![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
gatt wrote:
Hey, all. Haven't shot instrument approaches in a complex aircraft yet, and I'm getting ready to so I'm curious: When you're doing a practice approach in which you know it's going to be missed, do you complete/amend/ignore the GUMPS check? I'm guessing yes, but I'm curious as to what others do. Finishing up my complex endorsement this afternoon, but haven't done any approaches in that plane yet. I always do the GUMPS check. I almost always do a touch-and-go out of a practice approach. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Landing checklist completed prior to arrival at the Final Approach Fix.
Gear, flaps and power setting are FAF configuation items to provide consistant, stable approaches. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jsmith" wrote in message ... Landing checklist completed prior to arrival at the Final Approach Fix. Very useful! thanks. Gear, flaps and power setting are FAF configuation items to provide consistant, stable approaches. -c |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:15:04 -0800, "gatt"
wrote: Hey, all. Haven't shot instrument approaches in a complex aircraft yet, and I'm getting ready to so I'm curious: When you're doing a practice approach in which you know it's going to be missed, do you complete/amend/ignore the GUMPS check? I'm guessing yes, but I'm curious as to what others do. Finishing up my complex endorsement this afternoon, but haven't done any approaches in that plane yet. Don't skip anything. The reason why we train is so that you build muscle memory as well. It comes in handy when the S*$% gets deep and your mind is having to concentrate so hard, that you want some things to come "Naturally". If you start making adjustments to how you would normally do something because you know your are going around, you are training you mind to that which could potentially cause problems down the road. Always complete the GUMPS when you normally do it and then when its time to go around do the 5 C's. Scott D To email remove spamcatcher |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
why would you intentionally have the aircraft configured for an approach
that you are not used to. In the Bonanza, and in the Arrow, having the aircraft trimmed for level flight at approach speed, and then extending the gear at the FAF makes for a nice transition to the 500-600fpm required to capture and maintain the glide slope on the local ILS. BT "gatt" wrote in message ... Hey, all. Haven't shot instrument approaches in a complex aircraft yet, and I'm getting ready to so I'm curious: When you're doing a practice approach in which you know it's going to be missed, do you complete/amend/ignore the GUMPS check? I'm guessing yes, but I'm curious as to what others do. Finishing up my complex endorsement this afternoon, but haven't done any approaches in that plane yet. -c |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But... I teach a "keep your forward speed up" that we seem to always get
. You need to know the plane's very different feel if keeping on glide slope with gear up. Also multiple GUMPS checks on all approaches make you check on short final DA+200 ft. for example. BTIZ wrote: why would you intentionally have the aircraft configured for an approach that you are not used to. In the Bonanza, and in the Arrow, having the aircraft trimmed for level flight at approach speed, and then extending the gear at the FAF makes for a nice transition to the 500-600fpm required to capture and maintain the glide slope on the local ILS. BT "gatt" wrote in message ... Hey, all. Haven't shot instrument approaches in a complex aircraft yet, and I'm getting ready to so I'm curious: When you're doing a practice approach in which you know it's going to be missed, do you complete/amend/ignore the GUMPS check? I'm guessing yes, but I'm curious as to what others do. Finishing up my complex endorsement this afternoon, but haven't done any approaches in that plane yet. -c |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill J" wrote in message
... But... I teach a "keep your forward speed up" that we seem to always get . You need to know the plane's very different feel if keeping on glide slope with gear up. Also multiple GUMPS checks on all approaches make you check on short final DA+200 ft. for example. agreed.. and on "most" aircraft... once you've for the gear down.. you can speed up to max gear extended speed, not gear extension speed.. had that happen to me in a Seneca II, slowed to a nice 110knt approach and approach control decided that was not fast enough.. so on glide path.. speeding up.. and retracting flaps.. able to leave the flap lever at 1 notch, 160knt speed.. and left the gear down.. 150knt speed.. nice exercise to change configuration and drag while still tracking the loc/glideslope BT |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The most important thing for your CFII to teach you on an instrument approach is how to find the power/prop settings that result in your approach being at the exact speed you plan for (we plan 90kt in the Mooney as well as a configuration for 130kts when necessary). All these power settings would be out the window if you flew with the gear up. I usually have the student put the gear down at the point of the initial let down on a non-pre approach and on GS intercept on a pre approach. -Robert, CFI gatt wrote: Hey, all. Haven't shot instrument approaches in a complex aircraft yet, and I'm getting ready to so I'm curious: When you're doing a practice approach in which you know it's going to be missed, do you complete/amend/ignore the GUMPS check? I'm guessing yes, but I'm curious as to what others do. Finishing up my complex endorsement this afternoon, but haven't done any approaches in that plane yet. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can't fly 130 knots with gear down in an Arrow
Robert M. Gary wrote: The most important thing for your CFII to teach you on an instrument approach is how to find the power/prop settings that result in your approach being at the exact speed you plan for (we plan 90kt in the Mooney as well as a configuration for 130kts when necessary). All these power settings would be out the window if you flew with the gear up. I usually have the student put the gear down at the point of the initial let down on a non-pre approach and on GS intercept on a pre approach. -Robert, CFI gatt wrote: Hey, all. Haven't shot instrument approaches in a complex aircraft yet, and I'm getting ready to so I'm curious: When you're doing a practice approach in which you know it's going to be missed, do you complete/amend/ignore the GUMPS check? I'm guessing yes, but I'm curious as to what others do. Finishing up my complex endorsement this afternoon, but haven't done any approaches in that plane yet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS/WAAS VNAV approaches and runway length | Nathan Young | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | October 25th 04 06:16 PM |
What approaches are in a database? | Ross | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | January 4th 04 07:57 PM |
Logging instrument approaches | Slav Inger | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | July 27th 03 11:00 PM |
Suppose We Really Do Have Only GPS Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 20th 03 05:10 PM |
Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |