A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

units of measurement on altimeters



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 8th 04, 03:59 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Peter Hermann wrote:

As a european pilot I would prefer meters.
But how to rearrange separation standards, any ideas?


Use 300 meters for every 1,000'. That's a little less separation, but it wouldn't
be too hard for a pilot to deal with the arithmetic.

George Patterson
Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would
not yield to the tongue.
  #2  
Old March 8th 04, 05:56 PM
Markus Kuhn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"G.R. Patterson III" writes:
Peter Hermann wrote:
As a european pilot I would prefer meters.
But how to rearrange separation standards, any ideas?


Use 300 meters for every 1,000'. That's a little less
separation, but it wouldn't be too hard for a pilot to
deal with the arithmetic.


If flight levels were named in meters and were all a multiple
of 300 m, this might even add an additional communications-safety
mechanism:

In all valid flight levels, the sum of all digits would
always be divisible by three.

This adds a bit of healthy redundancy to a figure that needs
to be communicated without ambiguity over noisy radio channels.
Getting a single digit wrong would be spotted with 60%
probability. Almost as good as adding a check digit.

Markus

  #3  
Old March 9th 04, 09:44 AM
Peter Hermann
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In misc.metric-system Markus Kuhn wrote:
If flight levels were named in meters and were all a multiple
of 300 m, this might even add an additional communications-safety
mechanism:


In all valid flight levels, the sum of all digits would
always be divisible by three.


This adds a bit of healthy redundancy to a figure that needs
to be communicated without ambiguity over noisy radio channels.
Getting a single digit wrong would be spotted with 60%
probability. Almost as good as adding a check digit.


Subsequently I would like to have a similarly clever idea
how to define SemiCircular Flight Level Rules.
Unfortunately I did not succeed to ignite a contest of ideas
in www.avweb.com via the QuestionOfTheWeek (qotw).
Obviously, U.S.Americans resist international needs.

--
--Peter Hermann(49)0711-685-3611 fax3758
--Pfaffenwaldring 27 Raum 114, D-70569 Stuttgart Uni Computeranwendungen
--http://www.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de/homes/ph/
--Team Ada: "C'mon people let the world begin" (Paul McCartney)
  #4  
Old March 21st 04, 06:00 AM
Jim Riley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:50:59 +0000 (UTC), Peter Hermann
wrote:

In misc.metric-system Julian Scarfe wrote:
Pilots have become accustomed to using feet for altitude. Can you imagine


As a european pilot I would prefer meters.
But how to rearrange separation standards, any ideas?


1/3rds of kilometers.

--
Jim Riley
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) Anonymous Spamless Military Aviation 0 April 21st 04 05:09 AM
GWB and the Air Guard JD Military Aviation 77 March 17th 04 10:52 AM
Crosswind components James L. Freeman Piloting 25 February 29th 04 01:21 AM
RV-7a baggage area David Smith Home Built 32 December 15th 03 04:08 AM
A-4 / A-7 Question Tank Fixer Military Aviation 135 October 25th 03 03:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.