A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AOPA Flight Planner - I preferred the earlier one



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 20th 04, 01:45 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

AOPA's flight planner was introduced to give users better ability to plot
TFRs than what the old DUATS flight planner had. It was written by Jeppesen
and is the same software that the FAA uses to plot TFRs. It is based on
Jeppesen's FliteStar software and had the TFR plotting ability even before
FliteStar had it.

However, like all freeware, I suspect it is deliberately crippled so as to
not affect FliteStar's sales.

8NC8 is in the database for both FliteStar and the AOPA flight planner. For
some reason the AOPA flight planner will not let you use it, although you
can see it plotted on the chart if you zoom in enough. You can click on it
and get the information about it.

7 NM NE of Durham, NC (Durham County)

N 36° 03.6' W 78° 47.0' Magnetic Variation: 9.1°W

Elevation: 309'

Cincinnati Sectional

Owner: Private, Permitted Use: Private

Position Estimated, Elevation Surveyed


It looks like a bug (in the software -- the airport does not look like a
bug). There is no problem including it in FlightStar flight plans, so this
is a peculiarity of the crippled AOPA version. I kind of wonder if the AOPA
software treats all private airports like this? It will not allow WA96 (Port
Orchard, WA), either. Maybe the lawyers got hold of it and worried about
liability.

Several people have mentioned Cirrus flight planning software. Cirrus is
going away. A free standalone replacement called "Golden Eagle FlightPrep"
has been developed by the same people who developed Cirrus, but I could not
find on their web site what the operating requirements will be. It will be
formally introduced in April at Sun n Fun. Cirrus was not developed by
DUATS, but both Cirrus and Golden Eagle FlightPrep are promoted on the DUATS
web site.

An online version of FlightPrep is available by paid subscription. It will
run on either Mac or Windows environments. The Mac notice has a disclaimer
that says "check computer requirements," but they don't seem to have posted
anywhere what those computer requirements are. It looks like the online
version compares favorably with Aeroplanner. They give a discount to AOPA
members.

www.flightprep.com



  #2  
Old March 20th 04, 05:08 AM
Jim Fisher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Maule Driver" wrote in message
I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to run
it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's
Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights).


Fer what it's worth, Aeroplanner is incredible. I don't see it mentioned
here much anymore. The owner of the site used to post here a lot. In
Aeroplanner's infancy, he solicited our feedback and, more importantly,
acted almost immediately on that feedback in order to make it better.

Y'all all think AOPA and DUATs and anyone else in aviation ought to provide
a user friendly, multi-platform, accurate planner at absolutely no cost to
you and damn the cost to the developer. Well, all that's available at
Aeroplanner but you gotta pay for it.

You get what you pay for.

8NC8 is there, by the way.

--
Jim Fisher


  #3  
Old March 21st 04, 03:19 AM
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Fisher wrote:

Well, all that's available at
Aeroplanner but you gotta pay for it.

You get what you pay for.


Someone else mentioned Aeroplanner. I read around on the web site, and the
product certainly does look interesting. I'm probably going to buy a month
of premium shortly to give it a shot.

Thanks for the recommendation.

- Andrew


  #4  
Old March 20th 04, 07:36 PM
Aviv Hod
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Maule Driver" wrote in message
...
I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to run
it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's
Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights).

What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is not

in
the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow me
plan a flight to and from it. A minor but irritating problem. It wasn't

a
problem with the earlier tool.

Going to have to call them since there doesn't seem to be any online help

or
support on the topic.



The AOPA tool seems to not let you plan directly to private airstrips, but
you can easily modify any route it comes up with. In your case, just flight
plan to KRDU, then drag the end point to 8NC8. It's in the database, you
just need to zoom in to find it. Dragging the endpoint seems to update the
navlog correctly as well. Does that solve the problem?

-Aviv


  #5  
Old March 20th 04, 09:06 PM
Maule Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Aviv Hod" . ccom wrote in
message ...

"Maule Driver" wrote in message
...
I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to

run
it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's
Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights).

What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is

not
in
the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow

me
plan a flight to and from it. A minor but irritating problem. It

wasn't
a
problem with the earlier tool.

Going to have to call them since there doesn't seem to be any online

help
or
support on the topic.



The AOPA tool seems to not let you plan directly to private airstrips, but
you can easily modify any route it comes up with. In your case, just

flight
plan to KRDU, then drag the end point to 8NC8. It's in the database, you
just need to zoom in to find it. Dragging the endpoint seems to update

the
navlog correctly as well. Does that solve the problem?

I believe it would. I'm going to try it. Thanks.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 Mark Oliver Aerobatics 1 October 5th 04 10:20 PM
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP vvcd Home Built 0 September 22nd 04 07:16 PM
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots [email protected] Owning 9 April 1st 04 02:54 AM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Piloting 133 November 12th 03 08:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.