![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Capt. Geoffry Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote: You could attempt a kinda chandelle like turn, but you are starting out nose high, low speed, and straight ahead. It would take a lot of forward stick to keep the G loading below 1 throughout the manouver I would think. This doesn't make sense. The G loading will stay appropriate to your current speed at all times as long as the stick is anywhere except hard back. Above 1, below 1, doesn't matter. Angle of attack is what matters, and the AoA is fine as long as the stick is somewhere near the middle. Right forward is completely unnecessary. I don't think I'd try a chandelle from that position, but the limiting factor would be roll rate and getting in sufficient bank to be useful before you ran out of speed. Slow over the top banked 90 degrees and pulling half a G aroudn the corner would be useful in getting turned around, if you kept the string straight and the stick back not too far. Slow over the top and banked 30 degrees would do you very little good (though I don't think it would hurt). -- Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+- Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O---------- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Mr (or Mrs or Ms or Miss) Soarski,
Whoever you are, please remind me not to stand on or near any airfield where you are flying, as I don't want a glider falling on top of me. Feeding in full rudder after a rope or cable break almost guarantees a spin and once you are in one you will lose at least 150 ft per turn plus another 300ft to recover. I do hope you were not being serious! The correct recovery from a winch launch cable break is to lower the nose fairly rapidly to slightly below the normal approach attitude, allow the speed to build up to the correct approach speed for the day and then decide what to do, depending on your height and landing options ahead. It is usually safer to land ahead if you can. While you are waiting for the nose to come down it is also a good idea to pull the cable release twice to get rid of any remaining broken cable, so it can't get caught round any trees, power lines, etc. From aerotow you are usually in a more level attitude and usually have plenty of speed. If the rope breaks just lower the nose slightly and monitor your airspeed. If you are low you have to land more or less straight ahead. With a bit more height - say 200 ft or more, a 180 degree turn is possible, but must be flown accurately - not skidded round on the rudder. Regards Derek C (UK Instructor) 05:18 02 July 2005 'Soarski' wrote: I have never been in that predicament. Never seen a cable break or lost power at below 200 ft or the tow rope on aero tow. I do have 1000s of hours and acro time. If I would want to land downwind on the runway I was taking off I could be inclined to just kick in full rudder, and make the 180 Turn via a "Hammerhead" I think it is called a "Kehre" in German, or a "Turn? There would be mostly rudder work required, some back preasure on coming out of a dive following the wingover, which is really half a spin. Has anyone ever seen that done? Actually, come to think of it, I have, in an airshow, a long time ago in a clipped wing Cub. I will have to try at altitude, what will need more altitude to recover |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 05:18 02 July 2005, Soarski wrote:
If I would want to land downwind on the runway I was taking off I could be inclined to just kick in full rudder, and make the 180 Turn via a 'Hammerhead' I think it is called a 'Kehre' in German, or a 'Turn? There would be mostly rudder work required, some back preasure on coming out of a dive following the wingover, which is really half a spin. Has anyone ever seen that done? Actually, come to think of it, I have, in an airshow, a long time ago in a clipped wing Cub. I will have to try at altitude, what will need more altitude to recover. DB So you're talking about some sort of stall turn at low speed off a 45 degree upline. I think the speed would be too slow to get any significant yaw. At slow speed, high AoA you'll get a lot of roll with some nose drop, almost a low energy flick/snap roll to a very steep (inverted?) downline. If you're high enough, you can recover. The steep climb rate of a winch launch means that you will then be passing the launch point at low level, heading downwind at high speed through any landing traffic, needing to do a smart 180 to land back on the airfield; not really possible in a K13. This all sounds like a lot of fun but I'm not sure we should be teaching it to pre-solo pilots Pushing over forward very hard after cable break, you could get into a negative flight regime, possibly into an inverted spin? With the typical soaring/training aerofoils used, and at low speed, that would need an incredibly rapid push. Even then, so long as the pilot keeps the rudder centralised, there's no chance of an inverted spin. Winch techniques have evolved over decades with safety as the first priority. There's nothing wrong with a bit of imagination but Soarski, that's a bit too much. Ed |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edward Lockhart wrote:
