GA headed for regulatory trouble

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:10:26 -0500, "PittsS1C"
wrote in ::

Obviously shooting these a couple of these planes down is impractical. (but
I firmly believe you wouldn't have to kill many before no one would wander
there again)
Are there any other reasonable consequences that would major deterrent? Part
of the problem is that it is not a big enough inconvenience for violators.
I would rather that the aviation community help find a solution before an
irrational governmental body imposes useless painful legislation upon all
the rest of us. We need to "take care of our own".
Is "Federal pound me in the ass" prison enough? (with huge bail, so they
would be massively inconvenienced)

We as pilots would have to support it. Less incursions is safer for us
(the aviation community)

I couldn't agree with you less. I see very little reason for the ADIZ
at all. And our government shooting down innocent citizens for no
crime is tyranny if the first degree. The Department of Homeland
Security needs to rethink this faulted policy that provides no
additional security at all.

Larry Dighera wrote:

AndÂ*ourÂ*governmentÂ*shootingÂ*downÂ*innocentÂ*ci tizensÂ*forÂ*no
crime is tyranny if the first degree.

As awful as that would be, it might wake up the sheep.

- Andrew

Andrew Gideon wrote:

And our government shooting down innocent citizens for no
crime is tyranny if the first degree.

As awful as that would be, it might wake up the sheep.

Did Waco or Ruby Ridge "wake the sheep?"

George Patterson
Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry,
and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing?
Because she smells like a new truck.

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 19:43:47 GMT, George Patterson
wrote in TXXwe.5725$Bn6.4399@trndny08::

Andrew Gideon wrote:

And our government shooting down innocent citizens for no
crime is tyranny if the first degree.

As awful as that would be, it might wake up the sheep.

Did Waco or Ruby Ridge "wake the sheep?"

Isn't sex with the 12 year old daughter of your parishioner illegal?

Larry Dighera wrote:
I couldn't agree with you less. I see very little reason for the ADIZ
at all. And our government shooting down innocent citizens for no
crime is tyranny if the first degree. The Department of Homeland
Security needs to rethink this faulted policy that provides no
additional security at all.

Well stated Sir. Government's answer (it seems) to all of it's various
problems is to implement more restrictions... create more new laws, etc.
These laws really only have an effect on the law abiding citizens of
the country. Criminals, AKA terroists, do not obey laws and could care
less.

Actually they are probably laughing at how much of the freedoms have
been taken away from American citizens because of their actions. Its a joke.

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:57:55 GMT, kontiki
wrote in ::


Actually they are probably laughing at how much of the freedoms have
been taken away from American citizens because of their actions. Its a joke.

When the entire Senate and House of Representatives, the First Lady
and the President of the world's only superpower are forced to flee
_imagined_ danger, it is not really funny; it's pathetic. It makes
our noble nation look like it is lead by a bunch of undignified,
scared little fools. Hmmm... :-)

wrote:
The recent spate of private pilots violating restricted airspace over
Washington raises the thought that some lawmaker is going to decide
that general aviation is a threat to national security. It's only a
matter of time.

You have to expect some of this when you start restricting people's freedoms.
Then beacuse of theses "violations" ever more restrictions seem to come along
and soon there are few left. Maybe that's the real goal.

Phil Boyer will need to get a new bumper sticker. Instead of "I fly a
Cessna 150 , 26 gallons of gas, 90 knots of screaming terror, etc." he'll
have to upgrade it to include the other GA planes, like turboprops like the
King Air.

That guy isn't doing your cause any good. Check out the smirking picture
in Letters section of the USA today that appeared about a week ago. Of
course, right after his most recent appearance, there has been another
intrusion, kids stealing planes, highway landings, etc.

What an arrogant jerk. That's who represents you.

I will be the judge of whom I choose for representation. You, sir,
impress me as an arrogant troll.

Skylune wrote:
Phil Boyer will need to get a new bumper sticker. Instead of "I fly a
Cessna 150 , 26 gallons of gas, 90 knots of screaming terror, etc." he'll
have to upgrade it to include the other GA planes, like turboprops like the
King Air.

That guy isn't doing your cause any good. Check out the smirking picture
in Letters section of the USA today that appeared about a week ago. Of
course, right after his most recent appearance, there has been another
intrusion, kids stealing planes, highway landings, etc.

What an arrogant jerk. That's who represents you.


Skylune is Boyer's ex-wife.
That explains the incessant snotty trolling.