![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Casey Wilson" wrote in message ... "Richard Hertz" wrote in message t... "Newps" wrote in message news:OU1%b.57647$4o.76032@attbi_s52... Scott wrote: Can the approach be flown leagally by requesting alternate missed approach instructions that don't require and ADF? Now that's a great question. I suppose ATC can override anything really. There is no situation where the plate says ADF required that GPS cannot substitute. And yes ATC can come up with alternate missed instructions. Um, filing that airport as the alternate (when you are required to have an alternate) (assuming it is the only approach) and you do not have an ADF is one example I can think of. Hmmm, I have a problem with this. Aren't you risking a slap on the wrist if you file an airport as an alternate KNOWING that you didn't have the required equipment to begin with. Not to mention that you are playing with your next birthday. Note, I'm not talking about an enroute failure of the instrument. I am not sure you understood my point. The poster I replied to says an IFR GPS can replace ADF any time. I suggested that is not the case. Specifically, filing for an alternate that has an approach that says "ADF required" when you do not have an ADF installed (even if you have a gps) and there are no other approaches suitable is not legal. You can't substitute GPS for ADF for an alternat apprch. (filed) I think you have come to the same conclusion, though not in the same way? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Richard Hertz" wrote in message t... "Casey Wilson" wrote in message ... "Richard Hertz" wrote in message t... "Newps" wrote in message news:OU1%b.57647$4o.76032@attbi_s52... Scott wrote: Can the approach be flown leagally by requesting alternate missed approach instructions that don't require and ADF? Now that's a great question. I suppose ATC can override anything really. There is no situation where the plate says ADF required that GPS cannot substitute. And yes ATC can come up with alternate missed instructions. Um, filing that airport as the alternate (when you are required to have an alternate) (assuming it is the only approach) and you do not have an ADF is one example I can think of. Hmmm, I have a problem with this. Aren't you risking a slap on the wrist if you file an airport as an alternate KNOWING that you didn't have the required equipment to begin with. Not to mention that you are playing with your next birthday. Note, I'm not talking about an enroute failure of the instrument. I am not sure you understood my point. The poster I replied to says an IFR GPS can replace ADF any time. I suggested that is not the case. Specifically, filing for an alternate that has an approach that says "ADF required" when you do not have an ADF installed (even if you have a gps) and there are no other approaches suitable is not legal. You can't substitute GPS for ADF for an alternat apprch. (filed) I think you have come to the same conclusion, though not in the same way? Well, in did misunderstand your point -- but, now that you've clarified it, I disagree. My interpretation is that an IFR approved GPS will stand in for the ADF "at any time." (Quote marks are mine for emphasis.) In other words, if the airplane is IFR GPS equipped, it does not need an ADF for that alternate to be valid when filing the flight plan. I got the impression that the pilot intended to file with a known faulty ADF and no GPS with the intention of requesting a modified missed-approach for the alternate -- if he needed to go there. I'm probably reading into the subject. We need a FSDO to answer this one. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Earlier mention of hanging an 'inop' sticker reminded me of
an occasion back around '70 when we had to inop the ADF on either a DC8 or 727. Somebody asked if they really needed an ADF? One of the old timers wisecracked, "How else can they learn the scores of the ball games." Oddly enough, about a month later the company started a project where we installed some wires and installed a switch on the S/O's panel through out our fairly large fleet. With a flip of this switch all of the passengers back in the cabin could listen to anything dialed into the S/O's audio panel. Just in time for the World Series. JK ( Return to serious mode ) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which aircraft certification is required for R&D? | Netgeek | Home Built | 5 | November 23rd 04 06:59 AM |
| required eqipment for ifr | Mark | Instrument Flight Rules | 23 | December 19th 03 03:22 PM |
| required readback on clearance | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | September 17th 03 05:33 PM |
| Why is ADF required on ILS approach? | Rich Raine | Instrument Flight Rules | 27 | August 1st 03 06:14 PM |
| Radio license required? | Marty Ross | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 17th 03 10:58 PM |