A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

flying to new Udvar-Hazy Smithsonian Air & Space Museum



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 20th 03, 09:55 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ...

Hmmm. For what they are spending on the annex, the extra cost to construct
a bridge for the taxiway over the road couldn't be THAT significant, could
it?

Frankly, something as low tech as a stop sign would probably suffice.
At the Army AIr Field I was based at we had stop lights and warning horms
to keep you from crossing the approach area of the runway while aircraft
were landing.


  #2  
Old November 20th 03, 10:15 PM
John Harlow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frankly, something as low tech as a stop sign would probably suffice.

Lol - do they even have those for the alaskan highway slash runways?


  #3  
Old November 21st 03, 12:42 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
. ..
Frankly, something as low tech as a stop sign would probably suffice.


I think that depends on whether the access road is open to the general
public or not (and I don't know whether it is or not). IMHO, if it's open
to the general public, a stop sign *should* be sufficient but probably is
not. Even a traffic signal is eventually going to result in an accident and
a lawsuit. If it went to jury, aviation would certainly get the short end
of the stick, regardless of signage.

If the access road is only for "authorized personnel", as I assume the one
at the Army base you referred to is, I think proper signaling of the
intersection would be fine and relatively immune to nitwits.

Either way, it's a shame there's no direct access to the museum right now.

Pete


  #4  
Old November 21st 03, 12:55 AM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ...
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
. ..
Frankly, something as low tech as a stop sign would probably suffice.


I think that depends on whether the access road is open to the general
public or not (and I don't know whether it is or not).


It's the old Gate 4 access road. It's not open to the public. The public
entrance comes in via a new fly over ramp on route 28 a little farther south
and stays east of the museum ramp area.

Once you get through that gate, you are able to drive into movement areas
so you should be watching for aircraft anyhow.


  #5  
Old November 21st 03, 01:00 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...
Once you get through that gate, you are able to drive into movement areas
so you should be watching for aircraft anyhow.


Ahh...well, then yes...I agree that not only should a stop sign suffice, it
surely would as well. We have similar intersections around Paine Field
(KPAE) and they work just fine. I suspect they are not all that rare at the
larger airports.

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post MrHabilis Home Built 0 June 11th 04 06:07 PM
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! [email protected] General Aviation 0 March 27th 04 12:24 AM
Progress on Flying Car Steve Dufour General Aviation 5 December 19th 03 04:48 PM
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING The Ink Company Aviation Marketplace 0 November 5th 03 01:07 AM
'They want to ban recreational flying...' Thomas J. Paladino Jr. Piloting 28 July 22nd 03 08:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.