![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's in 14 CFR 1.1:
"Light-sport aircraft means an aircraft, other than a helicopter or powered-lift that, since its original certification, has continued to meet the following: (1) A maximum takeoff weight ... (ii) 1,320 pounds (600 kilograms) for aircraft... (2) A maximum airspeed in level flight with maximum continuous power(VH) of not more than 120 knots CAS...." This certainly uncovers some of the confusion. We need to make sure and distinquish between "light sport aircraft", "experimental light sport aircraft", and aircraft that can be flown by sport pilots. The original question asked about a homebuilt, and specifically an RV-3, so I assumed it would have an experimental certification. My understanding is that it would be possible to take an experimental aircraft, and modify it so that it would meet the limitations of the sport pilot. Not if it had an "original certification" outside the limits. I suppose there's an opening for taking it apart, and building something new from some/all of the parts, but that's more than just modifying it. I don't agree with this. I've certified 3 experimental aircraft, and not one single time has the "maximum airspeed in level flight with maximum continuous power(VH)" ever been listed anywhere. The Vne is listed, but many aircraft have Vne's that can't be achieved in level flight, so it doesn't mean the plane will do it. The operating limitations received from the FAA with the airworthiness certificate don't list ANY speeds, as these must be determined during the phase one test period, and noted in the aircraft log. The log can be modified over time to reflect changes in the aircraft as well, so if modification is made that would reduce the weight, airspeed, etc, it appears to be perfectly legal to change the log to reflect that mod. That does not look like the "exact question" asked above. Let's see... The question I asked AOPA was- "I currently have an RV-3 with a two rotor Mazda engine. If I put a single rotor engine, with far less power, and use a prop that will reduce the top speed to 138 mph, could it be flown by a sport pilot?" Seems pretty close to the exact question to me :-) Cheers, Rusty |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 12:35 PM |
| Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 01:56 AM |
| Weird Experimental Certificate wording - Normal? | Noel Luneau | Soaring | 7 | January 11th 05 03:53 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |
| Onerous OPerating Procedures/Improper (illegal?) Use of Unicom Freq. | rjciii | Soaring | 2 | July 19th 03 08:55 PM |