A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

TIS and What could have been



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 30th 05, 03:23 AM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TIS and What could have been



Chuck wrote:



So now we have a low wing (my Archer) above a high wing (172) and I
have been cleared to decend.


You were never restricted from descending in the first place.



I think TIS may have saved my ( and others) life today and the FAA is
decomissioning the sites with the explination that ADS-B is going to be
better when they get it implemented in the next few years and an an
inexpensive plane electronic becomes available.


That's correct. TIS was obsolete before it was even commissioned.

  #2  
Old October 30th 05, 12:11 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TIS and What could have been



Newps wrote:

That's correct. TIS was obsolete before it was even commissioned.


Not to mention impractical.


  #3  
Old October 31st 05, 02:59 PM
Chuck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TIS and What could have been

Why so?
I find it very useful and practical when it is available.

Boy, the installer for the mode S a year and a half ago didn't mention
that it was either impractical or obsolete!

  #4  
Old October 31st 05, 05:08 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TIS and What could have been



Chuck wrote:

Why so?
I find it very useful and practical when it is available.

Boy, the installer for the mode S a year and a half ago didn't mention
that it was either impractical or obsolete!


It is impractical from a total systems perspective. It's not unlike TLS
and ILS.

I am sure it is a nice-to-have when you're in the limited service areas.
TCAS, on the other hand, works everywhere independently of the FAA's ATC
system.

It's a niche solution and competes for resources.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.