![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
" wrote:
Too bad they can't say anything good about the good deeds that we in the legal profession provide. A good lawyer is one who is on your side. A bad lawyer is one who is on the other side. ;-) -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Peter R. wrote:
A good lawyer is one who is on your side. A bad lawyer is one who is on the other side. ;-) Ain't that the truth? I was sued a few years ago in a non-aviation matter. I followed my lawyer's advice to the "T". My deposition took 55 minutes; the plaintive's a little over 11 hours. In the end, we didn't pay them dick. Obviously my lawyer was a genius. Their's would have made more money on that case had he flipped burgers for McDonald's instead. That's what he got for taking such a moronic case. Do I have warm and fuzzy feelings for the guy who fought for me? Of course. G |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:08:54 GMT, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN"
wrote in :: Peter R. wrote: A good lawyer is one who is on your side. A bad lawyer is one who is on the other side. ;-) Ain't that the truth? Well, it's half the truth. It's also important that your lawyer is prepared, knows the law, understands the mechanics of the court, is willing to take your side in the matter regardless of how the judge feels about the case, and most importantly, has sufficient fire in his belly to argue persuasively. Often attorneys are reluctant to move for dismissal on technical grounds if it makes the court (or the other attorney) look incompetent, for they may have to present subsequent cases before them in the future. You'd be amazed at how much law must be digested before a winning strategy can be chosen. That requires an experienced and knowledgeable attorney, as well as copious research (for which you may be unwilling to pay). That's why it's important for the client to do as much as possible to assist the attorney. There's little preventing the client from visiting the local law library, and reading revenant texts. The client can also provide his attorney with photographic evidence, contact expert witnesses, and do other investigative work. In the case of FAA related matters, the client can make Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests, and contact regional, district and local personnel for their contributions, and more. The client who sits on his hands, and expects his attorney to do it all, either has very deep pockets or at a substantial disadvantage, IMO. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Opinions on TEK Aircraft Services? | G.R. Patterson III | Owning | 0 | December 24th 03 07:02 AM |
| AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 09:26 PM |
| AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 09:26 PM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 02:27 PM |