![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:53:03 +0000, 10Squared wrote in :: Laser device in question has a rated power of 5 mW. Actually, some are available with over 10 times that power: http://www.wickedlasers.com/products.php However, as you assert, they are probably still incapable of inflicting retinal damage at the distances involved when aimed at an aircraft in flight. OK, let's see what happens with their most wicked laser. I see the Extreme Phoenix with a power rating of 500mW. The quoted beam divergence is 1.2 mrad. Assuming a distance of 1 km, a = 1.2 mrad tan a = x / 1 * 10^3 x = 10^3 * m * x tan a tan a =~ a x = 1.2 * 10^3 * 10^-3 * m = 1.2 meters To be conservative, let's use the beam divergence of only .5 mrad, or .5 meters at 1 km: ..5 m = 50 cm p = 500 mW / (3.141 * 25 * 25 * cm^2) Your 500 mW laser has a power of about .25 mW/cm^2 at 1 km. Again, much less than the MPE for constant exposure. That brings up another point: Who is going to stare at a laser? Brief exposure is uncomfortable and will cause you to look away quickly, so MPE equation #2 is probably the one that applies. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Sport Pilot inconsistency | frustrated flier | Piloting | 19 | September 10th 04 04:53 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Piloting | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |