![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Gaquin wrote:
"Bob Moore" wrote in message My thoughts on yesterday's accident. My thoughts were tending in the same direction, Bob. Speculation on the availability of O2, or the system integrity, is fine, but the first and most obvious question to me was as to why the airplane was still at altitude. Job 1, superceding all others, is to get the craft to breathable air. What was going on? All it takes is one body in the cockpit to initiate the descent. The news tonight said the airliner was on autopilot, in climb mode,which it continued in until finally reaching it's service ceiling. My understanding is Job 1 is to put on an oxygen mask, which, if it failed to deliver oxygen, might mean they never get to Job 2 (descend). -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also, many of the high-altitude climbers who do not
use oxygen have shown significant brain damage when cat-scanned. At 14:00 15 August 2005, Stefan wrote: John Kirksey wrote: How, then, can someone like Ed Viesturs repeatedly climb the tallest mountain peaks in the world without supplemental oxygen? Is it because of the slower ascent and the time spent acclimating to the higher altitudes? First, acclimatisation. Second, walking (and climbing) is different from flying. You don't need much brain to walk. When piloting, however, everything is about thinking. And it's the brain which needs the most oxygen. And maybe a third reason: There are exceptional people who are just better suited for such things than you and me. Stefan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stewart Kissel" wrote in message ... Also, many of the high-altitude climbers who do not use oxygen have shown significant brain damage when cat-scanned. Before or after climbing without O2? -- Geoff the sea hawk at wow way d0t com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail Spell checking is left as an excercise for the reader. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stewart Kissel wrote:
Also, many of the high-altitude climbers who do not use oxygen have shown significant brain damage when cat-scanned. Interesting! Do you have a reference? Tony V. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() CO2 is generated by cellular respiration. This is essentially independent of oxygen, as a matter of fact, anaerobic respiration can occur in the absense of adequate oxygen, but it is VERY inefficient, and makes LOTS of waste products. Arterial CO2 concentration, having left the lungs, is around 35-45 torr (mmHg). In mixed venous blood, returning to the lungs, it is around 50 torr/mmhg or so. At sea level, atmospheric CO2 is in the high 20's/low 30's mmhg. The body's buffer system in a healthy individual will RAPIDLY move the CO2 level back towards normal if it vary's too much from those values. So, even at altitude, your venous blood gas values are pretty much normal after one pass around the body. You hold your breath, and this blood with "venous" levels of CO2 will make a second pass, and when it hits the chemo and baro receptors in in your carotid (artery) bodies you will start getting that URGE to breath. All of this is independent of how oxygen is handled by the blood. Each gas's function in the body is more or less independent of each other. Even though your body uses oxygen to make CO2 as a waste product, your body will continue to make CO2 for a short time without adequate oxygen. As an example: the burn in your muscles after a sprint - lactic acid generated along with CO2 when the oxygen requirement of the muscles outstrips the oxygen supply. To say "the lungs stop working" is at best, technically inaccurate. You are just too hypoxic to make the muscles responsible for gas exchange to work properly. Dave |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote:
In general, people can use a cranula or similar device to provide oxygen up to about 20,000' (the FAA limits use of these to 18,000'). These simply bleed oxygen into the air you breathe. Above that, you need a low-pressure mask. These ensure that all you are breathing is oxygen and are good up to about 25,000'. My understanding is cannulas are still effective to at least 25,000', and the FAA mask requirement is only to guard against pilots that might inadvertently breathe through their mouth instead of their nose. The masks I've used all allow ambient air into the mask; i.e., they are not intended to supply only oxygen. They used staged valves for constant flow systems, or just small holes in the sides of the mask for pulse-delivery devices like Mountain High's EDS controller. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article %N5Me.1542$yb.46@trndny01,
George Patterson wrote: Because of this, the FAA requires that a pilot use oxygen if they spend over 30 minutes above 12,500'. My recollection of my O2 training is that the rule is 30 minutes over 10,000 ft, or if you go over 12,500 ft at *all*. But I've only been to about 20,000 ft in a glider, unlike some people I know who have been far higher. -- Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+- Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O---------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
O2 and Cypriot airliner crash | [email protected] | Piloting | 68 | August 25th 05 12:07 PM |