A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Your very own suspected terrorist



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 26th 04, 03:57 PM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Rob Perkins
wrote:

EDR wrote:
$50 million would buy a lot of airline tickets to El Junque, Puerto
Rico, the only rain forest in the US Park Service.


What? Olympic National Forest doesn't count?


El Junque is a tropical rain forest.
What kind of rain forest is Olympic?
  #2  
Old January 27th 04, 01:11 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



EDR wrote:

What kind of rain forest is Olympic?


They call that a temperate weather rain forest. There's at least one in Washington
State and another larger one in Canada.

George Patterson
Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is
"Hummmmm... That's interesting...."
  #3  
Old January 27th 04, 07:18 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...
|
|
| EDR wrote:
|
| What kind of rain forest is Olympic?
|
| They call that a temperate weather rain forest. There's at least one in
Washington
| State and another larger one in Canada.
|

Even the one in Washington is considerably larger than El Junque.


  #4  
Old January 27th 04, 07:27 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"EDR" wrote in message
...
| In article , Rob Perkins
| wrote:
|
| EDR wrote:
| $50 million would buy a lot of airline tickets to El Junque, Puerto
| Rico, the only rain forest in the US Park Service.
|
| What? Olympic National Forest doesn't count?
|
| El Junque is a tropical rain forest.
| What kind of rain forest is Olympic?

Even if you want to limit it to tropical rain forests there are tropical
rain forests in Volcanoes National Park in Hawaii.


  #5  
Old January 27th 04, 07:31 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"EDR" wrote in message
...
| In article , Rob Perkins
| wrote:
|
| EDR wrote:
| $50 million would buy a lot of airline tickets to El Junque, Puerto
| Rico, the only rain forest in the US Park Service.
|
| What? Olympic National Forest doesn't count?
|
| El Junque is a tropical rain forest.
| What kind of rain forest is Olympic?

There is also the National Park of American Samoa, which contains rain
forest.

IOW, don't believe all the hype you hear from the cruise lines. El Junque is
not the only rain forest in the National Park system. Nor is it the only
tropical rain forest. It may be a very nice rain forest for all that, but
claiming that El Junque is the only one is a little like Brazil claiming
that the Wright Brothers did not really fly and therefore Santos-Dumont was
first.


  #6  
Old January 26th 04, 02:35 PM
Richard Russell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:10:05 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote:

WHY has Congress approved a rain forest for Iowa? It doesn't make any
sense...


No one here knows. This lame-brained idea has been proposed as an
environmental and educational tool by a wealthy businessman from Des Moines.
He's been shopping the idea around for four or five years now, with little
success or interest from local developers.

Somehow he has managed to get Sen. Grassley involved, who apparently had the
clout to ram it into the overall spending bill. (Can you say "Major
Campaign Contribution?")

What the hell our federal government is doing building rain forests in Iowa
is simply beyond me. Even the local newspaper -- as left wing, pork-barrel
project loving as you can imagine -- has publicly ridiculed the idea.

Iowa doesn't have the yearly precipitation needed for rainforest
climates, does it?


It's going to be built IN-DOORS, under a roof that would dome over three
football fields!

I'm dumb-founded. Even though it will probably bring more guests to my
hotel, I think it's the dumbest idea I've EVER heard.



It's pork, pure and simple. Pork was never required to make sense.
The only requirement is that it brings money into the state. No need
to try to rationalize it beyond that.
Rich Russell
  #7  
Old January 26th 04, 03:40 PM
Dennis O'Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have long advocated that house and senate rules require that any
amendments to a bill have to be directly related to that bill, no
non-related riders, period...
The chances of the public getting their elected representatives to make such
a rule and actually earn their keep by openly voting on every piece of pork
as a separate bill in it's own right, range between zero and minus
infinity...
I suspect that whoever will write the book, The Rise, Decline, and Fall, of
The United States of America, roughly a thousand years from now, will cite
that specific issue as being directly responsible for the final economic
collapse of our country due to every dollar of the GNP becoming someones,
"entitlement"...
denny

"Richard Russell" wrote in message It's pork,
pure and simple. Pork was never required to make sense.
The only requirement is that it brings money into the state. No need
to try to rationalize it beyond that.
Rich Russell



  #8  
Old January 26th 04, 03:58 PM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Richard
Russell wrote:

It's pork, pure and simple. Pork was never required to make sense.
The only requirement is that it brings money into the state. No need
to try to rationalize it beyond that.


Of course it's pork! It is Iowa, after all.
  #9  
Old January 27th 04, 01:13 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Jay Honeck wrote:

What the hell our federal government is doing building rain forests in Iowa
is simply beyond me. Even the local newspaper -- as left wing, pork-barrel
project loving as you can imagine -- has publicly ridiculed the idea.


I take it that the lunch counter there will specialize in barbeque.

George Patterson
Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is
"Hummmmm... That's interesting...."
  #10  
Old January 27th 04, 05:33 PM
Paul Sengupta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Oh, like one of these!

http://www.edenproject.com/

Paul

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:N4gQb.132988$xy6.545923@attbi_s02...
It's going to be built IN-DOORS, under a roof that would dome over three
football fields!



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
BUSH REJECTED PLANS TO GO AFTER TOP TERRORIST WalterM140 Military Aviation 7 September 24th 04 01:09 AM
Bu$h Jr's Iran-Contra -- The Pentagone's Reign of Terror PirateJohn Military Aviation 1 September 6th 03 10:05 AM
more reasons for GA: John Gilmo I was ejected from a plane for wearing "Suspected Terrorist" button Martin Hotze Piloting 80 August 3rd 03 12:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.