A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ADF Required



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 26th 04, 02:57 AM
Richard Hertz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Casey Wilson" wrote in message
...

"Richard Hertz" wrote in message
t...

"Newps" wrote in message
news:OU1%b.57647$4o.76032@attbi_s52...


Scott wrote:

Can the approach be flown leagally by requesting alternate
missed approach instructions that don't require and ADF?


Now that's a great question. I suppose ATC can override anything

really.

There is no situation where the plate says ADF required that GPS

cannot
substitute. And yes ATC can come up with alternate missed

instructions.

Um, filing that airport as the alternate (when you are required to have

an
alternate) (assuming it is the only approach) and you do not have an ADF

is
one example I can think of.


Hmmm, I have a problem with this. Aren't you risking a slap on the wrist

if
you file an airport as an alternate KNOWING that you didn't have the
required equipment to begin with. Not to mention that you are playing with
your next birthday. Note, I'm not talking about an enroute failure of the
instrument.


I am not sure you understood my point. The poster I replied to says an IFR
GPS can replace ADF any time. I suggested that is not the case.
Specifically, filing for an alternate that has an approach that says "ADF
required" when you do not have an ADF installed (even if you have a gps) and
there are no other approaches suitable is not legal. You can't substitute
GPS for ADF for an alternat apprch. (filed)

I think you have come to the same conclusion, though not in the same way?





  #2  
Old February 26th 04, 05:18 PM
Casey Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard Hertz" wrote in message
t...

"Casey Wilson" wrote in message
...

"Richard Hertz" wrote in message
t...

"Newps" wrote in message
news:OU1%b.57647$4o.76032@attbi_s52...


Scott wrote:

Can the approach be flown leagally by requesting alternate
missed approach instructions that don't require and ADF?


Now that's a great question. I suppose ATC can override anything

really.

There is no situation where the plate says ADF required that GPS

cannot
substitute. And yes ATC can come up with alternate missed

instructions.

Um, filing that airport as the alternate (when you are required to

have
an
alternate) (assuming it is the only approach) and you do not have an

ADF
is
one example I can think of.


Hmmm, I have a problem with this. Aren't you risking a slap on the wrist

if
you file an airport as an alternate KNOWING that you didn't have the
required equipment to begin with. Not to mention that you are playing

with
your next birthday. Note, I'm not talking about an enroute failure of

the
instrument.


I am not sure you understood my point. The poster I replied to says an

IFR
GPS can replace ADF any time. I suggested that is not the case.
Specifically, filing for an alternate that has an approach that says "ADF
required" when you do not have an ADF installed (even if you have a gps)

and
there are no other approaches suitable is not legal. You can't

substitute
GPS for ADF for an alternat apprch. (filed)

I think you have come to the same conclusion, though not in the same way?


Well, in did misunderstand your point -- but, now that you've clarified
it, I disagree. My interpretation is that an IFR approved GPS will stand in
for the ADF "at any time." (Quote marks are mine for emphasis.) In other
words, if the airplane is IFR GPS equipped, it does not need an ADF for that
alternate to be valid when filing the flight plan.
I got the impression that the pilot intended to file with a known faulty
ADF and no GPS with the intention of requesting a modified missed-approach
for the alternate -- if he needed to go there.
I'm probably reading into the subject. We need a FSDO to answer this
one.


  #3  
Old February 27th 04, 08:27 AM
Jim Knoyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Earlier mention of hanging an 'inop' sticker reminded me of
an occasion back around '70 when we had to inop the ADF
on either a DC8 or 727. Somebody asked if they really needed
an ADF? One of the old timers wisecracked, "How else can
they learn the scores of the ball games."

Oddly enough, about a month later the company started a project
where we installed some wires and installed a switch on the S/O's
panel through out our fairly large fleet. With a flip of this switch
all of the passengers back in the cabin could listen to anything
dialed into the S/O's audio panel. Just in time for the World Series.

JK
( Return to serious mode )


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which aircraft certification is required for R&D? Netgeek Home Built 5 November 23rd 04 06:59 AM
required eqipment for ifr Mark Instrument Flight Rules 23 December 19th 03 03:22 PM
required readback on clearance [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 15 September 17th 03 05:33 PM
Why is ADF required on ILS approach? Rich Raine Instrument Flight Rules 27 August 1st 03 06:14 PM
Radio license required? Marty Ross Instrument Flight Rules 10 July 17th 03 10:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.