![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Folks -- time to remember....whoever is living in the white house does
not dictate security measures. It's the USSS (US Secret Service). And it's unlikely that any president is ever going to override them for anything. If the massive hose-up for Boston is not grounds for being overridden, then nothing is. Security issues and management have been getting more and more strict the past 30 years. It's just more visible now. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Martin Hotze" wrote in message ... On Sun, 30 May 2004 12:18:48 -0400, Tom A. Carlson wrote: "The biggest problem: The convention's at Fleet Center, and Fleet is right next to North Station - the transportation hub of the Hub. It includes a commuter-rail station and a subway stop, both of which will be closed. Worse, the city's major north-south thoroughfare, I-93, runs underground right next to the Fleet Center - and the Secret Service demands it be shut down for hours each day, including the entire afternoon commute, and not just in the affected area, but for miles in either direction. Bridges and tunnels will also be blocked." -- Beantown Lockdown - NY Post http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/op...ists/21741.htm whoever is in charge, you'll have those restrictions. well, either you are very happy with them or it's time to kick some people's ass. You know, _we_ the people .... "We the people" can do squat! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 06:27:42 +0100, S Green wrote:
whoever is in charge, you'll have those restrictions. well, either you are very happy with them or it's time to kick some people's ass. You know, _we_ the people .... "We the people" can do squat! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ooo---oooh land of the free .... land of the brave ... scnr. :-) #m -- Martin!!! Maaaaartiiiin!!! Can you please flame this guy for me? 'HECTOP' in rec.aviation.piloting |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ummmm .... I think you mean "square miles."
3291 miles square would cover approximately all of the US and Canada. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... Ummmm .... I think you mean "square miles." 3291 miles square would cover approximately all of the US and Canada. The US is 3.2 MILLION square miles. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 02:55:04 -0700, Tom Sixkiller wrote:
Ummmm .... I think you mean "square miles." 3291 miles square would cover approximately all of the US and Canada. The US is 3.2 MILLION square miles. and 3,291 x 3,291 (3,291 miles square) equals 10,830,681 #m -- Martin!!! Maaaaartiiiin!!! Can you please flame this guy for me? 'HECTOP' in rec.aviation.piloting |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Martin Hotze wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2004 02:55:04 -0700, Tom Sixkiller wrote: Ummmm .... I think you mean "square miles." 3291 miles square would cover approximately all of the US and Canada. The US is 3.2 MILLION square miles. and 3,291 x 3,291 (3,291 miles square) equals 10,830,681 No, that would be miles *squared*, not miles square. George Patterson None of us is as dumb as all of us. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... Ummmm .... I think you mean "square miles." 3291 miles square would cover approximately all of the US and Canada. The US is 3.2 MILLION square miles. sigh find a fourth grade math book, and look up the difference between "xxx square miles" and "xxx miles square". |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... Ummmm .... I think you mean "square miles." 3291 miles square would cover approximately all of the US and Canada. The US is 3.2 MILLION square miles. sigh find a fourth grade math book, and look up the difference between "xxx square miles" and "xxx miles square". Er. That is _exactly_ what he is saying. The title of this thread, is '3291 statute miles square', which would be 10830681 square miles. As he says, this would cover the whole of the US and Canade, plus a bit over. He was simply pointing out that the thread should really be entitled either 'about 58 miles square', or '3291 square miles', rather than the current title... Best Wishes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah Lord knows we dont want a leader who does what he says. Think of
the fun we'll have with Kerry ....Every day a different stance on every issue!!! And you thought it was fun riding the "gravatron" you haven't even begun to spin If Kerry gets elected. And while he has us dizzy... We'll get to see him taking the money out of our wallets and re-distributing it to those that he sees fit. We'll get to see our heritage and history completed removed from our view. We'll get to see the Jews pushed into the Sea. We'll get to see terrorists murdering our citizens, cause we know how much respect Isalmo-facists respect Democrats and appeasement (Tell them all about it Jimmy Carter). And for your choice of Kerry we will also get to ... Pay 15.00 for avgas because thats our fair share and have to contribute to the Kyoto treaty. Dont wanna disturb the artic fly and their breeding cycle in ANWAR. We will get the UN (dictators, socialsits and despotits) to tell us when and where we'll use our defense to protect us. Only after they have divvied up the latest oil for money proceeds. We will get Abortion on demand, syringes in our schools and homosexuality projected as the way it should be. Reagan reminds us that leadership has burdens, burdens we all must carry.. but it must be carried and acted on. Lets not waiver in our way of life and submit to the easy way out. I know a great way to get rid of the TFRs ... get rid of the people that have caused them in the first place, not elect their friends into office. Larry Dighera wrote in : Fortunately, we won't have to put up with this clown much longer: ------------------------------------------------------------------- AVflash Volume 10, Number 22a -- May 23, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------- THE TFR THAT WAS, THE PRESIDENT THAT WASN'T ... THERE Saturday (according to a TFR issued May 20) saw the airspace around Austin (Texas) Bergstrom International Airport restricted for GA traffic and open for the president ... who showed up but then skipped the event he was in town to see. Alas, the Temporary Flight Restriction, which read in part, "AIRCRAFT FLIGHT OPERATIONS ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN 30 NMR UP TO BUT NOT INCLUDING FL1801" ... and then in part two... "ALL AIRCRAFT ENTERING OR EXITING THE 30 NMR TFR SHALL BE ON AN ACTIVE IFR OR VFR FLIGHT PLAN" was offered to the flying public regardless of (clarity or) presidential presence. The restrictions were intended to allow presidential access to the area relatively free from free-range light aircraft and allow the proud Bush parents to witness the graduation of daughter Jenna ... who also didn't show up. Consistency, at least. http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#187342 On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:32:13 GMT, Larry Dighera wrote in Message-Id: : It looks like we're not the only ones who think baby Bush's 3,000+ square mile TFRs are too big: ------------------------------------------------------------- AOPA ePilot Volume 5, Issue 50 December 12, 2003 ------------------------------------------------------------- PENNSYLVANIA LAWMAKERS CALL FOR SMALLER TFRs Remember that poor pipeline patrol pilot who unwittingly flew over the presidential motorcade in Philadelphia earlier this year? The Pennsylvania legislature certainly does. AOPA President Phil Boyer was the honored guest of state Rep. Gene McGill, an AOPA member, as the House of Representatives on Monday passed, by a near-unanimous vote, a resolution that calls on federal security officials to reduce the size of temporary flight restrictions (TFRs) resulting from presidential travel. The four-page resolution asks for authorities to "reconsider the need to issue such restrictions based on nonspecific threats and ways to improve the timely dissemination of flight restriction information to pilots." The resolution will be sent to key federal government officials. See AOPA Online ( http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...03-4-139x.html ). On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 21:06:37 GMT, Larry Dighera wrote in Message-Id: : On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 06:07:34 -0400, Cub Driver wrote in Message-Id: : The prezdint is coming to Portsmouth and Manchester NH this week, and AOPA reminds us that in such cases he is usually accompanied by a 60-mile TFR. Right. Baby Bush inflicts a 60 nm diameter no-fly-zone on the NAS wherever he goes in this country. They call it a 30 nm TFR, but it's really 2,826 nautical miles square, or 3,291 statute miles square! All he has to do to defeat the Democrats next year is to be near their convention site during its duration; air transportation will be halted. -- Irrational beliefs ultimately lead to irrational acts. -- Larry Dighera, |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 10th 04 12:35 AM |
| What is the reasoning behind the smaller radius vice presidential TFR? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 38 | November 19th 03 05:04 PM |