A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Too many pilots in the cockpit spoil the landing...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 29th 03, 06:39 PM
Greg Esres
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As PIC, is the left seat pilot responsible for wrestling the
controls from the commercial pilot?

What does being the left seat pilot have to do with being PIC?
  #2  
Old October 29th 03, 07:27 PM
Marco Leon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nothing. It was just an identifying descriptor according to the story. If he
was said to have a red shirt, I would have called him "the pilot in the red
shirt."

Marco

"Greg Esres" wrote in message
...
As PIC, is the left seat pilot responsible for wrestling the
controls from the commercial pilot?

What does being the left seat pilot have to do with being PIC?




Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
  #3  
Old October 29th 03, 08:38 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:39:39 GMT, Greg Esres wrote
in Message-Id: :

What does being the left seat pilot have to do with being PIC?


It's a convention in some aircraft insurance policies, IIRC.
  #4  
Old October 29th 03, 09:51 PM
Greg Esres
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It's a convention in some aircraft insurance policies, IIRC.

No doubt, but this wasn't an insurance company report.

The poster showed a common misperception that the left seat pilot is
automatically the PIC, since the report did not give any indication as
to who was PIC. I was just doing my part to dispel that notion. ;-)



  #5  
Old October 30th 03, 05:28 PM
Marco Leon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Greg Esres" wrote in message
...
It's a convention in some aircraft insurance policies, IIRC.

No doubt, but this wasn't an insurance company report.

The poster showed a common misperception that the left seat pilot is
automatically the PIC, since the report did not give any indication as
to who was PIC. I was just doing my part to dispel that notion. ;-)


I hope you are not referring to my post because, as I stated, the "left
seat" was used only to identify one person from the other.





Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
  #6  
Old October 30th 03, 01:25 PM
Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I guess the safe thing would be to insure that if you're flying in a
friend's plane that he has a higher rating than you..G
An interesting thing happened at my home field S-44 last week. A chap a few
hangers up from me took out his pristine Luscombe out for some local flying.
A CFI from the local FBO comment he had no conventional gear time and was
invited to go along for a ride.

When landing to the South, there are some very tall trees which necessitates
a displaced threshold of 250 feet. Well coming down final, the pilot was too
low and the CFI passenger mentioned this a couple of times. He did not take
over the controls. The Luscombe was so low that you can see scrape marks on
the bottom of the cowl where he got the fence. The plane of course flipped &
was totally destroyed. The owner had some serious lacerations, the CFI
passenger scrapes and bruises.

So instead of an interesting ride, the CFI passenger might be facing a
career move.

Cheers:

Paul
NC2273H



  #7  
Old October 29th 03, 06:01 PM
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

.....according to the commercial pilot.

--
Montblack
"Just the usual inanity"


"Gene Seibel"
NTSB Identification: DEN04LA009
Accident occurred Sunday, October 12, 2003 in Las Cruces, NM
Aircraft: Piper PA-28-140, registration: N891GP
Injuries: 2 Uninjured.

snip
As the airplane approached the departure end of runway
08, the commercial pilot took control of the airplane. He added power
to attempt a go-around. The airplane began to stall/mush and the right
main landing gear caught a patch of sage brush and the airplane
impacted the terrain. The impact with terrain separated the right main
landing gear and displaced the right wing.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Dover short pilots since vaccine order Roman Bystrianyk Naval Aviation 0 December 29th 04 12:47 AM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! Military Aviation 120 January 27th 04 10:19 AM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! General Aviation 3 December 23rd 03 08:53 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.