;-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg Esres" wrote in message ... It's a convention in some aircraft insurance policies, IIRC. No doubt, but this wasn't an insurance company report. The poster showed a common misperception that the left seat pilot is automatically the PIC, since the report did not give any indication as to who was PIC. I was just doing my part to dispel that notion. ;-) I hope you are not referring to my post because, as I stated, the "left seat" was used only to identify one person from the other. Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess the safe thing would be to insure that if you're flying in a
friend's plane that he has a higher rating than you..G An interesting thing happened at my home field S-44 last week. A chap a few hangers up from me took out his pristine Luscombe out for some local flying. A CFI from the local FBO comment he had no conventional gear time and was invited to go along for a ride. When landing to the South, there are some very tall trees which necessitates a displaced threshold of 250 feet. Well coming down final, the pilot was too low and the CFI passenger mentioned this a couple of times. He did not take over the controls. The Luscombe was so low that you can see scrape marks on the bottom of the cowl where he got the fence. The plane of course flipped & was totally destroyed. The owner had some serious lacerations, the CFI passenger scrapes and bruises. So instead of an interesting ride, the CFI passenger might be facing a career move. Cheers: Paul NC2273H |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
.....according to the commercial pilot.
-- Montblack "Just the usual inanity" "Gene Seibel" NTSB Identification: DEN04LA009 Accident occurred Sunday, October 12, 2003 in Las Cruces, NM Aircraft: Piper PA-28-140, registration: N891GP Injuries: 2 Uninjured. snip As the airplane approached the departure end of runway 08, the commercial pilot took control of the airplane. He added power to attempt a go-around. The airplane began to stall/mush and the right main landing gear caught a patch of sage brush and the airplane impacted the terrain. The impact with terrain separated the right main landing gear and displaced the right wing. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |