A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

737 off runway, Pearson Toronto



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 2nd 05, 10:43 PM
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Funny how none of the news agencies are saying anything about the lighting.

There was a witness that came on the live feed and talked about what he saw.
He said the plane WAS struck by lightning. I wonder how long it will take
the news agencies to get there?

Dave

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Reports are that it was struck by lighting AFTER it landed, and lost all
controls.

"Skywise" wrote in message
...
CNN showing a Luftanasa 737 skidded off the end of the
runway at Peasron (sp?) airport, Toronto Canada. The plane
is on fire but appears intact. Heavy thunderstorms reported
in the area.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism

Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Blog: http://www.skywise711.com/Blog

Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?





  #2  
Old August 2nd 05, 11:07 PM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Dave" wrote:

Funny how none of the news agencies are saying anything about the lighting.


I don't know about that... CNN and Fox were both saying something about
lightning

--
Bob Noel
no one likes an educated mule

  #3  
Old August 2nd 05, 11:08 PM
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't have access to TV here, they might be saying something different on
there.
The news on the website was saying there was lighting in the area, but
nothing about the plane getting struck. (I will check again)

Dave

"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Dave" wrote:

Funny how none of the news agencies are saying anything about the
lighting.


I don't know about that... CNN and Fox were both saying something about
lightning

--
Bob Noel
no one likes an educated mule



  #5  
Old August 2nd 05, 11:12 PM
CW
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

CBC report no fatalities, 14 minor injuries.

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...ane050802.html

CW.



"Dave" wrote in message
...
I don't have access to TV here, they might be saying something different

on
there.
The news on the website was saying there was lighting in the area, but
nothing about the plane getting struck. (I will check again)

Dave

"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Dave" wrote:

Funny how none of the news agencies are saying anything about the
lighting.


I don't know about that... CNN and Fox were both saying something about
lightning

--
Bob Noel
no one likes an educated mule





  #6  
Old August 2nd 05, 11:53 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave wrote:

Reports are that it was struck by lighting AFTER it landed, and lost all
controls.


Ah, one of the perils of fly by wire...

Matt
  #7  
Old August 3rd 05, 08:40 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Matt,

Reports are that it was struck by lighting AFTER it landed, and lost all
controls.


Ah, one of the perils of fly by wire...


Ok, I'll bite. Gimme facts. You seem to know more than the accident
investigators. Spell it out. PUT UP OUR SHUP UP!

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #8  
Old August 3rd 05, 11:39 AM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thomas Borchert wrote:

Matt,


Reports are that it was struck by lighting AFTER it landed, and lost all
controls.


Ah, one of the perils of fly by wire...



Ok, I'll bite. Gimme facts. You seem to know more than the accident
investigators. Spell it out. PUT UP OUR SHUP UP!


It was a tonque-in-cheek comment. Seems like you were about the only
one who didn't get it. As for your last comment, take a hike on a short
pier.


Matt
  #9  
Old August 3rd 05, 12:27 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Matt,

It was a tonque-in-cheek comment.


In that case, sorry. No way for me to get it. Maybe I should have taken
that pill before going online ;-)

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #10  
Old August 3rd 05, 05:19 PM
Jay Beckman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
Matt,

Reports are that it was struck by lighting AFTER it landed, and lost
all
controls.


Ah, one of the perils of fly by wire...


Ok, I'll bite. Gimme facts. You seem to know more than the accident
investigators. Spell it out. PUT UP OUR SHUP UP!

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)


Weren't you the one who was ripping people on their spelling earlier in this
thread?

The term is: Put Up Or Shut Up...

C'mon..get it right.

Jay Beckman
PP-ASEL
Chandler, AZ


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pilots Slick Piloting 4 November 20th 04 11:21 AM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Piloting 114 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
F15E's trounced by Eurofighters John Cook Military Aviation 193 April 11th 04 03:33 AM
Rwy incursions Hankal Piloting 10 November 16th 03 02:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.