At 05:18 02 July 2005, Soarski wrote: If I would want to land downwind on the runway I was taking off I could be inclined to just kick in full rudder, and make the 180 Turn via a 'Hammerhead' I think it is called a 'Kehre' in German, or a 'Turn? There would be mostly rudder work required, some back preasure on coming out of a dive following the wingover, which is really half a spin. Has anyone ever seen that done? Actually, come to think of it, I have, in an airshow, a long time ago in a clipped wing Cub. I will have to try at altitude, what will need more altitude to recover. DB So you're talking about some sort of stall turn at low speed off a 45 degree upline. I think the speed would be too slow to get any significant yaw. At slow speed, high AoA you'll get a lot of roll with some nose drop, almost a low energy flick/snap roll to a very steep (inverted?) downline. If you're high enough, you can recover. The steep climb rate of a winch launch means that you will then be passing the launch point at low level, heading downwind at high speed through any landing traffic, needing to do a smart 180 to land back on the airfield; not really possible in a K13. This all sounds like a lot of fun but I'm not sure we should be teaching it to pre-solo pilots Pushing over forward very hard after cable break, you could get into a negative flight regime, possibly into an inverted spin? With the typical soaring/training aerofoils used, and at low speed, that would need an incredibly rapid push. Even then, so long as the pilot keeps the rudder centralised, there's no chance of an inverted spin. Winch techniques have evolved over decades with safety as the first priority. There's nothing wrong with a bit of imagination but Soarski, that's a bit too much. Ed Speaking of over the top. Slingby Swallow takes winch launch to 1100agl. Rolls inverted. Dives out. Loops. Chandelles. Lands. You had to be there. Frank |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 20:30 02 July 2005, F.L. Whiteley wrote:
Speaking of over the top. Slingby Swallow takes winch launch to 1100agl. Rolls inverted. Dives out. Loops. Chandelles. Lands. You had to be there. Frank Pilot by the name of Doug Ross, No 2 GC UK? Before they put the elevator stops on to prevent you doing it. Spoilsports. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Johnstone wrote:
At 20:30 02 July 2005, F.L. Whiteley wrote: Speaking of over the top. Slingby Swallow takes winch launch to 1100agl. Rolls inverted. Dives out. Loops. Chandelles. Lands. You had to be there. Frank Pilot by the name of Doug Ross, No 2 GC UK? Before they put the elevator stops on to prevent you doing it. Spoilsports. No, the inimitable Mick Boyden. The tricky bit is that twist is such that all the flying load is on the tips while inverted. Gotta hope for good glue and no bumps. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ahhh, stepped into a hornet's nest here? The thought came to me after
seeing the rather lengthy tales in the beginning of this thread. I am against yanking the stick forward and then back, hard or fully. So the thought of mostly rudder work, like entering or coming out of a spin or half a spin came to me. Naturally one would not teach that, but on the other hand, some of you might have a "Hammerhead " demonstrated to you, or take some Acro instruction? Edward aparently understood what I was thinking. He is right, one would come out of that half spin recovery too fast which would not work on a tight airfield. What Frank saw after the loop and before the landing with that Swallow might have been a hammerhead rather than a Chandelle, which would have taken too long. Spin entry is faster. Of course, the Swallow is a very light aircraft and can do those manouvers much slower than the glass slippers. In the late 50s a former Luftwaffe Pilot named Karlie Marsen did Acro work out of a winch launch regularly at Flugplatzfests same what Frank saw,.. in a Lo 100.......He was a skier too! Soarski |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Displaced AFSS "controllers" heading for BIL and GRB | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 10th 05 09:22 PM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |