![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 07:46:47 -0600, "Dan Luke"
wrote: Right wing charges of partisanship are hard to support in light of the fact that NPR frequently uses commentary from sources to the right of center, e.g. The Wall Street Journal, U. S. News and World Report, The American Enterprise Institute and The Cato Institute, just to name a few. In the hourly news summaries, the form of an NPR story during the Clinton years seemed to start with some exposition, usually something the Republican Congress was starting up, followed by some in-depth analysis why whatever it was was desperately wrong. I've spot-checked them since 2000; they appear to not have changed their approach to reporting. The in-depth reporting, if it's human interest or pure exposition, is usually excellent. In-depth political reporting suffers from the same stuff that has plagued some newspapers: The slant is in the way the piece is organized and edited, not in the material the reporter gathered. The right gets its say, but is made to look the fool anyway. Like all news media outlets, they too have unquestioned premises. One of them is that Democrats are Better. Rob |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|