![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Arden Prinz" wrote in message .......That brings up a question --- when does the "remain clear of class C airspace" instruction end? ...I figured that since he called my by tail number and was clearly communicating with me and didn't assign any vectors or repeat his direction to remain clear, that it was now understood that I could enter. When you're talking about airspace entry, etc., pilot/controller interaction is *never* "understood", or "presumed". Clear and direct statements are used. The controller didn't give any indication that I had done anything wrong, but I want to be sure that I understand this for the future. So ... if I'm told to remain clear in the future, WHEN does that end? When you hear the phrase '....cleared to enter...', or '....cleared into...', or some such. The "remain clear" instruction is so that you don't come barging into the class C immediately after takeoff, before the controller has a chance to identify and coordinate you. He probably didn't make an issue of it because he was about to clear you to turn in anyway [speculation on my part.]. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The basic thrust of your analysis is correct for most controlled airspace,
John; but the clinker in the ashes here is that when a class C controller calls your tail number, it is per the rules THE permission to enter unless he specifically instructs you to remain clear... What the AIM does not make it clear is that after being told to stand clear, any subsequent tail number call, and especially with a phrase like, 'radar contact established', barometer setting, etc., is clearance to enter per the rule unless he repeats the instruction to remain clear, or assigns you a heading, etc.. A point the FAA ought to clarify... I would, like you, prefer that the AIM require the controller to say, ". . . cleared . . . " It does not, that I can find... denny "John Gaquin" wrote in When you hear the phrase '....cleared to enter...', or '....cleared into...', or some such. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dennis O'Connor" wrote in message .....when a class C controller calls your tail number, it is per the rules THE permission to enter unless he specifically instructs you to remain clear... I stand corrected. I didn't (and still don't) recall that detail, but then again, I never flew anything but IFR after about 1982. Doesn't sound like it makes much sense, to me, but if that's what's written..... |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dennis O'Connor" wrote in message ... The basic thrust of your analysis is correct for most controlled airspace, John; but the clinker in the ashes here is that when a class C controller calls your tail number, it is per the rules THE permission to enter unless he specifically instructs you to remain clear... What the AIM does not make it clear is that after being told to stand clear, any subsequent tail number call, and especially with a phrase like, 'radar contact established', barometer setting, etc., is clearance to enter per the rule unless he repeats the instruction to remain clear, or assigns you a heading, etc.. The reason the AIM doesn't say that is because that's not the way it is. Once told to remain clear you must remain clear until receipt of an instruction that permits entry. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article et,
Steven P. McNicoll wrote: The reason the AIM doesn't say that is because that's not the way it is. Once told to remain clear you must remain clear until receipt of an instruction that permits entry. The O.P. stated that after recieving a beacon code and being told to remain clear the controller then called him back and asked some questions. That sounds like he was setting up a progress strip for VFR advisories for him. He said he thought the controller also may have acknowleged radar contact. I think an acknowlegement of radar contact would then permit entry to Class C. All you need to enter Class C is a Mode C transponder and two-way radio communications. You do not need to be "cleared into" Class C. Would you not agree? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tom Fleischman" wrote in message rthlink.net... The O.P. stated that after recieving a beacon code and being told to remain clear the controller then called him back and asked some questions. That sounds like he was setting up a progress strip for VFR advisories for him. He said he thought the controller also may have acknowleged radar contact. I think an acknowlegement of radar contact would then permit entry to Class C. All you need to enter Class C is a Mode C transponder and two-way radio communications. You do not need to be "cleared into" Class C. Would you not agree? "Radar contact" does not override the instruction to remain clear of the Class C airspace. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 27th 04 12:24 AM |
| Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 03:41 AM |
| Is a BFR instruction? | Roger Long | Piloting | 11 | December 11th 03 10:58 PM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 02:27 PM |