![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jcpearce wrote:
So it is coming solely from the motherboard, some chip on the board is oscillating in the 107~130 Mhz range, given this occurs against one That frequency is awful close to the bus frequency of modern systems (133Mhz). If you're using DIMM memory, do you have a card in every slot, or do you have some of those little radiators hanging free? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Evan, I have eyed that book at the local bookstore and given
that you mention there is a section (and paranoid no less, a good thing) on this I'll purchase a copy. Books like this can save a lot of hair being pulled out. The enclosure I made is riveted and there are very small gaps in addition to where the mandrel pulls out leaving a small hole. Would encompassing the whole thing in aluminum foil (as a test, not for deployment) accurately simulate these sophisticated seals? Before going through that effort I would want to know what, if any, gain I may derive. Ernest the MB only has one DDR slot, where a single 512 Mb card is plugged in. I am encouraged that if the power supply issue can be solved via shielding I will be set. The people at ituner admitted the PW-60 DC-DC power supply was a noise daemon but there new super improved model the M1-ATX ( http://www.mini-box.com/s.nl/sc.8/ca...it.A/id.356/.f ) model would solve this and they are sending me a unit, they are willing to work with me which is quite good customer service. If it is still too noisy I'll get paranoid with cases within cases, welding, prayer, etc... If still too noisy (please no) I'll do my own power supply, Thanks for the replies. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() jcpearce wrote: As a pet/learning project I made a data aquisition unit using an 8051 microprocessor and an EPIA M motherboard running a variant of Linux to process and display the information. It all works but the EMI from the EPIA M causes way too much noise to the aircraft radios. I have tried shielding the whole device in an aluminum case with very little improvement. Any ideas on how to smother the EMI or some other small motherboard which may not have as much an issue (as a test I took my portable aviation radio and within 6' of any my home computers the same occurs which gives me little hope) Thanks Hi, JC! As others have mentioned, it is important that the conductors carrying signal and power in and out of the case be prevented from carrying the RFI/EMI out of the box; ferrite beads and high-quality ceramic caps or filter connectors can take care of that problem. Try not to use too high a value of cap as the self-resonant frequency decreases with size. Usually around 100pf is good at VHF. Your circuits have many frquency dividers which reduce the initial oscillator frequency down to much lower values. These square-waves are rich in harmonics. If you tune an FM receiver or a VHF receiver across each band you can recognize the various harmonics by seeing where the amplitude peaks. You can make a list of these and see the periodicity of the responsible waveform. The rf energy inside your box induces currents in the metallic structure of the box. Any gaps, no matter how small, form a slot antenna which radiates. Each fastener around the periphery of the box where the sides and top and bottom attach when tightened cause a slight arch in the surfaces which form the slots. Think of the pan and rocker-arm covers opn a car engine! There are several ways to stop this. Use conductive elastomer gaskets at each joint, make the box out of extremely thick material with machined mating surfaces with joggles, or cover the box with rf absorbent material with an overall metal cover such as aluminum foil. Any rf energy leaking out of the box gaps will be absorbed somewhat as they pass through the absorber, will reradite from the foil back through the material, and then through many passes back and forth be attenuated. One of the manufacturers of rf gaskets has an excellent description of the radiation from a box in their product manual. Paul |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think your idea of putting a noisey mother board inside an aluminum
box for shielding is a reasonable one. The problem may be that the aluminum box your're thinking of as a shield, looks like an antenna to your VHF receiver. You need to make the potential of the shield box be the same as the ground of the receiver. The lower he inductance this connection is, the more alike the grounds will be and the receiver won't be able to notice the potential of the case going up and down at 100MHz. Some other things, make sure the ground of your MOBO is connected with a thick stap to the case. Solving EMI problems is like peeling an onion. Each layer makes you wanna cry. You hit the low order effects first because they have the largest effect and are easiest to fix. Eventually you get to a place of diminishing returns (EMI gaskets, etc) were you can live with the "birds" and squelch them out and live with the loss of sensitivity on some channels of your receiver. Regards jcpearce wrote: As a pet/learning project I made a data aquisition unit using an 8051 microprocessor and an EPIA M motherboard running a variant of Linux to process and display the information. It all works but the EMI from the EPIA M causes way too much noise to the aircraft radios. I have tried shielding the whole device in an aluminum case with very little improvement. Any ideas on how to smother the EMI or some other small motherboard which may not have as much an issue (as a test I took my portable aviation radio and within 6' of any my home computers the same occurs which gives me little hope) Thanks |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Do a Google search on mumetal. Some years ago I had a shielding problem on a Gulfstream and was able to kill it with a mumetal shield. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are experiencing a problem that can be solved easily, using techniques
