![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just curious - anyone ever heard of a US glider with a TCAD (such as Ryan's
8800 Gold) installed? Love to get a "user's report" if so . . . Jim Kellett, Resident Curmudgeon Chief Flight Instructor, Skyline Soaring Club Captain and CFI(G), Civil Air Patrol Chairman, Classic Division, Vintage Sailplane Association Webmaster, Open Cirrus Website "If Flying Were the Language of Man, Soaring Would be its Poetry" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have not seen one.. but I would think the battery drain would be
tremendous.. it's hard enough getting them into light twin engine aircraft.. News bulletin: Glider pilot installs mega$$ TCAS system, into $8000 SGS 1-26.. ![]() BT "Jim Kellett" wrote in message t... Just curious - anyone ever heard of a US glider with a TCAD (such as Ryan's 8800 Gold) installed? Love to get a "user's report" if so . . . Jim Kellett, Resident Curmudgeon Chief Flight Instructor, Skyline Soaring Club Captain and CFI(G), Civil Air Patrol Chairman, Classic Division, Vintage Sailplane Association Webmaster, Open Cirrus Website "If Flying Were the Language of Man, Soaring Would be its Poetry" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The most recent AARP magazine had an article about Curmudgeons. Very
interesting reading. The gist is that a Curmudgeon truly worth the name would have none of that "high tech" foolishness! In truth, it would sure be nice to haver, if and when a practical one is available! -- Hartley Falbaum "Jim Kellett" wrote in message t... Just curious - anyone ever heard of a US glider with a TCAD (such as Ryan's 8800 Gold) installed? Love to get a "user's report" if so . . . Jim Kellett, Resident Curmudgeon Chief Flight Instructor, Skyline Soaring Club Captain and CFI(G), Civil Air Patrol Chairman, Classic Division, Vintage Sailplane Association Webmaster, Open Cirrus Website "If Flying Were the Language of Man, Soaring Would be its Poetry" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Kellett" wrote in message et...
Just curious - anyone ever heard of a US glider with a TCAD (such as Ryan's 8800 Gold) installed? Love to get a "user's report" if so . . . Jim Kellett, Resident Curmudgeon Chief Flight Instructor, Skyline Soaring Club Captain and CFI(G), Civil Air Patrol Chairman, Classic Division, Vintage Sailplane Association Webmaster, Open Cirrus Website "If Flying Were the Language of Man, Soaring Would be its Poetry" Heard on an un-named center freq: CTR: "Lear 123, traffic 1 o'clock 3mi, opposite direction, a Piper". Lear123: "yeah center, we got him on the discovery channel" CTR: "Piper 456 do you have the lear"? Piper 456: "Naw, we don't get the discovery channel". CTR: "Piper 456, contact your local cable provider". -Dan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BTIZ" wrote in message news:fu%jb.49054$La.18760@fed1read02... I have not seen one.. but I would think the battery drain would be tremendous.. it's hard enough getting them into light twin engine aircraft.. Not TCAS, TCAD. Like TPAS, it's passive, so there's no big power drain for a transmitter . . some of the low end TPAS units run on AA cells, independent of the airplane's power supply . . . (These units depend on the target's transponder responding to some OTHER radar interrogation . . ) That's what made me think SOMEONE om a g;oder out there might be trying one of the TCAD units, which apparently has a little better logic circuit in it that TPAS. . . . Jim K |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... Not TCAS, TCAD. Like TPAS, it's passive, so there's no big power drain for a transmitter . . some of the low end TPAS units run on AA cells, independent of the airplane's power supply . . . (These units depend on the target's transponder responding to some OTHER radar interrogation . . ) That's what made me think SOMEONE om a g;oder out there might be trying one of the TCAD units, which apparently has a little better logic circuit in it that TPAS. . . . Are you talking about the Ryan TCAD system? It's quite large, power hungry (1.2 amps), and expensive ($10,000) for a glider, I think. See http://www.ryan-tcad.com/products/traffic_9900B.html It's the only TCAD system I'm aware of. -- !Replace DECIMAL.POINT in my e-mail address with just a . to reply directly Eric Greenwell Richland, WA (USA) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message http://www.ryan-tcad.com/products/traffic_9900B.html It's the only TCAD system I'm aware of. Eric ('n all), There's also "Skywatch", I