![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 12-Nov-2005, "Jay Honeck" wrote: Yeah, my near-vision has gone completely to crap in the last few years. I still don't wear bi-focals, but both my eye and medical doctors told me that my days are, indeed, numbered. I can't see diddly on a sectional anymore without holding it four inches from my eyes. Can anyone recommend "progressive" bi-focals? How about TRI-focals? Any benefit there? I use bi-focal glasses with a straight horizontal division between the "far" and "near" parts. This division is positioned rather high, just below the point through which I look when looking straight ahead. In a plane it more or less coincides with the upper edge of the glare shield, so when looking at the instruments I use the "near" part. I bought these glasses some years ago primary for my flying, but nowadays I use it almost exclusively. For computer work only (staring at a monitor for long periods) I have full vision reading glasses. At the start it took some getting used to. In particular when turning your head sideways the lower part of your field of vision seems to move relative to the upper part. However I got used to it fast and nowadays I do not notice it anymore. The only drawback of these glasses is using it while riding a motor cycle. This does not feel good, it seems in this case you use the lower part of your field of vision for positioning. For this activity I have full vision "far" seeing glasses. Things I think are important: - Use glass for better scratch resistance and a better quality of the anti-reflection layer; - The division between far- and near sight portion has to be perfectly horizontal and be at the same position for both glasses; - The optical center of the lenses has to coincide as perfectly as possible with the center of your pupils. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Things I think are important:
- Use glass for better scratch resistance and a better quality of the anti-reflection layer; - The division between far- and near sight portion has to be perfectly horizontal and be at the same position for both glasses; - The optical center of the lenses has to coincide as perfectly as possible with the center of your pupils. Thanks for your input. My far-vision prescription is way too bad for real "glass" lenses anymore, so I'm stuck with the super-expensive poly-carbonate --or the 14-ounce Coke bottle lenses... I'll keep your other advice in mind when the time comes. I'm still fighting getting them. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Ten Years of Flying | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | February 19th 05 03:05 PM |
| HAVE YOU HEARD THE GOOD NEWS! | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | January 26th 05 08:08 PM |
| millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 6th 04 12:14 AM |
| bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 08:20 PM |