![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Paul Tomblin) wrote in
: In a previous article, FullName said: (Paul Tomblin) wrote in : At least you didn't commit the "crime" of photographing a bridge while black. See http://69.93.170.43/ that guy is a nut-ball. he is on the far left frindge of radical socialists... look at his website... http://www.brownequalsterrorist.com/ Funny, I thought this country had a constitution protecting your right to freedom of speech, and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. I guess I was wrong. Being "on the far left frindge(sic) of radical socialists" is not grounds for being threatened by multiple police just because you took a picture of a public structure. And to ask a middle eastern man on a expired visa to why hes learning to only fly a airplane and not land or take off was a Racial insult on Sept 10th. Things are different now and when you fit the profile and what can appear to be casing a major structure Im damn happy someone is walking up and asking a few questions. free speech is constitutionaly protected only when it infriges on my God given rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And being that the socialist wish to remove our Republic and want to replace it with a their form of opression does in fact qualify them to be interrorgated on the street. and I quote "The American way to Bill of Rights socialism by Gus Hall, National Chair, Communist Party USA This article was reprinted from the July 26, 1997 issue of the People's Weekly World. For subscription information see below. All rights reserved - may be used with PWW credits. We Communists believe that socialism is the very best replacement for a capitalist system that has served its purpose but no longer meets the needs and requirements of the great majority of our people. We believe that Socialism USA will be built according to the traditions, history, culture and conditions of the United States. Thus, it will be different than any other socialist society in the world. It will be uniquely American. " |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey folks. Just ignore Mr. FullName...he's clearly a nut-ball with
fascist, extreme right beliefs. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, FullName said:
free speech is constitutionaly protected only when it infriges on my God given rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And you don't think 8 policemen with their hands on their guns was infringing on this guy's right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? He sounded pretty unhappy to me. And being that the socialist wish to remove our Republic and want to replace it with a their form of opression does in fact qualify them to be interrorgated on the street. You know, if facist overreaction like yours wasn't the biggest threat to the constitution, you'd be laughably contemptable. As it is, you're only contemptable. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "I picked up a Magic 8-Ball the other day and it said 'Outlook not so good.' I said, 'Sure, but Microsoft still ships it.'" - unk. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
Funny, I thought this country had a constitution protecting your right to freedom of speech, and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. I guess I was wrong. No, you're not wrong. You just forgot that the same protection applies to those who want to call a web site "the far left frindge(sic) of radical socialists". -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 ____________________ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "John T" said:
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message Funny, I thought this country had a constitution protecting your right to freedom of speech, and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. I guess I was wrong. No, you're not wrong. You just forgot that the same protection applies to those who want to call a web site "the far left frindge(sic) of radical socialists". I wasn't denying the anonymous coward's right to call the site "the far left frindge(sic) of radical socialists". I was saying that even if the guy with the web site *was* on "the far left frindge(sic) of radical socialists" (and if you conclude that that from that particular blog, then so am I and most of my friends), that doesn't abrogate his right to take pictures of a tourist attraction without being threatened by 8 police, including three "federal agents from Homeland Security". -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ If netcat is compiled with -DGAPING_SECURITY_HOLE, the -e argument specifies a program to exec after making or receiving a successful connection. -- netcat README file |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"FullName" wrote in message
... that guy is a nut-ball. he is on the far left frindge of radical socialists... look at his website... http://www.brownequalsterrorist.com/ I looked. Where's the "far left frindge [sic] of radical socialists" content? All I could find were legitimate concerns regarding the rampant loss of civil rights in this country. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() that guy is a nut-ball. he is on the far left frindge of radical socialists... look at his website... http://www.brownequalsterrorist.com/ I looked. Where's the "far left frindge [sic] of radical socialists" content? All I could find were legitimate concerns regarding the rampant loss of civil rights in this country. I'd like to know where you got this too! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() FullName wrote: that guy is a nut-ball. he is on the far left frindge of radical socialists... look at his website... J. Edgar! I thought you were dead! George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow, sounds like the Gestapo is alive an well... can vee haf your
papers?? Vee must haf your papers komrade! (Paul Tomblin) wrote in message ... In a previous article, Nomen Nescio ] said: Well, I guess I made the list of suspected terrorists, this weekend. At least you didn't commit the "crime" of photographing a bridge while black. See http://69.93.170.43/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote in message ...
Nomen Nescio wrote: "You have to leave, NOW, sir!", he replied sternly. Now this brings up an interesting question. Are we, as US citizens on public land during peacetime, required to abide by the orders of military personnel? On what grounds did he have authority over your actions and location? Did you vote for George W. Bush in 2000? I did, much to my chagrin. -- O.M. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Friendly fire" | Mike | Naval Aviation | 3 | April 6th 04 06:07 PM |
"Friendly fire" | Mike | Military Aviation | 0 | March 19th 04 02:36 PM |
B-52 crew blamed for friendly fire death | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 0 | March 16th 04 12:49 AM |
U.S. won't have to reveal other friendly fire events: Schmidt's lawyers hoped to use other incidents to help their case | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 18th 03 08:44 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |