|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
February 27th 06, 08:31 PM
posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
|
|||
|
|||
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:52:12 GMT, TRUTH wrote:
mrtravel wrote in .com: TRUTH wrote: Let me clarify... Regardless of its effect on the fire, the point is that it was placed in test mode *on the morning of 9/11*. So? If there was no effect, then what difference does it make. On the morning of 9/11, I suspect the firemen were more concerned with WTC 1 and 2. If explosives were used to bring down WTC 1,2, and 7, what difference would turning off the fire alarm make? The point is why would they put the alarm in test mode, on 9/11? You are the one who keeps claiming this as if it were a significant fact, it is up to YOU to tell us why it is significant. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Miss L. Toe | Piloting | 11 | February 23rd 06 03:25 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Jim Macklin | Piloting | 12 | February 22nd 06 11:09 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Bob Gardner | Piloting | 18 | February 22nd 06 09:25 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Scott M. Kozel | Piloting | 1 | February 22nd 06 04:38 AM |
Hybrid Mode
