A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Greetings from your friendly, neighborhood, TERRORIST!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 29th 04, 01:39 AM
FullName
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Paul Tomblin) wrote in
:

In a previous article, FullName said:
(Paul Tomblin) wrote in
:
At least you didn't commit the "crime" of photographing a bridge
while black. See http://69.93.170.43/


that guy is a nut-ball. he is on the far left frindge of radical
socialists... look at his website...
http://www.brownequalsterrorist.com/


Funny, I thought this country had a constitution protecting your right
to freedom of speech, and freedom from unreasonable search and
seizure. I guess I was wrong.

Being "on the far left frindge(sic) of radical socialists" is not
grounds for being threatened by multiple police just because you took
a picture of a public structure.


And to ask a middle eastern man on a expired visa to why hes learning to
only fly a airplane and not land or take off was a Racial insult on Sept
10th.

Things are different now and when you fit the profile and what can
appear to be casing a major structure Im damn happy someone is walking
up and asking a few questions.

free speech is constitutionaly protected only when it infriges on my God
given rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

And being that the socialist wish to remove our Republic and want to
replace it with a their form of opression does in fact qualify them to
be interrorgated on the street.

and I quote "The American way to Bill of Rights socialism
by Gus Hall, National Chair, Communist Party USA
This article was reprinted from the July 26, 1997 issue of the People's

Weekly World. For subscription information see below. All rights
reserved - may be used with PWW credits.


We Communists believe that socialism is the very best replacement for a
capitalist system that has served its purpose but no longer meets the
needs and requirements of the great majority of our people.

We believe that Socialism USA will be built according to the traditions,
history, culture and conditions of the United States. Thus, it will be
different than any other socialist society in the world. It will be
uniquely American. "

  #2  
Old September 29th 04, 02:34 AM
Bob Fry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hey folks. Just ignore Mr. FullName...he's clearly a nut-ball with
fascist, extreme right beliefs.

  #3  
Old September 29th 04, 02:49 AM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, FullName said:
free speech is constitutionaly protected only when it infriges on my God
given rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.


And you don't think 8 policemen with their hands on their guns was
infringing on this guy's right to life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness? He sounded pretty unhappy to me.

And being that the socialist wish to remove our Republic and want to
replace it with a their form of opression does in fact qualify them to
be interrorgated on the street.


You know, if facist overreaction like yours wasn't the biggest threat to
the constitution, you'd be laughably contemptable. As it is, you're only
contemptable.

--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
"I picked up a Magic 8-Ball the other day and it said 'Outlook not so
good.' I said, 'Sure, but Microsoft still ships it.'" - unk.
  #4  
Old September 29th 04, 12:41 PM
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message


Funny, I thought this country had a constitution protecting your
right to freedom of speech, and freedom from unreasonable search and
seizure. I guess I was wrong.


No, you're not wrong. You just forgot that the same protection applies to
those who want to call a web site "the far left frindge(sic) of radical
socialists".

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________


  #5  
Old September 29th 04, 03:23 PM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, "John T" said:
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message


Funny, I thought this country had a constitution protecting your
right to freedom of speech, and freedom from unreasonable search and
seizure. I guess I was wrong.


No, you're not wrong. You just forgot that the same protection applies to
those who want to call a web site "the far left frindge(sic) of radical
socialists".


I wasn't denying the anonymous coward's right to call the site "the far
left frindge(sic) of radical socialists". I was saying that even if the
guy with the web site *was* on "the far left frindge(sic) of radical
socialists" (and if you conclude that that from that particular blog, then
so am I and most of my friends), that doesn't abrogate his right to take
pictures of a tourist attraction without being threatened by 8 police,
including three "federal agents from Homeland Security".


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
If netcat is compiled with -DGAPING_SECURITY_HOLE, the -e argument
specifies a program to exec after making or receiving a successful
connection. -- netcat README file
  #6  
Old September 28th 04, 06:54 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"FullName" wrote in message
...
that guy is a nut-ball. he is on the far left frindge of radical
socialists... look at his website...

http://www.brownequalsterrorist.com/


I looked. Where's the "far left frindge [sic] of radical socialists"
content? All I could find were legitimate concerns regarding the rampant
loss of civil rights in this country.


  #7  
Old September 28th 04, 07:18 PM
John Harlow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


that guy is a nut-ball. he is on the far left frindge of radical
socialists... look at his website...

http://www.brownequalsterrorist.com/


I looked. Where's the "far left frindge [sic] of radical socialists"
content? All I could find were legitimate concerns regarding the
rampant loss of civil rights in this country.


I'd like to know where you got this too!


  #8  
Old September 28th 04, 07:19 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



FullName wrote:

that guy is a nut-ball. he is on the far left frindge of radical
socialists... look at his website...


J. Edgar! I thought you were dead!

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #9  
Old September 28th 04, 08:56 PM
Dean Wilkinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wow, sounds like the Gestapo is alive an well... can vee haf your
papers?? Vee must haf your papers komrade!


(Paul Tomblin) wrote in message ...
In a previous article, Nomen Nescio ] said:
Well, I guess I made the list of suspected terrorists, this weekend.


At least you didn't commit the "crime" of photographing a bridge while
black. See http://69.93.170.43/

  #10  
Old September 28th 04, 02:16 PM
Otis McNatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter R. wrote in message ...
Nomen Nescio wrote:

"You have to leave, NOW, sir!", he replied sternly.


Now this brings up an interesting question. Are we, as US citizens on
public land during peacetime, required to abide by the orders of
military personnel?

On what grounds did he have authority over your actions and location?


Did you vote for George W. Bush in 2000? I did, much to my chagrin.

--
O.M.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Friendly fire" Mike Naval Aviation 3 April 6th 04 06:07 PM
"Friendly fire" Mike Military Aviation 0 March 19th 04 02:36 PM
B-52 crew blamed for friendly fire death Paul Hirose Military Aviation 0 March 16th 04 12:49 AM
U.S. won't have to reveal other friendly fire events: Schmidt's lawyers hoped to use other incidents to help their case Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 18th 03 08:44 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.