![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Lynch" wrote
That cite works for a student pilot. A certificated airplane pilot getting glider training is not a student pilot. Correct, and precisely my point. As another poster noted, a CFI gives authorizations and may limit them as he or she sees fit. Operate outside that authorization and you violate Part 61 and possible Part 91. Really? Exactly what part of Part 61 or 91 will you be violating if you are not a student pilot? Chapter and verse please. Michael |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When an instructor endorses a logbook with a limitation and the student
violates that limitation then the specific section of Part 61 that the endorsement contained is reg broken. As for Part 91, that depends on what the pilot (student or transition) did. 91.3 addresses the PIC responsibilities (which a solo pilot, student or transition, is by definition). 91.13 is for careless or reckless operation. Once again, it depends on the circumstances and how much the feds want to write up. "Michael" wrote in message om... "Paul Lynch" wrote That cite works for a student pilot. A certificated airplane pilot getting glider training is not a student pilot. Correct, and precisely my point. As another poster noted, a CFI gives authorizations and may limit them as he or she sees fit. Operate outside that authorization and you violate Part 61 and possible Part 91. Really? Exactly what part of Part 61 or 91 will you be violating if you are not a student pilot? Chapter and verse please. Michael |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is one case where logic does apply to the regulations.
The CFI has given a limited authorization (NOT CERTIFICATE). If the transiztion pilot operates outside the limits of the authorization he/she has no authorization. The CFI did not authorize that and is not accountable. At 19:12 21 August 2003, Judy Ruprecht wrote: At 23:42 20 August 2003, Michael wrote, quoting Paul Lynch: (without a CFI-imposed limitation over & above FAR minimum requirements)... the transition pilot (could) be flying on the CFIs certificate indefinitely. I know what you mean, but I'm the only one who'll be operating 'ON' my CFI certificate, thank you very much - particularly when it's in my back pocket. (to which 'Micael' responded) And on what basis is the transition pilot required to comply with the limitation on the solo endorsement? Chapter and verse, please. Opinion only, since I know of no FAR directly on point here. Still... ... under 61.31(d)(2), such an endorsement can be construed as the CFI defining the 'supervision' he or she will provide. (No supervision, no solo privileges.) ... under 91.103, required preflight action, the PIC is required to 'become familiar with all available information concerning that flight.' Logically (and legally, one hopes) written CFI-imposed limitations regarding x-winds, practice area, x-c routes and/or time limitations would be considered pertinent. ... (hang on - this is sort of an indirect proof) 61.195(d)(iii) prohibits a CFI from endorsing a student pilot certificate or logbook for solo flight unless the CFI has 'determined that the student pilot is prepared to conduct the flight safely under known circumstances, subject to any limitations listed in the student's logbook that the instructor considers necessary for the safety of the flight.' Nothing in this section or elsewhere in the FARs prohibits the CFI from applying the same professional standards to a transition pilot who is not the holder of a student pilot certificate. Judy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The last, and stickyest part about a transitioning pilot is the flight review requirement. Does a pilot transitioning from gliders to power (or vice versa) need a current flight review to fly solo in the new category? Kind of awkward to require a customer to go get a flight review in a different cat and class (which he's rated) before you can solo him. This doesn't make common sense, but if you don't believe he's a student pilot then he needs a flight review to fly solo/PIC, since 61.56(g) does not exempt him from the requirement. But hmmm...I don't see any requirement that a pilot fly in an aircraft in which rated in the Wings program rules... http://www.dayafss.jccbi.gov/ac61-91.htm So perhaps one can do a flight review this way... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This one is interesting. I'd require him to get it
because he is a licensed pilot, and I'm not soloing him as a student. I believe this to be more like a checkout, whereas a BFR is much broader in scope. At 22:54 21 August 2003, Mark James Boyd wrote: The last, and stickyest part about a transitioning pilot is the flight review requirement. Does a pilot transitioning from gliders to power (or vice versa) need a current flight review to fly solo in the new category? Kind of awkward to require a customer to go get a flight review in a different cat and class (which he's rated) before you can solo him. This doesn't make common sense, but if you don't believe he's a student pilot then he needs a flight review to fly solo/PIC, since 61.56(g) does not exempt him from the requirement. But hmmm...I don't see any requirement that a pilot fly in an aircraft in which rated in the Wings program rules... http://www.dayafss.jccbi.gov/ac61-91.htm So perhaps one can do a flight review this way... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 13:42 22 August 2003, Todd Pattist wrote in response
to Mark James Boyd: Does a pilot transitioning from gliders to power (or vice versa) need a current flight review to fly solo in the new category? I think he does. (Otherwise), he could always voluntarily surrender his SEL under 61.27, obtain a student certificate and be treated as a student. This may be one way of dealing with 61.56(c), but here's what FAA's Part 61 FAQ has to say on the topic: QUESTION: The scenario is a rated pilot who is training for a new rating and is flying as a solo “PIC” with appropriate endorsements. In accordance with § 61.56(g), would this rated pilot still be required a current flight review, even to solo the glider while under instruction? ANSWER: Ref. § 61.31(d)(3); No, the pilot would not need to have a current Flight Review to solo as PIC a glider while undergoing training for that rating in a glider, provided that pilot has received the appropriate training and has a current solo endorsement in a glider, as per § 61.31(d)(3). § 61.31(d)(3) was specifically written to address this situation. The complete FAQ is available online at http://www1.faa.gov/AVR/AFS/AFS800/DOCS/pt61FAQ.doc Judy |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|