known by radio amateurs. In particular, The Radio Handbook, bu Bill Orr, has a chart showing the attenuation of signal levels by various bypassing methods used at the case of a shielded piece of equipment. At 100 MHz, the attenuation of a standard bypass capacitor is not very high. Additional filtering will reduce the level to where you cannot hear the noise coming from the microprocessor. There are special capacitors, called feedthrough capacitors, which do a great job of attenuating the signal level, and that combined with a pi-network will result in no signal coming. I would suggest that you borrow a high bandwidth scope (200 to 400 MHz) to look at the levels coming out. Where ultimate attenuation is required, double shielding is often used, however I do not think you need that level of attenuation. Colin N12HS --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.783 / Virus Database: 529 - Release Date: 10/25/04 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() jcpearce wrote: As a pet/learning project I made a data aquisition unit using an 8051 microprocessor and an EPIA M motherboard running a variant of Linux to process and display the information. It all works but the EMI from the EPIA M causes way too much noise to the aircraft radios. I have tried shielding the whole device in an aluminum case with very little improvement. Any ideas on how to smother the EMI or some other small motherboard which may not have as much an issue (as a test I took my portable aviation radio and within 6' of any my home computers the same occurs which gives me little hope) Thanks Hi, JC Here's a couple more ideas on containing signals in the box. First, have plenty of closely spaced fasteners along the joints; not just in the corners. Second, the thin copper desoldering braid makes a fairly good RF gasket. 'Best with your project! Paul |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Here's a couple more ideas on containing signals in the box. First, have
plenty of closely spaced fasteners along the joints; not just in the corners. Second, the thin copper desoldering braid makes a fairly good RF gasket. 'Best with your project!" I would not use desoldering braid. Copper reacts with aluminum. The electrolysis will form aluminum oxide, which is an excellent insulator, and the rf tight enclosure will no longer be secure. It could also cause rectification, and allow external signals to mix, resulting in many spurious signals. Aluminum likes stainless steel, since the electric qualities are similar. Aluminum and copper plus moisture will form a battery. Colin N12HS --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.783 / Virus Database: 529 - Release Date: 10/25/04 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() COLIN LAMB wrote: "Here's a couple more ideas on containing signals in the box. First, have plenty of closely spaced fasteners along the joints; not just in the corners. Second, the thin copper desoldering braid makes a fairly good RF gasket. 'Best with your project!" I would not use desoldering braid. Copper reacts with aluminum. The electrolysis will form aluminum oxide, which is an excellent insulator, and the rf tight enclosure will no longer be secure. It could also cause rectification, and allow external signals to mix, resulting in many spurious signals. Aluminum likes stainless steel, since the electric qualities are similar. Aluminum and copper plus moisture will form a battery. Colin N12HS Hi, Colin! Excellent consideration! Thanks for the heads-up! Paul --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.783 / Virus Database: 529 - Release Date: 10/25/04 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RFI is best squelched at the souce, i.e. on the PC board. The biggest
source of RFI is the clock that drives the processor, etc. If it isn't routed on the board very well or properly terminated, it will radiate like a pig. Also, effective grounding of the PC board to the case is important. Given that you have a noisy PC board, the only way to effectively shield it is the fully enclose it in a conductive case, preferrable made out of steel since that will also block the magnetic portion of the radiation. Any gaps or slots in the case that are as large as the wavelengths of the radiated signals will allow the signals to escape. In an airplane, aluminum cases are preferred due to their light weight and lack of magnetic effects on the compass. Also, wires that run out of the enclosure will often carry the RFI signals and re-radiate them by acting as antennas unless they are also well shielded and properly terminated to the case ground. Ferrite cores can also be effective in blocking such signals from traveling out through the wires. Dean These are all band-aids for the original problem of having an overly noisy PC board. "jcpearce" wrote in message ups.com... As a pet/learning project I made a data aquisition unit using an 8051 microprocessor and an EPIA M motherboard running a variant of Linux to process and display the information. It all works but the EMI from the EPIA M causes way too much noise to the aircraft radios. I have tried shielding the whole device in an aluminum case with very little improvement. Any ideas on how to smother the EMI or some other small motherboard which may not have as much an issue (as a test I took my portable aviation radio and within 6' of any my home computers the same occurs which gives me little hope) Thanks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|