A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GUMPS/Instrument approaches



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 27th 05, 09:18 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

gatt wrote:
Hey, all. Haven't shot instrument approaches in a complex aircraft yet,
and I'm getting ready to so I'm curious:

When you're doing a practice approach in which you know it's going to be
missed, do you complete/amend/ignore the GUMPS check? I'm guessing yes,
but I'm curious as to what others do. Finishing up my complex endorsement
this afternoon, but haven't done any approaches in that plane yet.


I always do the GUMPS check. I almost always do a touch-and-go out of a practice
approach.
  #2  
Old January 27th 05, 09:19 PM
jsmith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Landing checklist completed prior to arrival at the Final Approach Fix.
Gear, flaps and power setting are FAF configuation items to provide
consistant, stable approaches.

  #3  
Old February 2nd 05, 08:53 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"jsmith" wrote in message
...
Landing checklist completed prior to arrival at the Final Approach Fix.


Very useful! thanks.

Gear, flaps and power setting are FAF configuation items to provide
consistant, stable approaches.


-c


  #4  
Old January 27th 05, 11:04 PM
Scott D.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:15:04 -0800, "gatt"
wrote:


Hey, all. Haven't shot instrument approaches in a complex aircraft yet,
and I'm getting ready to so I'm curious:

When you're doing a practice approach in which you know it's going to be
missed, do you complete/amend/ignore the GUMPS check? I'm guessing yes,
but I'm curious as to what others do. Finishing up my complex endorsement
this afternoon, but haven't done any approaches in that plane yet.

Don't skip anything. The reason why we train is so that you build
muscle memory as well. It comes in handy when the S*$% gets deep and
your mind is having to concentrate so hard, that you want some things
to come "Naturally". If you start making adjustments to how you would
normally do something because you know your are going around, you are
training you mind to that which could potentially cause problems down
the road. Always complete the GUMPS when you normally do it and then
when its time to go around do the 5 C's.


Scott D

To email remove spamcatcher
  #6  
Old January 28th 05, 02:02 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

why would you intentionally have the aircraft configured for an approach
that you are not used to.

In the Bonanza, and in the Arrow, having the aircraft trimmed for level
flight at approach speed, and then extending the gear at the FAF makes for a
nice transition to the 500-600fpm required to capture and maintain the glide
slope on the local ILS.

BT

"gatt" wrote in message
...

Hey, all. Haven't shot instrument approaches in a complex aircraft yet,
and I'm getting ready to so I'm curious:

When you're doing a practice approach in which you know it's going to be
missed, do you complete/amend/ignore the GUMPS check? I'm guessing yes,
but I'm curious as to what others do. Finishing up my complex
endorsement
this afternoon, but haven't done any approaches in that plane yet.

-c




  #7  
Old January 28th 05, 10:47 AM
Bill J
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

But... I teach a "keep your forward speed up" that we seem to always get
. You need to know the plane's very different feel if keeping on glide
slope with gear up. Also multiple GUMPS checks on all approaches make
you check on short final DA+200 ft. for example.

BTIZ wrote:
why would you intentionally have the aircraft configured for an approach
that you are not used to.

In the Bonanza, and in the Arrow, having the aircraft trimmed for level
flight at approach speed, and then extending the gear at the FAF makes for a
nice transition to the 500-600fpm required to capture and maintain the glide
slope on the local ILS.

BT

"gatt" wrote in message
...

Hey, all. Haven't shot instrument approaches in a complex aircraft yet,
and I'm getting ready to so I'm curious:

When you're doing a practice approach in which you know it's going to be
missed, do you complete/amend/ignore the GUMPS check? I'm guessing yes,
but I'm curious as to what others do. Finishing up my complex
endorsement
this afternoon, but haven't done any approaches in that plane yet.

-c






  #8  
Old January 29th 05, 03:36 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bill J" wrote in message
...
But... I teach a "keep your forward speed up" that we seem to always get .
You need to know the plane's very different feel if keeping on glide slope
with gear up. Also multiple GUMPS checks on all approaches make you check
on short final DA+200 ft. for example.


agreed.. and on "most" aircraft... once you've for the gear down.. you can
speed up to max gear extended speed, not gear extension speed..

had that happen to me in a Seneca II, slowed to a nice 110knt approach and
approach control decided that was not fast enough.. so on glide path..
speeding up.. and retracting flaps.. able to leave the flap lever at 1
notch, 160knt speed.. and left the gear down.. 150knt speed..

nice exercise to change configuration and drag while still tracking the
loc/glideslope

BT



  #9  
Old January 28th 05, 06:48 PM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


The most important thing for your CFII to teach you on an instrument
approach is how to find the power/prop settings that result in your
approach being at the exact speed you plan for (we plan 90kt in the
Mooney as well as a configuration for 130kts when necessary). All these
power settings would be out the window if you flew with the gear up. I
usually have the student put the gear down at the point of the initial
let down on a non-pre approach and on GS intercept on a pre approach.

-Robert, CFI



gatt wrote:
Hey, all. Haven't shot instrument approaches in a complex aircraft

yet,
and I'm getting ready to so I'm curious:

When you're doing a practice approach in which you know it's going to

be
missed, do you complete/amend/ignore the GUMPS check? I'm guessing

yes,
but I'm curious as to what others do. Finishing up my complex

endorsement
this afternoon, but haven't done any approaches in that plane yet.


  #10  
Old January 28th 05, 09:25 PM
Bill J
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You can't fly 130 knots with gear down in an Arrow

Robert M. Gary wrote:

The most important thing for your CFII to teach you on an instrument
approach is how to find the power/prop settings that result in your
approach being at the exact speed you plan for (we plan 90kt in the
Mooney as well as a configuration for 130kts when necessary). All these
power settings would be out the window if you flew with the gear up. I
usually have the student put the gear down at the point of the initial
let down on a non-pre approach and on GS intercept on a pre approach.

-Robert, CFI



gatt wrote:

Hey, all. Haven't shot instrument approaches in a complex aircraft


yet,

and I'm getting ready to so I'm curious:

When you're doing a practice approach in which you know it's going to


be

missed, do you complete/amend/ignore the GUMPS check? I'm guessing


yes,

but I'm curious as to what others do. Finishing up my complex


endorsement

this afternoon, but haven't done any approaches in that plane yet.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPS/WAAS VNAV approaches and runway length Nathan Young Instrument Flight Rules 8 October 25th 04 06:16 PM
What approaches are in a database? Ross Instrument Flight Rules 11 January 4th 04 07:57 PM
Logging instrument approaches Slav Inger Instrument Flight Rules 33 July 27th 03 11:00 PM
Suppose We Really Do Have Only GPS Approaches Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 10 July 20th 03 05:10 PM
Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 24 July 18th 03 01:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.