![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Udo,
Yes, the Zuni has a vent line running from the outboard end of the tank, back through the tank, and exiting the bottom side of the wing, near the leading edge, ahead of the dump hole. This is not exactly as you had asked about, but very similar. It does provide good venting of the tank. It does have a drawback in that if the tanks are full and the plane is slightly wing low (sitting with the wing wheel on, for example), water will tend to siphon from the low wing out the vent hole. This vent is about 5/16th diameter on my Zuni. Also, the HP-18 built by my father, Robert Leonard, and now owned by my brother, Ron Leonard, has a vent tube running the length of the wing. It also exits the underside of the wing, but near the trailing edge, just outboard of the root rib. I believe this vent tube is 1/2 inch tygon tubing. His dump system comes out of the stock Schreder dump port on the front face of the spar, goes through a 90 degree elbow to go outboard, through a dump valve, and exits through the bottom of the wing, one or two foam ribs outboard of the root rib. The intent of this system was to keep the water plumbing all in/on the wing. That way, there would be no leaks into the fuselage. When building this HP-18, he had considered adding an extra ballast box in the first bay ahead of the spar. His plan was to put an isolation valve on this tank so he could either fly with half water (fill the spar only) or full water (by openning the valve and filling both tanks). He decided against this, and just stuck with the stock water capacity. Is this similar to what you are planning to do, but with one tank ahead of and one behind the spar? But, yes. Vents back to the root do work. Oh, yes. You can set a wing down and not worry about loosing your water! But you will fill the vent lines and then drain at least part of that water overboard when you level the wings for takeoff. If you do tie all vents to a common manifold, you wil probably not be able to be assured that you will not get some water into a tank you did not fill. Amount would likely be vent line volume. Maybe a bit more or less, depending on how you fill the system. My suggestioin would be to keep each tank vent seperate. Steve Leonard Zuni II HP-14 Too many others to mention ;-) |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... It does provide good venting of the tank. It does have a drawback in that if the tanks are full and the plane is slightly wing low (sitting with the wing wheel on, for example), water will tend to siphon from the low wing out the vent hole. This vent is about 5/16th diameter on my Zuni. Steve, I should maybe manifold all three lines at the turtle deck that would prevent siphoning. I believe also the 5/16" vent tube will be enough, as each tank is relatively small and all will have a separate dumb valve. The centre tank is 2 x 8 gal. front 2x 6 and the back 2x5gal. one or two foam ribs outboard of the root rib. The intent of this system was to keep the water plumbing all in/on the wing. That way, there would be no leaks into the fuselage. Is this similar to what you are planning to do, but with one tank ahead of and one behind the spar? I was planning on placing the valves in the front and back tank and stay with a standard 2 ball valve set-up for the spar tank. Tank you Udo |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Udo Rumpf wrote:
Steve, I should maybe manifold all three lines at the turtle deck that would prevent siphoning. Now that I think about it a bit more, it is not so much siphoning, as simply draining. With the wing low enough that the water is up to the level of the vent at the outboard end of the tank, and the exit point of the vent tube from the aircraft is below the water level in the tank, it will simply drain. I suspect there is a point in the vent tube that goes above the water level in the tank when it is sitting with one wing level with the ground. I think if you just keep them above the level of the water in the tank, it should be OK. Manifolded together, or individually. I would make sure it is either outside the airplane or in an area that can drain, as if you tow the ballasted glider around a corner, you will likely push some water into the vents, even if it was level to start with. Steve |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Water Cooled Jet Engines: a possibillity then and now? | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 3 | December 18th 03 10:41 AM |
| ASW27 Wing water tank | Ray Gimmey | Soaring | 0 | November 10th 03 11:35 PM |
| Yo! Fuel Tank! | Veeduber | Home Built | 15 | October 25th 03 03:57 AM |
| Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | September 29th 03 04:40 PM |
| #1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 04:04 AM |