Cheep flying

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in message
...

"Ed Sullivan" wrote in message
news
How about this puppy

http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/Vi...vidId=51023&ca


It's a gyroplane with folding rotor. Just goes to prove that the patent
office is doing any "prior art" checks before they give the things out.


Did you read the claims? The patent could cover something like the
particular method for folding the rotors, the way the latch works, or some
bit of the design.

The description of the perfered embodyment may cover basic things like
gyrocopters and how they work, but the only thing that is actually protected
by the patent is what is in the clams.

--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
Spell checking is left as an excercise for the reader.

The "CHEEPEST" flying I know of is my canary!
tom

when is $25,000 cheap?
"Ed Sullivan" wrote in message
news
How about this puppy

http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/Vi...vidId=51023&ca

"Tater Schuld" wrote in message
...
when is $25,000 cheap?
"Ed Sullivan" wrote in message
news
How about this puppy


http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/Vi...vidId=51023&ca

Compared to $325,000, it is cheap. Compared to some SUV's and mini-vans, it
is cheap.

Tell us, tater, why are you so hung up on money? Do you really expect to
get a useful flying machine cheap? Do you value your life so little?

Are you unable to get a job that pays well enough, to pay for something as
low as $25,000?

I don't get it. What reality do you live in, that makes flying a cheap
hobby, or way of life?
--
Jim in NC

I was going to say that he must be related to Moeller, but his flies so
he can't be...

denny

Denny wrote:
I was going to say that he must be related to Moeller, but his flies so
he can't be...

denny

Such flying machines will never be used for commuting to any extent.
Just picture the aerial traffic problems and the infa structure that
would be required to control it. The dreams of everyone having one
will never happen no matter how cheap and practical they get due to the
mayhem that would ensue. Jeez, we can't even keep cars from running
into each other.

Harry K

In article .com,
"Harry K" wrote:

Denny wrote:
I was going to say that he must be related to Moeller, but his flies so
he can't be...

denny

Such flying machines will never be used for commuting to any extent.
Just picture the aerial traffic problems and the infa structure that
would be required to control it. The dreams of everyone having one
will never happen no matter how cheap and practical they get due to the
mayhem that would ensue. Jeez, we can't even keep cars from running
into each other.

Harry K

"Never" is a pretty strong word, Harry. It wasn't so long ago that the
idea of everyone owning a car was laughable. And don't forget the idea
(which has been credited to various people by creative historians) that
the worldwide market for computers might number in the tens.

The flying motorcycle in question might not be the ubiquitous personal
transport of tomorrow any more than Moeller's skycar, but serious
thinkers are already planning for the Jetson's. Small planes flown by
computer, possibly in ground effect, could eliminate congestion, shorten
commutes, and massively reduce the need for building and maintaining
highways.

Smitty

"Smitty Two" wrote

Small planes flown by
computer, possibly in ground effect, could eliminate congestion, shorten
commutes, and massively reduce the need for building and maintaining
highways.

They would need highways, if they were in ground effect, no?
--
Jim in NC

In article ,
"Morgans" wrote:

"Smitty Two" wrote

Small planes flown by
computer, possibly in ground effect, could eliminate congestion, shorten
commutes, and massively reduce the need for building and maintaining
highways.

They would need highways, if they were in ground effect, no?

Well, maybe a bulldozed path, sans concrete and all those other
finishing touches.

"Smitty Two" wrote in message

The flying motorcycle in question might not be the ubiquitous personal
transport of tomorrow any more than Moeller's skycar, but serious
thinkers are already planning for the Jetson's. Small planes flown by
computer, possibly in ground effect, could eliminate congestion, shorten
commutes, and massively reduce the need for building and maintaining
highways.

It's fiine that people are thinking about it. But in this case without some
huge technology shift it'll remain a dream. You require something that will
haul the family, groceries, vacation luggage and fly in bad weather and
severe wind. And yet be controllable by your average cellphone talker.
Nobody is going to take on remote piloting liabilities. Remember that all
this has to be cheaper than commuting in a car, in the face of rising energy
costs. On top of all that you have a fair percentage of the population who
are scared to death of the notion of flight.

And to be honest, I'd rather flying remained the domain of the few who
really appreciate it.