![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
True. The equipment at the controllers' end corrects for barometric
pressure fluctuations, so the info the controller sees is pretty accurate. In our neck of the woods (NZ) they only apply a correction below the transition altitude - no need for any correction for flight levels. Assume it's the same in the states |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Cockpit Colin" wrote in message ... In our neck of the woods (NZ) they only apply a correction below the transition altitude - no need for any correction for flight levels. Assume it's the same in the states It's the same everywhere. It can be no other way. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
It's the same everywhere. It can be no other way. Of course it could. Whether it would make sense is a different question. Stefan |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Stefan" wrote in message ... Of course it could. Whether it would make sense is a different question. How could it be any other way? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
How could it be any other way? Just a few examples: It could be QNH everywhere (requires defined QNH regions). It could be GPS altitude (would even simplify things a lot, but requires all aircraft to be expensively equipped). Heck, it could even be radar altitude everywhere, of course compensated for ground elevation. As I said, whether it would make sense or even be practical is a different question, but there are a lot of solutions which are thinkable. Stefan |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Stefan" wrote in message ... Just a few examples: It could be QNH everywhere (requires defined QNH regions). If it's QNH everywhere there's no transition altitude. It could be GPS altitude (would even simplify things a lot, but requires all aircraft to be expensively equipped). Heck, it could even be radar altitude everywhere, of course compensated for ground elevation. As I said, whether it would make sense or even be practical is a different question, but there are a lot of solutions which are thinkable. How does one set the barometric pressure for GPS altitude or radar altitude? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
If it's QNH everywhere there's no transition altitude. .... Right. As I understood, you said: This is the only way to set the altimeter. I answered: No, there are a myriade of ways to do it, from which one was chosen, probably for good reasons. Maybe I misunderstood your first statement. Stefan |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 06:14 AM |
| Pressure Altitude and Terminology | Icebound | Piloting | 0 | November 27th 04 10:14 PM |
| GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 01:39 AM |
| GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Piloting | 38 | October 5th 03 01:39 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |