![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stewart Kissel" wrote in message ... If one FSDO accepts this addendum...would others have too? One of the frustrations of the current process for us...is differnet interpretations of the memo from different offices. Is anyone aware of someone who has tried this route yet? The whole reason to do an stc is to gain the stamp of approval that is recognised by all fsdo's. An stc is accepted across fsdo boundarys. A 337 attempt on the other hand is a local approval and has no national standards for acceptability. The local area sets it's own rules up and thats that. The differences between a moderately complex 337 and an stc is timing. The mido guys have a backlog and schedule to work with while the fsdo office is a bit more flexible . |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As part of my ongoing quest to understand and resolve
this....the AI told me today that the memo was generated not only by the air-tankers shedding wings... But that the FAA is being sued by the widow of a towpilot killed in a glider-pullover accident, and a Pawnee was involved. I had not heard of this...but was there not lawyers trolling for towplane information here or elsewhere? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
they were trolling here.. I remember that..
BT "Stewart Kissel" wrote in message ... As part of my ongoing quest to understand and resolve this....the AI told me today that the memo was generated not only by the air-tankers shedding wings... But that the FAA is being sued by the widow of a towpilot killed in a glider-pullover accident, and a Pawnee was involved. I had not heard of this...but was there not lawyers trolling for towplane information here or elsewhere? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
An update-
If your Pawnee is in restricted category...the FAA can make life tough even if towing is on the certificate. Email if u desire the gory details. My suggestion is go to them first with what you have in mind if you are looking at a 337. I have not heard back from Northcraft or Ruprecht in regards to the SSA petition on Pawnees...so am proceeding on my own with some very valuable help from Roy Bourgeios. At 05:12 16 October 2004, Btiz wrote: they were trolling here.. I remember that.. BT 'Stewart Kissel' wrote in message ... As part of my ongoing quest to understand and resolve this....the AI told me today that the memo was generated not only by the air-tankers shedding wings... But that the FAA is being sued by the widow of a towpilot killed in a glider-pullover accident, and a Pawnee was involved. I had not heard of this...but was there not lawyers trolling for towplane information here or elsewhere? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Update #2-
The FAA crackdown on approving Restricted-Ag aircraft for other uses is going to create problems for those who operate Restricted Pawnees if: 1.) They do not have 'Glider Towing' on the certificate as an approved activity...this is regardless of whether the aircraft has been towing. 2.) If the aircraft has 'Glider Towing' on the certificate...but has never towed...the FAA will likewise not approve towing. Don't even think of buying a Restricted Pawnee unless you do your homework first....conversions back to Standard-Normal are not particularly certain. As far a getting 337's approved for things like switching from Schweitzer to Tost...I imaginge that will get messy too. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stewart Kissel" wrote in message ... SNIP 1.) They do not have 'Glider Towing' on the certificate as an approved activity...this is regardless of whether the aircraft has been towing. SNIP We have a Pawnee that is in the restricted category and is approved on the airworthiness certificate for glider towing and for banner towing. It has been towing gliders for many years. The local FSDO says that the approval for towing (done in a different region) was done in error but that they will not shut down our towing operation (at this time?) because of it. Changing to normal category can be a can of worms. The first problem is finding an original manual, which is no longer available. We are also scared of not changing to normal category, for fear of being surprised later. What to do? Another example of our tax dollars at work... -Bob Korves |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I found the source of original manuals...with the new
owner of the type certificate in Argentina. Send me an email and I will forward the information to you. At 03:12 27 October 2004, Bob Korves wrote: 'Stewart Kissel' wrote in message ... SNIP 1.) They do not have 'Glider Towing' on the certificate as an approved activity...this is regardless of whether the aircraft has been towing. SNIP We have a Pawnee that is in the restricted category and is approved on the airworthiness certificate for glider towing and for banner towing. It has been towing gliders for many years. The local FSDO says that the approval for towing (done in a different region) was done in error but that they will not shut down our towing operation (at this time?) because of it. Changing to normal category can be a can of worms. The first problem is finding an original manual, which is no longer available. We are also scared of not changing to normal category, for fear of being surprised later. What to do? Another example of our tax dollars at work... -Bob Korves |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The local FSDO
says that the approval for towing (done in a different region) was done in error but that they will not shut down our towing operation (at this time?) As best I can tell, FSDO's are not reading the 9/22/03 document...it states that restricted aircraft that have an approved activity not in agriculture on the certificate, and have done that activity, may continue. (ie Glider towing) Which might lead some to ask...what is the point of all this? Since it will not stop existing aircraft from continuing. Perhaps if our Washington long-winger from the dark-side is lurking, he may shed some light on this. ![]() At 03:18 27 October 2004, Stewart Kissel wrote: I found the source of original manuals...with the new owner of the type certificate in Argentina. Send me an email and I will forward the information to you. At 03:12 27 October 2004, Bob Korves wrote: 'Stewart Kissel' wrote in message ... SNIP 1.) They do not have 'Glider Towing' on the certificate as an approved activity...this is regardless of whether the aircraft has been towing. SNIP We have a Pawnee that is in the restricted category and is approved on the airworthiness certificate for glider towing and for banner towing. It has been towing gliders for many years. The local FSDO says that the approval for towing (done in a different region) was done in error but that they will not shut down our towing operation (at this time?) because of it. Changing to normal category can be a can of worms. The first problem is finding an original manual, which is no longer available. We are also scared of not changing to normal category, for fear of being surprised later. What to do? Another example of our tax dollars at work... -Bob Korves |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MARKET GARDEN ALL OVER AGAIN? WHAT THE HELL? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 8 | February 8th 04 09:37 AM |
Soaring Hell - Arizona | Michael Stringfellow | Soaring | 6 | January 20th 04 03:57 PM |
Pawnee service manuals needed | Ray0126 | Soaring | 1 | December 11th 03 09:12 PM |
Pawnee t/o performance-towing | Kurt | Soaring | 2 | September 24th 03 08:39 AM |
FS Pawnee tugs | Robert Danewid | Soaring | 0 | August 9th 03 09:51 AM |