A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Media screws up again...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 12th 04, 12:25 AM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news:8Qqyc.11503$eu.989@attbi_s02...

Because we pilots insist on speaking a secret language that uses

everyday
words like "stall" to mean something completely different from what the
other 99.8% of the population means by the word. If we want to be
understood, why don't we just speak English?


My English dictionary includes the definition "a condition in which an
aircraft or airfoil experiences an interruption of airflow resulting in

loss
of lift and a tendency to drop" for "stall".


True, it's a recognized technical meaning. But it's still obscure and
confusing--especially since nothing in the dictionary lets anyone know that
the more common meaning (for an engine to stop inadvertently) is never used
by pilots with regard to an airplane's engine.

--Gary


  #2  
Old June 12th 04, 12:28 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news:wbryc.11638$eu.9579@attbi_s02...

True, it's a recognized technical meaning. But it's still obscure and
confusing--especially since nothing in the dictionary lets anyone know

that
the more common meaning (for an engine to stop inadvertently) is never

used
by pilots with regard to an airplane's engine.


It's in a standard dictionary, and no more technical than the definition
immediately preceding it, "the sudden, unintended loss of power or
effectiveness in an engine." Perhaps the problem is the rather limited
vocabulary of most journalists?


  #3  
Old June 14th 04, 09:19 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message

It's in a standard dictionary, and no more technical than the definition
immediately preceding it, "the sudden, unintended loss of power or
effectiveness in an engine." Perhaps the problem is the rather limited
vocabulary of most journalists?


Most pilots suck too. I mean, explain turbulence. I done flew lots of
times on them big 707s and whatnot. It's all, you know, bounce bounce
bounce. I mean, Jethro, I ain't no pilot or nothin' but, dang, how come
them airplanes is always a-crashin' and whatnot?

Why, *I* could fly the dern plane better than that. I just don't want to is
all.

-c



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
Driving sheet-metal screws into 4130 Grandpa B. Home Built 10 February 3rd 04 07:23 PM
Bothersome Phillips Head Screws Larry Smith Home Built 48 January 10th 04 04:26 AM
MEDIA ADVISORY ON 767A REPORT TO CONGRESS Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 July 11th 03 09:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.