![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote in message
I hate repeating myself, but I simply cannot imagine a likely scenario where two Mode C equipped aircraft fly close enough together to be a collision threat and one is interrogated while the other is not. Have you flown yet with the ATD300? The altitude and range vary wildly, and I do mean all over the place. It would display 5 miles to 2 miles then 4 miles then 0 miles while the altitude would bounce between 4 or 5 different levels some as many as 10,000 feet in difference all within a couple of seconds. I would see this kind of completely erratic display almost the entire time. For brief period it would show a voltage readout, then back to a wild display of traffic. I don't see how any aircraft can go from 0 miles to 4 miles or 25,000 to 800 in 1.5 seconds. The ATD300 is small in size, but I have no confidence in what it tells me. The 200 performed way better performance wise, but that one had no altitude. I think the 300 is a good voltage meter, but as for traffic, no way. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Plane with no stall warning device? | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 23 | February 17th 04 03:23 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Riddle me this, pilots | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 137 | August 30th 03 04:02 AM |
Riddle me this, pilots | Chip Jones | Piloting | 131 | August 30th 03 04:02 AM |