![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Andrew Gideon wrote in
online.com: o The effective "BFR" date (i.e. when you are again covered for 24 calendar months) starts the DATE of the last necessary part of the WINGS. Ah. That's what I'm missing. Where in the AC did you find this? (And how did I miss it? {8^) It's *my* reading (i.e. good for what you paid for it G) of: 6. PARTICIPATION IN THE PILOT PROFICIENCY AWARD PROGRAM IN LIEU OF A FLIGHT REVIEW. A pilot need not accomplish the flight review requirements of 14 CFR part 61, ~ 61.56 if, since the beginning of the 24th calendar month before the month in which that pilot acts as pilot in command, he or she has satisfactorily completed one or more phases of an FAA-sponsored Pilot Proficiency Award Program in an aircraft (reference 61.56(f)). First part is clear... you don't need a BFR if in the preceding 24 calendar months you have "completed one or more phases of an FAA- sponsored PPAP". The point at which you have completed the phase is when you do the last of the four items (1 flight hour in each of three areas, plus the safety seminar), and get the appropriate wings signoff in your logbook. It doesn't say anything about when you mail in the card, or when they respond to it. And, as I mentioned, that now seems to also be the date that they are putting on the certificate they eventually send back to you. o The "once per year" thing seems a bit more complicated. As I read the AC you can finish a WINGS set one day, then go out two days later and do the whole thing over again (3 hours flying plus safety seminar)... you just can't send the little blue card in to the FSDO for another 12 months. As I understand this then (and ignoring the calendar month issue), if I did as you describe, I'd have to wait 363 days before I could submit the paperwork again. Once I did submit, though, I'd push my BFR date back by two days. 7. TRAINING REQUIREMENTS PHASES I THROUGH XX. Minimum requirements, ...All training requirements for each phase of the program must be completed within 12 months. After completing a phase of the program, pilots may begin working on the requirements of the succeeding phase at any time; however, 12 months must pass between the date of completion of it phase and application for tile award for the next phase. This one is trickier. You have 12 months to complete an entire phase. The 12 months can start ANYTIME after the previous phase is completed, but you can't drag it out over five years and then turn it in for a Wings phase. Here's the next catch. "12 months must pass between the date of completion of it phase and application for tile award for the next phase." My reading of that (and it is just my reading) is that even if you complete the necessary stuff for the next phase, you can not *apply* (i.e. send in the card) for the next phase until 12 months have elapsed after the date of the previous phase completion. And yeah, if you went out the very next day and did the entire thing, it would only extend your "BFR date" by that day. [FWIW, I checked the FAA site and the original poster submitted the AC correctly - all those typo's and poor grammar are really in there. G] It sounds kinda squirrelly, but thinking about it, I'm not sure there is much other way to word it that doesn't have all the same weirdness. You don't want someone going through 25 wing phases in a month. You don't want someone claiming that this made them BFR-proficient when they only flew one hour per year. And you don't want someone claiming they are BFR-proficient because they sent in the blue card - for stuff they did five years ago. This seems to take care of all those cases. Again, just my understanding of it, which (to me) looks like it is supported by the language of the AC. Contradicting opinions welcomed. ----------------------------------------------- James M. Knox TriSoft ph 512-385-0316 1109-A Shady Lane fax 512-366-4331 Austin, Tx 78721 ----------------------------------------------- |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VP-II wings available in Oregon, USA (Or, "How I was coconuted...") | Roberto Waltman | Home Built | 2 | October 29th 04 05:21 PM |
| Double covering fabric covered wings | [email protected] | Home Built | 9 | May 9th 04 09:39 PM |
| Stolen "Champ" wings located...from 23,000 feet!! | Tom Pappano | Piloting | 17 | December 15th 03 02:24 PM |
| Wings from "Champ" stolen in Oklahoma after emergency landing | Tom Pappano | Piloting | 1 | December 7th 03 06:02 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |