![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
My policy specifically says that I cannot rent to named pilots. I guess
they consider "renting" to be commercial. However, more specific to the original poster, he can buy his own fuel and even help out when it comes time for maintenance. I think the word "renting" set off some alarms within the newsgroup. However, if you actually talked to the agent about specifically waht you want to do, I'd be it wouldn't really be considered "renting". Also, as a side note, do **not** be mis-lead by talks of "open pilot clauses". All policies appear to prevent coverage when pilots flying meet the open pilot requirements but have regular access to the plane. Open pilot is really just for an occasional once-in-awhile thing. My agent says that most insurance companies will not consider someone to be "casual use" if they have their own keys. Going by your friends house and gettnig the keys each time is probably the only way to be considered "casual". -Robert |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Robert M. Gary wrote: Also, as a side note, do **not** be mis-lead by talks of "open pilot clauses". All policies appear to prevent coverage when pilots flying meet the open pilot requirements but have regular access to the plane. Open pilot is really just for an occasional once-in-awhile thing. My agent says that most insurance companies will not consider someone to be "casual use" if they have their own keys. Going by your friends house and gettnig the keys each time is probably the only way to be considered "casual". Another misconception about "open pilot" coverage is that the "open pilot" is covered. That's not generally the case. Under most open pilot clauses, the owner is covered for damage and liablility caused by the open pilot, but the pilot himself is on his own. If you fly an aircraft under an open pilot clause, you'd better have a policy that covers you. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not sure what "generally" means but subrigation is very much over
reported. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Robert M. Gary wrote: I'm not sure what "generally" means but subrigation is very much over reported. "Generally" means in every insurance contract I've had over the last 15 yrs. with most of the available underwriters. I can't speak for every underwriter or individual policy. You have to read your own to be sure. I was not referring to subrogation. I was referring to the fact that the insurance on the plane covers the owner for damage and liablility caused by the open pilot. It does not cover the open pilot. A quick example would be that you borrow your friend's plane under the open pilot clause and crash it into a house. The homeowner sues you (the open pilot) and the owner of the airplane. The insurance company will cover the pilot and pay out, or defend him if necessary. You (the open pilot) are on your own. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Galban wrote: The insurance company will cover the pilot and pay out, or defend him if necessary. You (the open pilot) are on your own. Sorry, that should have read "the insurance company will cover the owner... John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
: I was not referring to subrogation. I was referring to the fact
: that the insurance on the plane covers the owner for damage and : liablility caused by the open pilot. It does not cover the open pilot. : A quick example would be that you borrow your friend's plane under : the open pilot clause and crash it into a house. The homeowner sues : you (the open pilot) and the owner of the airplane. The insurance : company will cover the pilot and pay out, or defend him if necessary. : You (the open pilot) are on your own. Another example, as I understand it, would be suppose you borrow the plane under the open pilot clause and do something horribly stupid... taxi into a light pole for instance. The insurance company will cover the aircraft and owner, but may go after you for the damage. At least that's what I was told.... basically means "open-pilot clause" isn't a good way to fly a plane. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss * * Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Can a Private Pilot tow gliders and get paid? | zatatime | Piloting | 3 | October 17th 04 02:35 AM |
| Can a Private Pilot tow gliders and get paid? | BTIZ | Soaring | 1 | October 17th 04 02:35 AM |
| Private Pilot without Medical -- Sport Pilot operation? | Danny Deger | Piloting | 29 | September 3rd 04 04:56 AM |
| Private Pilot without Medical -- Sport Pilot operation? | Danny Deger | Piloting | 0 | August 30th 04 09:59 PM |