![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
One more thought about Mid Air Collisions.
Next time you are belting along under a cloud street at 90 - 100 Knots plus. How far away will the other glider be, doing the same thing in the opposite direction, when you see it, and how long have you got to make the right decision with a closing speed of 200 knots!!!!!!! At 09:54 16 April 2004, Tom Rent wrote: I'm sure almost every RAS reader has read every word of Paul's account because we all have been in the same situation numerous times and could see the same thing happen to us at any moment. I have a lot of soaring books but it is interesting that little is written or formally taught about this aspect of soaring. Outside of the basic rule of gaggle flying in the same direction as others, I think we need a stamdard protocol for any proximity or formation flying which we all rouinely do. Outside of stall/spin in the pattern, mid-airs during proximit/formation flying (including gaggles) is likely the next most dangerous situation we activily place ourselves in. 1. What is the safest way to enter a gaggle, and what are the most unsafe ways? 2. If you lose sight of another glider that you are gaggling with, should you keep thermalling or head away? (assume no radio available) 3. What is the safest way to exit a gaggle, and what are the most unsafe ways? 4. Pair flying - best practices and worst practices ....? Let's express our best ideas here and perhaps this too will save lives. I do know that these recent events have caused members of our local club to immediately begin studying our local methods and habits, which I think this activity will result in some pretty healthy positive changes. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
There's a lot that can be written about gaggle flying, (And I hope will be.)
but I'd like to cut to a small part of it. Thermaling with one other glider. If the other pilot is highly skilled, this can be a very beautiful experience. Two pilots who really know the techniques will position themselves on opposite sides of the circle from each other while flying at the same bank angle and airspeed while maintaining the same center. The other glider will seem to hang motionless in mid-air 300 feet away as the world whirls about. Eye contact is maintained between the two pilots. It always surprises me when I hear objections to this like, "it's dangerous to be that close to another glider, it scares me". In fact, this is the safest configuration to be thermaling with another glider. There's just no way that a collision can occur if this formation is maintained. Each glider is on a reciprocal heading and separated by 300 feet or more. Either glider can roll out and fly away at any time and the separation will increase. In addition, the other glider is a far better indication of lift than any vario. If he climbs in relation to you, then the circle needs to be moved that direction. To make that move and maintain the relative position of the gliders, he will not make a correction, that is up to you. He knows that you saw him climb and that you will move the circle towards the lift, he will follow. Roll out on a heading towards where you saw him climb, fly for three seconds and roll back in and he will do the same and the formation is maintained even as it is shifted toward the stronger lift. If you are the one that hits a strong core, wait for the other pilot to make a move, then follow. All to often, I see the other glider roll out when he hits the core of the thermal. This is a really dumb move since he in now flying directly away from the best lift. Now, if I want to maintain the formation, I will have to fly out of the thermal with him. Or, timid pilots will simply move away one circle diameter and try to work the broken lift there. Now you meet him head-on once every turn while losing sight of him in between - this IS dangerous. I recently saw four gliders at the same altitude flying a "four leaf clover" pattern. They all met at intersecting angles each turn. I didn't enter that gaggle. So, the point of the above ramble is that not only should you turn in the same direction as the other glider, also turn about the same center point. Bill Daniels "Trevor Nash" wrote in message ... One more thought about Mid Air Collisions. Next time you are belting along under a cloud street at 90 - 100 Knots plus. How far away will the other glider be, doing the same thing in the opposite direction, when you see it, and how long have you got to make the right decision with a closing speed of 200 knots!!!!!!! At 09:54 16 April 2004, Tom Rent wrote: I'm sure almost every RAS reader has read every word of Paul's account because we all have been in the same situation numerous times and could see the same thing happen to us at any moment. I have a lot of soaring books but it is interesting that little is written or formally taught about this aspect of soaring. Outside of the basic rule of gaggle flying in the same direction as others, I think we need a stamdard protocol for any proximity or formation flying which we all rouinely do. Outside of stall/spin in the pattern, mid-airs during proximit/formation flying (including gaggles) is likely the next most dangerous situation we activily place ourselves in. 1. What is the safest way to enter a gaggle, and what are the most unsafe ways? 2. If you lose sight of another glider that you are gaggling with, should you keep thermalling or head away? (assume no radio available) 3. What is the safest way to exit a gaggle, and what are the most unsafe ways? 4. Pair flying - best practices and worst practices ....? Let's express our best ideas here and perhaps this too will save lives. I do know that these recent events have caused members of our local club to immediately begin studying our local methods and habits, which I think this activity will result in some pretty healthy positive changes. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Trevor Nash wrote:
One more thought about Mid Air Collisions. Next time you are belting along under a cloud street at 90 - 100 Knots plus. How far away will the other glider be, doing the same thing in the opposite direction, when you see it, and how long have you got to make the right decision with a closing speed of 200 knots!!!!!!! I t looked like about a quarter mile. But we were each only doing 80-85kts. Maybe 100 yds closest approach. Something to keep in mid while flying in mountains (this was just north of Salida, CO), white gliders with clouds, mountains, and snow behind them are really wearing camouflage. Shawn Been there done that. Not my idea of fun. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I see that Europeons use a lot of anti-collision markings on
their sailplanes. I don't know if it's a requirement over there but it seems like a good idea. Is there a reason why U.S. glider owners resist this trend. Thanks, __Mike Ziaskas |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In some recent testing by the BGA it appears that, if anything, anti
collision marking may actually make aircraft less easily noticable. Most of the midairs that we have seen recently have been between sailplanes that knew there was another aircraft in close proximity before the collision happened and in several cases have been between sailplanes actively involved in 'cooperative flying'. When two 'non-cooperative' pilots happen to end up sharing a thermal they tend to do so with a very high degree of caution about each others actions. When cooperative flying gets going it appears to me that a degree of familiarity or complacency creeps in. It appears to me that the guidance emerging here seems to be 'assume nothing, if you loose sight of the aircraft you know to be close by, talk quickly to clarify the sitation whilst increasing your seperation safely'. Perhaps safe cooperative flying does need a much higher level of communication. Perhaps pilots flying cooperatively should carrry FRS radios to allow them to chatter continuously. As one poster has already noted, cooperative flying is a form of advanced formation flying with continuous formation breaks and reformates and without much of a plan. In that situation you have to know what you are up to, what the other pilot is doing and the actions to take when the script gets lost! I remember a talk given by a member of a top formation aerobatics display team in which he said that once an aircraft in the formation was not where it was expected to be, when it was supposed to be there, the only option was to break away and resync the whole operation. I have witnessed 2 mid-airs, thankfully with only one fatality amongst my fellow pilots. Both were in non-cooperative flying. Both could possibly have been avoided by better observation. Ian |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Distance Task Opinions? | Kilo Charlie | Soaring | 14 | September 6th 03 05:23 AM |