![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
link.net... Sounds like a nightmare to me. I've zeroed the needle on occasion for demonstration work, but I just don't get the logic behind the QFE lobby. It's just one more thing to worry about changing, and that can lead to serious problems in the air. I'm a standardization buff. Making as much a constant as opposed to a variable when it comes to flying has always seemed to me the best way to go with things. Having several MORE ways to use an altimeter just adds to normal altimeter confusion; it;s just one more thing that someone can forget to set or change or figure out. Others have explained that the use of QFE works in the UK because there are few or no airfields above 2000ft (and tropical depressions are rare). I've flown there with instructors who knew what we do in the US, and took care to explain what they are doing and why. Resetting from QNH to QFE *in the vicinity of an airport* is part of the procedure when receiving the ATIS or whatever advisory is available, just as it is for us in the US (I always check, and reset if necessary, when hearing an ATIS - don't you?) and the QFE is one phrase in the report so it's not easy to forget. The extra step for a student is more than repaid by not having to do the arithmetic in the pattern. You're a standardization buff, and it sounds like a standard procedure to me. It's just part of the approach checklist. And, if you count them up, there is one more variable (twist the altimeter) and a lot more constants (pattern-related altitudes). Remember also that many UK pilots get pretty quickly into the flight levels, so there's a need to twist to QNE as well. -- David Brooks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How do you do that? Is there weather reporting at all airports? I can see
setting to field elevation if you're returning to your original point of departure (I did that all the time in my ultralight), but how do you set it at a different field without knowing either the Kollsman setting or your height above ground? Guestimate? mike regish ----- Original Message ----- From: "ShawnD2112" Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 2:39 PM Subject: Who's flying out of the higest elev airport? Here in the UK, setting the altimeter to field elevation, QFE, before takeoff is not only allowed, it's taught and expected. Likewise, when approaching the airfield, you're expected to reset the altimeter to that airfield's QFE in the pattern. In the States, we would think that would lead to all kinds of altitude-related accidents. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not guestimate. Most airfields have some sort of radio control or
information from the ground. Standard procedure is to give all arriving aircraft the active runway and QFE so you've got the data and a reminder to reset your altimeter. If there's no radio manned to give you the information, you just stick with your enroute QNH and do the mental arithmetic just like in the States. It sounds daft, and I thought it was when I first started flying here, but you soon get used to it. I don't really have a problem and, actually, since I spend most of my time in a Pitts below 3,000 practicing sequences, I usually leave it on QFE in the local area because I'm more concerned about my height above ground and it's pretty flat around the airport. In fact, depending on where I'm flying to in the UK, the land can be so flat that I just leave it on QFE enroute. I fly around other airports and generally keep out of everyones' way so it's not ever been a problem. I also only fly in pretty good VMC, so the actual altimeter reading in my case isn't terribly critical in most cases. Shawn "mike regish" wrote in message news:LaQ3c.742$bP2.13474@attbi_s53... How do you do that? Is there weather reporting at all airports? I can see setting to field elevation if you're returning to your original point of departure (I did that all the time in my ultralight), but how do you set it at a different field without knowing either the Kollsman setting or your height above ground? Guestimate? mike regish ----- Original Message ----- From: "ShawnD2112" Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 2:39 PM Subject: Who's flying out of the higest elev airport? Here in the UK, setting the altimeter to field elevation, QFE, before takeoff is not only allowed, it's taught and expected. Likewise, when approaching the airfield, you're expected to reset the altimeter to that airfield's QFE in the pattern. In the States, we would think that would lead to all kinds of altitude-related accidents. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley,
if it's still useful for the number game ;*) ... Here at LAM (7171ft, for 30.54) I get 4850ft for 28.1 Cheers Chris PP-ASEL Student Glider Pilot New Mexico Dudley Henriques wrote: Hey, you mountain types out there :-) I'm doing some research on a safety issue and need your help . I need a post from someone flying out of Colorado somewhere, preferably Telluride or a field very close to Telluride. I need as close to the highest elevation in the U.S. as I can get. I'm not dealing with this issue in the context of right or wrong as it pertains to mountain flying. I need to know if the Kollsman window in your altimeters has a wide enough range to allow you, IF YOU DESIRED TO DO SO, to set your altimeters to 0 elevation on a consistent basis before take off at your field instead of a MSL setting. Again, I'm only interested in the possibility, not the right and wrongs involved with doing this. Thanks, Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the z's with e's. dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
"Dudley Henriques" wrote: Hey, you mountain types out there :-) I'm doing some research on a safety issue and need your help . I need a post from someone flying out of Colorado somewhere, preferably Telluride or a field very close to Telluride. I need as close to the highest elevation in the U.S. as I can get. I'm not dealing with this issue in the context of right or wrong as it pertains to mountain flying. I need to know if the Kollsman window in your altimeters has a wide enough range to allow you, IF YOU DESIRED TO DO SO, to set your altimeters to 0 elevation on a consistent basis before take off at your field instead of a MSL setting. Again, I'm only interested in the possibility, not the right and wrongs involved with doing this. Thanks, Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the z's with e's. dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt I think AAL was the last major to set QFE for takeoff and landings. They special ordered altimeters that would handle Mexico City. -- Ron |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder if having the extra raw data QFE monitor by the FO on approach was
