![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gerald Sylvester wrote in message hlink.net...
I got a strange thing going on. I got my license a couple of months ago. My day landings are smooth but not the smoothest. I do them. i don't myself, a passenger or the plane but sometimes not greasers. my night landings, every one of them, I can grease them in. Shouldn't it be the opposite? I find this completely backwards as you have more visual cues during the day. Anyone else have this 'problem?' obviously if my day landings were that bad i wouldn't have been able to pass my checkride. Strange. Gerald Sylvester An easy way to fix that problem is to go land at night on a wider runway than you're used to. Then you'll flare to high and really wham it down. :-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gerald Sylvester wrote:
I got a strange thing going on. I got my license a couple of months ago. My day landings are smooth but not the smoothest. I do them. i don't myself, a passenger or the plane but sometimes not greasers. my night landings, every one of them, I can grease them in. Shouldn't it be the opposite? I find this completely backwards as you have more visual cues during the day. Anyone else have this 'problem?' obviously if my day landings were that bad i wouldn't have been able to pass my checkride. Strange. Gerald Sylvester Same with me (night landings are greasers). My instructor said it's common. As others have said, it's probably because your only cues, the lights at the end of the runway, are the correct ones. -- Nick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Nick Are you saying that "black out" landings (not using landing lights) are smoother than day time landings? (Read your post) Been there, done that, day and night, IFR and VFR (including infiltration/exfiltration landings with no landing lights and no runway lights) and landings other than daylight landings are not normally smoother than run of the mill day landings. Every landing is a critical phase of flight and max effort should be made to make the transition from flight to ground operation as precision (and safe) as possible. Practice makes perfect. Big John On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:25:30 +1100, Nick Coleman wrote: ----clip---- Same with me (night landings are greasers). My instructor said it's common. As others have said, it's probably because your only cues, the lights at the end of the runway, are the correct ones. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big John wrote:
Nick Are you saying that "black out" landings (not using landing lights) are smoother than day time landings? (Read your post) No, I mean that my normal with-lights-on landings at night (what we fall Night VFR; here in Australia we need a special rating to fly at night) were typically smoother than landings during the day, and that when I commented on it to my instructor, he said that is not uncommon. We hypothesised a bit and came up with: less turbulence, and that landing at night forces you to look to the end of the runway for perspective and height judgement, and that produces a greaser. My experience in the C172 was that the landing light is pretty useless in the flare and so doesn't serve as a reference point. I do remember my instructor emphasising that I should be looking at the end-lights at the far end of the runway. Been there, done that, day and night, IFR and VFR (including infiltration/exfiltration landings with no landing lights and no runway lights) and landings other than daylight landings are not normally smoother than run of the mill day landings. Sure, I'm only commenting on my experience. But I admit I have very limited time at night. Every landing is a critical phase of flight and max effort should be made to make the transition from flight to ground operation as precision (and safe) as possible. Absolutely. Practice makes perfect. Big John On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:25:30 +1100, Nick Coleman wrote: ----clip---- Same with me (night landings are greasers). My instructor said it's common. As others have said, it's probably because your only cues, the lights at the end of the runway, are the correct ones. -- Nick |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nick
Wasn't trying to push a wet noodle ![]() Different pilots have different night adaption ability. Cockpit lighting (red or white) makes a difference. Phase of the moon makes a difference. The airplane your flying makes a difference. I list all of these to make the point that a single statement about night landings may have a lot of modifiers that will effect it. I have a lot of time in heavy iron (P-40, P-51, AT-6, etc) When you flare in those birds you lose the lights at the far end of the runway and use the landing lights and side runway lights to keep straight and judge your height above ground. With that background, when in GA, I still do the same which I am comfortable with and have done for years even though I can most of the time see the lights at the far end of R/W after flare.. To you and the others who have maxed night landings, a pat on the back and keep up the good work. It's another big hurdle passed in flying. Big John On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:59:24 +1100, Nick Coleman wrote: Big John wrote: Nick Are you saying that "black out" landings (not using landing lights) are smoother than day time landings? (Read your post) No, I mean that my normal with-lights-on landings at night (what we fall Night VFR; here in Australia we need a special rating to fly at night) were typically smoother than landings during the day, and that when I commented on it to my instructor, he said that is not uncommon. We hypothesised a bit and came up with: less turbulence, and that landing at night forces you to look to the end of the runway for perspective and height judgement, and that produces a greaser. My experience in the C172 was that the landing light is pretty useless in the flare and so doesn't serve as a reference point. I do remember my instructor emphasising that I should be looking at the end-lights at the far end of the runway. Been there, done that, day and night, IFR and VFR (including infiltration/exfiltration landings with no landing lights and no runway lights) and landings other than daylight landings are not normally smoother than run of the mill day landings. Sure, I'm only commenting on my experience. But I admit I have very limited time at night. Every landing is a critical phase of flight and max effort should be made to make the transition from flight to ground operation as precision (and safe) as possible. Absolutely. Practice makes perfect. Big John On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:25:30 +1100, Nick Coleman wrote: ----clip---- Same with me (night landings are greasers). My instructor said it's common. As others have said, it's probably because your only cues, the lights at the end of the runway, are the correct ones. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() my night landings, every one of them, I can grease them in. Shouldn't it be the opposite? My night landings are so scary that even I close my eyes. Hmmmmm....... I think that I just worked out what I'm doing wrong ![]() Tony -- Tony Roberts PP-ASEL VFR OTT Night Almost Instrument ![]() Cessna 172H C-GICE |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
regaining night currency but not alone | Teacherjh | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | May 28th 04 02:08 PM |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 111 | May 4th 04 05:34 PM |
Night of the bombers - the most daring special mission of Finnishbombers in WW2 | Jukka O. Kauppinen | Military Aviation | 4 | March 22nd 04 11:19 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |