![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jack wrote:
"What's your point: that the civilian contractors are a bunch of loose cannons -- or that the USAFA simply hasn't figured out how to manage the program?" Hardly. The intent was to inform that the maintenance is not performed by the military. Perhaps it should be. But I can say I have never seen any better maintained aircraft throughout either my military or airline tenure. I can state that the paperwork B.S. has been exponentially much greater throughout my civilian flying career. USAFA not properly managing the program? As with any large scale endeavor of such a large organization fraught with overmanagement and a multilevel bureacracy, the USAFA soaring program has had its moments of inefficiency. But all in all, no soaring program in the world has soloed greater numbers in the last twenty years--about one thousand per year--plus training dozens of instructors per year, plus aerobatics, wave, and cross-country. "...it looks very bad that the most advanced and powerful Air Force in the world cannot handle a few dozen gliders in a non-essential program that it also refuses to drop." I'll address the latter part of your statement first. You say "non-essential". I say inextricably associated with the mission of the Academy. Annapolis teaches its Midshipmen to sail. West Point lets their Cadets drive tanks. What would you have the "Air" Force Academy do to relate its mission to those who attend that military institution? I truly find it hard to believe that anyone who has an interest in soaring (since you obviously frequent this forum) genuinely supports ceasing the world's largest soaring operation that exposes thousands of participants to the sport each year. "...refuses to drop." Not the Air Force's call--something related to the concept of civilian control of the military. The USAFA soaring program is mandated by the Academy's congressional oversight committee. This committee decreed in the early eighties that every sophomore Cadet would be exposed to flying (even if that Cadet was to be assigned a non-flying job upon graduation) by being given the opportunity to solo a glider. If anyone really wants the program to go away I suggest writing to one's congressman. "A great motivator is it? How motivational is it" Another interesting question/comment coming from someone who I assume has a mutual interest in soaring. Although most probably a very individual question, I pesonally don't recall ever seeing a single Cadet who wasn't thrilled with the prospect to get away from the intensity of their otherwise overcontrolled and overscheduled life for a chance to fly in a glider. I just had a young friend of the family graduate from USAFA and is now in jet flight training, and all he could talk about for four years was how excited he was to be involved in the soaring program. Who with an interest in aviation would consider such an opportunity to not be motivational? My soaring club has as members two USAFA grads/ex-cadet soaring instructors who swear they would not have stuck it out at the Academy if it weren't for the soaring program. I read in almost every issue of "Soaring" magazine where some young person just having soloed and has the goal to fly gliders at the Air Force Academy. Yes, I think it damn important to have flying oriented programs offered at the "Air" Force Academy. Non-motivational with the program's recent history of on again, off again? Disaapointing--yes, non-motivational--hardly. Would it be more motivational if the program was outright canned? I think not. Kinda the same perverse mentality as the old addage "All leaves are cancelled until morale improves". Can the Academy do a better job of managing the program? Sure. But in this case the best course of action is not to fly until the paperwork is in order. Let's not overreact and cut off the foot to spite the toe. "Yes, indeed, a real bunch of warriors, those Air Force Academy graduates" I don't see where this sort of comment is condusive to a discussion on a Soaring forum about the Academy's soaring program. I can cite many names and many instances of U.S. Air Force Academy graduates who have distinguished themselves in combat situations, and many, many more who have honorable served their country, some to the degree of the ultimate sacrifice. I'm sure these true warriors and their families don't at all appreciate that you infer otherwise. RD |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fleet Air Arm Carriers and Squadrons in the Korean War | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 5th 04 03:58 AM |
| Air Force Releases USAFA Report U.S. Air Force lists at | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 7th 04 10:27 PM |
| TU-22M3 BACKFIRE Crash - Fleet grounded pending investigation | TJ | Military Aviation | 0 | July 10th 04 10:43 PM |
| USAFA Flight Program Interrupted, Again...and Again...and Again | Jack | Military Aviation | 0 | January 15th 04 10:19 AM |
| Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 04:09 AM |