worth the cost of retrofitting the airplanes? I understand in the end they crap canned the idea anyway. Dudley "Ron Parsons" wrote in message ... In article et, "Dudley Henriques" wrote: Hey, you mountain types out there :-) I'm doing some research on a safety issue and need your help . I need a post from someone flying out of Colorado somewhere, preferably Telluride or a field very close to Telluride. I need as close to the highest elevation in the U.S. as I can get. I'm not dealing with this issue in the context of right or wrong as it pertains to mountain flying. I need to know if the Kollsman window in your altimeters has a wide enough range to allow you, IF YOU DESIRED TO DO SO, to set your altimeters to 0 elevation on a consistent basis before take off at your field instead of a MSL setting. Again, I'm only interested in the possibility, not the right and wrongs involved with doing this. Thanks, Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the z's with e's. dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt I think AAL was the last major to set QFE for takeoff and landings. They special ordered altimeters that would handle Mexico City. -- Ron |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article k.net,
"Dudley Henriques" wrote: I wonder if having the extra raw data QFE monitor by the FO on approach was worth the cost of retrofitting the airplanes? I understand in the end they crap canned the idea anyway. The bean counters wouldn't come up with the money to modify the 777 plus there were some South American airports that were too high. Both the Capt and the F/O were on QFE for take off and landing. The change over was at about 6000 AFL. There was a 3rd altimeter in the middle of the panel which remained on QNH. All three went to QNE above the Transition Altitude. Technically, you are correct that they changed "in the end", but that was after 75 yrs in which the 3 altimeter system kept aluminum and dirt separated quite nicely. -- Ron |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, it wouldn't work. Note that 1" of pressure in the Kollsman window
changes the displayed altitude by 1000 feed. So, at Leadville, Colorado (9927 MSL), effectively 10,000 feet, you would need to move the Kollsman window from 30.00 to 20.00 inches. Nope, it doesn't go that low. Jer/ Eberhard, Colorado Mountain type. Dudley Henriques wrote: Hey, you mountain types out there :-) I'm doing some research on a safety issue and need your help . I need a post from someone flying out of Colorado somewhere, preferably Telluride or a field very close to Telluride. I need as close to the highest elevation in the U.S. as I can get. I'm not dealing with this issue in the context of right or wrong as it pertains to mountain flying. I need to know if the Kollsman window in your altimeters has a wide enough range to allow you, IF YOU DESIRED TO DO SO, to set your altimeters to 0 elevation on a consistent basis before take off at your field instead of a MSL setting. Again, I'm only interested in the possibility, not the right and wrongs involved with doing this. Thanks, Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the z's with e's. dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt Best regards, Jer/ "Flight instruction and mountain flying are my vocation!" Eberhard -- Jer/ (Slash) Eberhard, Mountain Flying Aviation, LTD, Ft Collins, CO CELL 970 231-6325 EMAIL jer'at'frii.com WEB http://users.frii.com/jer/ C-206 N9513G, CFII Airplane&Glider, FAA-DEN Aviation Safety Counselor CAP-CO Mission&Aircraft CheckPilot, BM218 HAM N0FZD, 197 Young Eagles! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dudley Henriques" writes:
Hey, you mountain types out there :-) I'm doing some research on a safety issue and need your help . I need a post from someone flying out of Colorado somewhere, preferably Telluride or a field very close to Telluride. I need as close to the highest elevation in the U.S. as I can get. Talk to the chopper pilots. Here are the high 20 landing facilities in the US. 1 CD37, EMPIRE, COLORADO, 12442 2 CD21, TARRYALL, COLORADO, 11294 3 CD38, FAIRPLAY, COLORADO, 11104 4 CD52, MOUNT PRINCETON, COLORADO, 10858 5 CD19, IDAHO SPRINGS, COLORADO, 10672 6 CD78, WOLF CREEK, COLORADO, 10634 7 CD41, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO, 10603 8 CD70, STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, COLORADO, 10554 9 CO51, EMPIRE, COLORADO, 10400 10 CD25, BERTHOUD FALLS, COLORADO, 10340 11 01CO, LEADVILLE, COLORADO, 10175 12 CD74, VAIL, COLORADO, 10116 13 CD43, GRANITE, COLORADO, 10093 14 CO75, BRECKENRIDGE, COLORADO, 10085 15 CD44, HESPERUS, COLORADO, 10039 16 CD54, NORWOOD, COLORADO, 9943 17 1CO6, PALISADE, COLORADO, 9940 18 LXV, LEADVILLE, COLORADO, 9927 19 CD72, TRIMBLE, COLORADO, 9873 20 77CO, JEFFERSON, COLORADO, 9869 Way off topic...but perhaps amusing to those reading this thread. http://www.startribune.com/stories/1752/3406421.html A Red Cross supervisor said in 1993 that he didn't want to fly anymore with an Aviation Charter pilot whom he said ignored air traffic control advisories on how to avoid a thunderstorm. The pilot, he said, took the plane up to 12,500 feet and told him it was a violation of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rules to be in an unpressurized cabin at that height. Whether the pilot was violating FAA regulations is unclear. --kyler |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote:
I need to know if the Kollsman window in your altimeters has a wide enough range to allow you, IF YOU DESIRED TO DO SO, to set your altimeters to 0 elevation on a consistent basis before take off at your field instead of a MSL setting. This is not as close from Colorado as what you expected, but in France, the highest airport elevation is well over 8000ft. You cannot set your altimeter to 0 at such an altitude. We have many airports like this here, where the runway is not flat but on the contrary has a steep slope. You use it to land (up the slope) or to take off (down the slope). To use such an airport, you must hold a special "mountain" rating and must have learnt to land and take off on such a special airfield. No go around there because the ground goes up faster than your aircraft. http://flyinfrance.free.fr/apt/isola.htm and http://flyinfrance.free.fr/apt/apt.htm -- TThierry __|__ http://flyinfrance.free.fr \___(x)___/ ! ! ! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 12 | July 14th 04 06:05 PM |
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 12:07 AM |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |
Airport Manager position, Fitchburg, MA | David Reinhart | Piloting | 6 | August 12th 03 11:46 PM |