A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Angry [More Info]



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 29th 05, 10:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry [More Info]

Javier Henderson wrote:
Hilton wrote:
Neil wrote:
3. "a flight plan was not filed for the cross-country flight"

Would that have made a difference?


Some pilots on this NG were asking if he was IFR.


I don't follow you. He could've asked for a pop-up clearance.


I'm not sure what you're not following, I simply cut-n-pasted from the
report; i.e. he had not filed, period. So no, he wasn't IFR, had no
instrument rating, and did not ask for a pop up (according to the report -
see my previous post for the link).

Hilton


  #2  
Old December 30th 05, 02:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry [More Info]

Javier Henderson wrote:
3. "a flight plan was not filed for the cross-country flight"
Would that have made a difference?

Some pilots on this NG were asking if he was IFR.

I don't follow you. He could've asked for a pop-up clearance.


isn't a pop-up clearance a flight plan? you just happen to
file it in the air...

--Sylvain
  #3  
Old December 29th 05, 07:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry [More Info]


"Hilton" wrote in message
ink.net...
Neil wrote:
3. "a flight plan was not filed for the cross-country flight"

Would that have made a difference?


Some pilots on this NG were asking if he was IFR.


This case really amazes me. The guy had his PPL for a month or so, and had
no problem at all with departing at night, in the rain, with his wife, and 2
kids they planned to adopt.


  #4  
Old December 29th 05, 10:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry [More Info]

Tom wrote:

Hilton wrote:
Neil wrote:
3. "a flight plan was not filed for the cross-country flight"

Would that have made a difference?


Some pilots on this NG were asking if he was IFR.


This case really amazes me. The guy had his PPL for a month or so, and
had
no problem at all with departing at night, in the rain, with his wife, and
2
kids they planned to adopt.


Tom, it's unbelievable isn't it. Let's ignore what could have or should
have been taught to him, syllabii etc. How about common sense??? And also
perhaps another example (together with the stats) that Private pilots need
more (real) instrument time that what's required by Part 61.

Hilton


  #5  
Old December 31st 05, 04:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry [More Info]

This case really amazes me. The guy had his PPL for a month or so, and
had
no problem at all with departing at night, in the rain, with his wife,
and 2
kids they planned to adopt.


Tom, it's unbelievable isn't it. Let's ignore what could have or should
have been taught to him, syllabii etc. How about common sense??? And
also perhaps another example (together with the stats) that Private pilots
need more (real) instrument time that what's required by Part 61.


Do you really think that would have helped?

This guy launched into conditions that would have given pause to many
experienced instrument-rated pilots. He clearly had no common sense, and
even less concern for his family. Extra training wouldn't hurt, but it
also won't help guys like this.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #6  
Old December 31st 05, 05:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry [More Info]

Hilton wrote:

And also
perhaps another example (together with the stats) that Private pilots need
more (real) instrument time that what's required by Part 61.


Additional practice on instruments won't help someone scud-run. The only thing
that would have saved this guy once he decided to launch would have been the
ability to file IFR.

George Patterson
Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to
your slightly older self.
  #7  
Old December 30th 05, 04:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry [More Info]


Hilton wrote:
Hi,

Unfortunately some folks have degraded the initial thread to some political
rambling, so I figured I'd post this to a new thread.

As I predicted:
1. "non-instrument rated private pilot"
2. "Night instrument meteorological conditions prevailed"
3. "a flight plan was not filed for the cross-country flight"
4. "As the airplane proceeded east from the departure airport, the pilot
reported that he was having trouble maintaining outside visual contact and
controlling the airplane and wanted help getting back to the airport."

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...27X02016&key=1

I am a CFI-I and I wouldn't have taken my wife and two kids up on that
flight in those conditions.


I certainly would have in my Mooney but I'd have gone IFR. Of course I
know that there are a few on this list that consider single engine
planes far too dangerous for IFR.

-Robert, CFI

  #8  
Old December 31st 05, 08:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry [More Info]

Neither would I.

One wonders what was so pressing that he just had to go at this time. I
am sure he did not just wake up that morning and say to himself, "Today
I am going to kill myself and my whole family." Well, reasonably sure,
anyway. Maybe that is exactly what he did.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Angry Hilton Piloting 227 January 5th 06 08:33 AM
Aircraft Spruce: Abused Customers and Fourteen More Angry Comments -- More to Come jls Home Built 2 February 6th 05 08:32 AM
If true, this makes me really angry (Buzzing Pilot kills 9 year-old son) Hilton Piloting 2 November 29th 04 05:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.