think by BF Goodrich. Same problem though, expensive and consumes too much power for a glider. What would be *really* good is if they came out with a portable ADS-B for cheap! But since that won't happen soon - or ever, the only game left I'm aware of is passive transponder detectors . . . and these have gotten mixed reviews until just recently. The following is cut from a post on the Mooney tech group: "Just got my TrafficScope TPAS VRX from Surecheck last week and had a chance to fly with it. Absolutely a first-rate product!!! Much, much better/different than the earlier TPAS RX-110 version. http://www.surecheck.net . . ." The problem with previous passive detectors is they were based on signal strength only, no bearing or altitude info. That, and some users experienced a lot of falses. The new version mentioned above still doesn't give bearing, but it *does* give altitude of the target and since it decodes this info, can eliminate much of the falsing, alerts from overhead airliners etc. I have no connection with the above company and don't have one of these things to play with - yet. At $1200 . . . figured I'd wait some until there are more happy customers. -- bumper - ZZ "Dare to be different . . . circle in sink." to reply, the last half is right to left --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 10/9/2003 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
At 13.8v the ProXalert R5 device needs only ONE watt compared to nearly 5 watts for the Trafficscope(c). It displays up to three threats including squawk, altitude and distance. It also features a built in altitude alerter. It will be available mid November. See our Website www.proxalert.com Have safe flight, Regards, "John Morgan" wrote in message ... "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message http://www.ryan-tcad.com/products/traffic_9900B.html It's the only TCAD system I'm aware of. Eric ('n all), There's also "Skywatch", I think by BF Goodrich. Same problem though, expensive and consumes too much power for a glider. What would be *really* good is if they came out with a portable ADS-B for cheap! But since that won't happen soon - or ever, the only game left I'm aware of is passive transponder detectors . . . and these have gotten mixed reviews until just recently. The following is cut from a post on the Mooney tech group: "Just got my TrafficScope TPAS VRX from Surecheck last week and had a chance to fly with it. Absolutely a first-rate product!!! Much, much better/different than the earlier TPAS RX-110 version. http://www.surecheck.net . . ." The problem with previous passive detectors is they were based on signal strength only, no bearing or altitude info. That, and some users experienced a lot of falses. The new version mentioned above still doesn't give bearing, but it *does* give altitude of the target and since it decodes this info, can eliminate much of the falsing, alerts from overhead airliners etc. I have no connection with the above company and don't have one of these things to play with - yet. At $1200 . . . figured I'd wait some until there are more happy customers. -- bumper - ZZ "Dare to be different . . . circle in sink." to reply, the last half is right to left --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 10/9/2003 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 04:17:53 GMT, "John Morgan"
wrote: What would be *really* good is if they came out with a portable ADS-B for cheap! But since that won't happen soon - or ever, the only game left I'm aware of is passive transponder detectors . . . ADS -B is currently being trialled just north of me around Bundaberg. There are plans afoot in Australia to fit the entire fleet as our radar sensors are due for retirement or replacement in 2008. It seems that fitting the entire civil fleet with ADS-B for free or heavily subsidised is cheaper than replacing the radar sensors. We currently have in operation the placement of 20 ADS-B ground stations so we get radar like coverage over the whole continent above 20000 feet. Radars require too much power and maintenance in remote locations. Most of Aus is pretty empty, it isn't called GAFA for nothing. Mike Borgelt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gliders and motorgliders | Mike Borgelt | Soaring | 0 | September 22nd 03 10:57 PM |
Motorgliders and gliders in US... | M B | Soaring | 1 | September 22nd 03 10:33 PM |
Avoiding gliders | Stefan | Piloting | 16 | August 6th 03 05:44 AM |
Anti-collision system for gliders | Karl Osen | Soaring | 10 | July 21st 03 06:06 PM |