![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Cessna's have more utility. Many Cessna models are/were available with
factory seaplane kits. The 150, 170, 172, 180, 182, 185, 190, 195, &206 were all offered as factory seaplanes. How many aluminum Pipers are seaplanes? Answer, ZERO. Although there was "one" Cherokee 180 factory seaplane, I flew it and it was a dog. The landing gear is the weak spot on the Pipers. Used on unimproved strips the struts get pushed through the wing. That's why you see Cessna 206s and 207s in Alaska with 25,000 hrs on them. The 260 and 300 Cherokee "6s" have good load carrying capacity, but they are a pig to fly and to last at all need to be flown off pavement. You will NEVER see a Cherokee with that kind of time as a bush plane. The Cessnas have a better wing for short unimproved strips, and far superior flaps for short field approaches. Cessnas have "Paralift Flaps" big fowler flaps, more expensive to engineer and produce, and worth it. Further, the Cessnas all have better control harmony. Not that they feel good, but much better handling qualities than the Cherokee line. They all fly like trucks, just he Cherokee flys like a Mack truck and the Cessna like a Ford 150. Piper even worked to destroy the control harmony built into the first Warriors. They early Warriors had "Frise" ailerons and had pretty nice roll control, better than a comparable Cessna. But by the 1976(?) model year they were replaced by cheap piano hinge ailerons and the nice feel they had for two years went away. Karl "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:GwZXd.113513$4q6.87063@attbi_s01... I might argue Chevy|Ford vs. Toyota. The Piper is more "normal," and thus has simpler, more available, and I daresay cheaper parts. The Mooney is a better engineered plane (like a Cessna is) Just curious. In your view, how is a Cessna "better engineered" than a Piper? I've flown them both, seen the insides of both, and both brands appear to be almost identical in both performance and design, other than the wing being in the wrong place on Cessnas. And they have both proven, over time, to be extremely durable, classic designs. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
So I invested my US$6°°.....GUESS WHAT!!!... less than ten days later, I received money | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | January 16th 05 06:48 AM |
Ongoing Arrow alternator/charging problem | Chuck | Owning | 6 | December 22nd 04 01:18 AM |
CF-105 AVRO Arrow etc. | Ed Majden | Military Aviation | 4 | February 22nd 04 07:00 PM |
Re; What do you think? | Kelsibutt | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 29th 03 06:55 AM |