![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Lamb wrote:
Pete Schaefer wrote: Heat is usually the big one. How you get rid of it is critical, of course. Dave Driskoll (DH) can probably tell us all more about this. One of the things that is really cool about the DeltaHawk engines is that they are designed to be run continuously at max (pretty sure about this.....Dave, are you there?). That's a lot of full-time horses. That't what it takes for aircraft ops. Pete is quite correct, dumping heat is major hurdle to continuous power operations and unfortunately it is generally not as simple as adding larger radiators or oil coolers. Extracting BTU's from the oil or coolant is really the simple part of the problem. Getting BTU's from the combustion chamber, through the cylinder sleeves, piston crowns, and fire plates without cooking the coolant, your bearings, or any of the aforementioned parts can be quite challenging. As a simple example, the VW TDI uses an oil squirter to spray cooling oil on the bottom of the piston. That system is designed to remove a BTU's at a certain rate and remain in equilibrium, IE stable oil temperature at a certain HP (this would be the maximum continuous HP). If we decide to increase the max. HP we now have to remove more BTU's with the oil to maintain a stable temperature, this means more oil needs to be sprayed. Ok put a bigger orifice on the oil jet. Unfortunately putting on a larger jet reduces oil pressure which is bad for the main bearings, so in addition to the larger jet, we now need to put a larger oil pump on the engine to give us the required oil pressure. Oops that bigger pump uses some of the additional HP that you thought you were going to get and now we repeat the process with a larger jet and oil pump so we net out the HP we are really after. Ok now that we've go that solved, we notice that all the extra oil flinging around in the crank case is too much for our current ring pack and we need a new design there for better oil control. This new ring pack will of course mean more friction, less net HP, etc., etc., etc. (bang head here)...... As Pete commented, the DeltaHawk is rated for continuos duty throughout its HP range (as are most aircraft engines), most automotive engines are not. While there certainly have been a number of very successful automotive conversions, all of the successful ones have been the result of a significant engineering and test efforts (a program which I suspect is probably not unlike developing an aviation diesel from scratch). Dave Driscoll DeltaHawk LLC |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Car engine FAA certified for airplane use | Cy Galley | Home Built | 10 | February 6th 04 03:03 PM |
Objective Engine Discussion | Rick Maddy | Home Built | 26 | October 14th 03 04:46 AM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |
Gasflow of VW engine | Veeduber | Home Built | 4 | July 14th 03 08:06 AM |