![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Hermann wrote: As a european pilot I would prefer meters. But how to rearrange separation standards, any ideas? Use 300 meters for every 1,000'. That's a little less separation, but it wouldn't be too hard for a pilot to deal with the arithmetic. George Patterson Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would not yield to the tongue. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G.R. Patterson III" writes:
Peter Hermann wrote: As a european pilot I would prefer meters. But how to rearrange separation standards, any ideas? Use 300 meters for every 1,000'. That's a little less separation, but it wouldn't be too hard for a pilot to deal with the arithmetic. If flight levels were named in meters and were all a multiple of 300 m, this might even add an additional communications-safety mechanism: In all valid flight levels, the sum of all digits would always be divisible by three. This adds a bit of healthy redundancy to a figure that needs to be communicated without ambiguity over noisy radio channels. Getting a single digit wrong would be spotted with 60% probability. Almost as good as adding a check digit. Markus |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In misc.metric-system Markus Kuhn wrote:
If flight levels were named in meters and were all a multiple of 300 m, this might even add an additional communications-safety mechanism: In all valid flight levels, the sum of all digits would always be divisible by three. This adds a bit of healthy redundancy to a figure that needs to be communicated without ambiguity over noisy radio channels. Getting a single digit wrong would be spotted with 60% probability. Almost as good as adding a check digit. Subsequently I would like to have a similarly clever idea how to define SemiCircular Flight Level Rules. Unfortunately I did not succeed to ignite a contest of ideas in www.avweb.com via the QuestionOfTheWeek (qotw). Obviously, U.S.Americans resist international needs. -- --Peter Hermann(49)0711-685-3611 fax3758 --Pfaffenwaldring 27 Raum 114, D-70569 Stuttgart Uni Computeranwendungen --http://www.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de/homes/ph/ --Team Ada: "C'mon people let the world begin" (Paul McCartney) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:50:59 +0000 (UTC), Peter Hermann
wrote: In misc.metric-system Julian Scarfe wrote: Pilots have become accustomed to using feet for altitude. Can you imagine As a european pilot I would prefer meters. But how to rearrange separation standards, any ideas? 1/3rds of kilometers. -- Jim Riley |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 05:09 AM |
GWB and the Air Guard | JD | Military Aviation | 77 | March 17th 04 10:52 AM |
Crosswind components | James L. Freeman | Piloting | 25 | February 29th 04 01:21 AM |
RV-7a baggage area | David Smith | Home Built | 32 | December 15th 03 04:08 AM |
A-4 / A-7 Question | Tank Fixer | Military Aviation | 135 | October 25th 03 03:59 AM |