![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
ATC radar's (at least they used to when I was working them) show you on
"assigned altitude" when you are within +/-200ft.. so if you are assigned 9000 it will say "90C"... if you are still climbing to that altitude it will say 90 "up-arrow" 87, or 8700 climbing to 9000 assigned. the "traffic alert" on the ATC system is geared to the 90C, if you are at 9300 it will show 90 "arrow" 93 and if there is a traffic conflict at 10,000 it will "alert" the controller. Then he may "bust you", but if it's a momentary deviation and no other traffic is involved, the controller may query and ask your altitude to verify that his read out is correct. If you say, level 90, Then he may offer up a new altimeter setting to you, or just tell you that he sees 9300, as a hint that he is watching, or that you need to get it looked at. If your altimeter setting is not set to "local", his computer radar will misinterpret the altitude ModeC information from your aircraft. All controllers verify altitude readouts on the radar display on initial contact, whether you call in, "out of 8500 for 9000" or, "level 9000", he compares to what he sees on his data. If you do not offer up an altitude, or in the case of an "IFR pickup" in the air, he will ask altitude leaving or verify alt so he can compare his data. BT "Magnus" wrote in message ... I thought it was +/- 200 feet before you've violated if you are flying IFR, but someone just told me it's a 100 feet, which seems a little steep considering they use 1000 feet separations. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Catastrophic Decompression; Small Place Solo | Aviation | Piloting | 193 | January 13th 04 09:52 PM |
| GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 01:39 AM |
| GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Piloting | 38 | October 5th 03 01:39 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 02:27 PM |