![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael Ware" wrote in message
... "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:Tf3Pf.116007$QW2.78328@dukeread08... A commercial pilot with minimum time can be hired by any plane owner to fly their airplane under part 91, anywhere in the world, under IFR or VFR. They just can't carry passengers or cargo "for hire." They can't? Please explain. §61.133 says you can. I am curious about the ins and outs of this myself. And could somebody explain, maybe by example, what 'holding out' means? What Jim means is that having a commercial certificate isn't a *sufficient* condition for carrying passengers or cargo for hire. That's actually slightly inaccurate, because there are some narrow exceptions, but generally speaking carriage of passengers or cargo for hire requires not only a commercial certificate, but compliance with other regulations (Parts 119 and 135, as Bob mentions, are the most common ones to run into, though you could of course do it under Part 121 as well). You can't use a Private Pilot certificate to work for a commercial operation -- you need a Commercial or ATP -- but having a Commercial pilot certificate is not sufficient to make a commercial operation legal. There are other rules that need to be complied with as well. As far as what "holding out" means, the FAA has failed to provide a concrete definition. However, generally speaking if a pilot demonstrates a willingness to fly the general public, they are "holding out". A pilot with a commercial certificate can do very limited passenger or cargo flying for people with whom they already have an existing relationship, and where they are not providing the aircraft, but even there anything more than the occasional contract job is likely to run afoul of an FAA inspector. Pete |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
However, generally speaking if a pilot demonstrates a
willingness to fly the general public, they are "holding out". And getting known for offering to fly people hanging around the airport fence demonstrates a willingness to fly the general public. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jose" wrote in message
... And getting known for offering to fly people hanging around the airport fence demonstrates a willingness to fly the general public. You keep forgetting the "commercial operation" component of the issue. Without compensation, there is no holding out as a commercial operation. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
(from Peter Duniho)
You keep forgetting the "commercial operation" component of the issue. Without compensation, there is no holding out as a commercial operation. Maybe (only maybe) so, but the FAA has rather creative definitions of "compensation". I would never have considered recording the flight in a logbook (a history of what actually happened) "compensation", nor does it seem right that the fact that I can use this experience (which actually happened) to demonstrate to the FAA that I am worthy of an advanced rating to be "compensation" either. (from Jim Macklin) Any private pilot may offer, on a bulletin board a FREE ride home. But if you are wanting to share the cost, several checks are required. 1. The pilot is going anyway, whether anybody else wants to go. 2. The offer cannot be made as a public offering, but only to friends. 3. Costs must be shared which means the pilot must pay at least the pro rata share, your passengers cannot pay all the costs. 1 and 2 are not enumerated in the FARs. They are made up out of whole cloth. The FAA can do that and get away with it. And as for (1), "I am going to fly for three hours =anyway=. Wanna come with me? I don't care where we go." Legal? Where in the FARs? Having made the offer, and having no takers, is it legal to consider the weather, the condition of the aircraft, and the condition of the pilot, and decide to not fly? Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The FAA lawyers make the rules. For instance, a brand new
private pilot may change a tire, but cannot work on the brakes on the same wheel. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Jose" wrote in message et... | (from Peter Duniho) | You keep forgetting the "commercial operation" component of the issue. | Without compensation, there is no holding out as a commercial operation. | | Maybe (only maybe) so, but the FAA has rather creative definitions of | "compensation". I would never have considered recording the flight in a | logbook (a history of what actually happened) "compensation", nor does | it seem right that the fact that I can use this experience (which | actually happened) to demonstrate to the FAA that I am worthy of an | advanced rating to be "compensation" either. | | (from Jim Macklin) | Any private pilot may offer, on a bulletin board a FREE ride | home. But if you are wanting to share the cost, several | checks are required. | 1. The pilot is going anyway, whether anybody else wants to | go. | 2. The offer cannot be made as a public offering, but only | to friends. | 3. Costs must be shared which means the pilot must pay at | least the pro rata share, your passengers cannot pay all the | costs. | | 1 and 2 are not enumerated in the FARs. They are made up out of whole | cloth. The FAA can do that and get away with it. | | And as for (1), "I am going to fly for three hours =anyway=. Wanna come | with me? I don't care where we go." | | Legal? Where in the FARs? | | Having made the offer, and having no takers, is it legal to consider the | weather, the condition of the aircraft, and the condition of the pilot, | and decide to not fly? | | Jose | -- | Money: what you need when you run out of brains. | for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
The FAA lawyers make the rules. For instance, a brand new
private pilot may change a tire, but cannot work on the brakes on the same wheel. Yes, but those rules are written down in a place labled "rules", where we can all see them. The FAA also makes other rules that it keeps to itself, and trots them out when convenient. Their definition of "compensation" is one such. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:JktPf.116461$QW2.88175@dukeread08... The FAA lawyers make the rules. For instance, a brand new private pilot may change a tire, but cannot work on the brakes on the same wheel. My wife and daughter can change a tire on the car, but neither of them could do a brake job on those cars. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Changing a tire on an airplane requires removal of the brake
assembly, perhaps splitting the wheel halves and installing the new tire on the old wheel and properly torquring the wheel bolts. Then the wheel must be installed after packing the cleaned and inspected wheel bearing. Changing a tire on an airplane is more like changing the front hub on a car. The FAA assumes that all work allowed under the term, "preventative maintenance" by a private pilot will be done using the tools, techniques and procedures as a licensed A&P would use. On my car, I can do just as most oil change shops do, get under the vehicle, remove the drain plug, remove the old oil filter, reinstall the drain plug, install a new oil filter, then pour 4 or 5 quarts of oil in the engine. An aircraft oil change requires the additional steps of cleaning oil screens and inspecting for metal and cutting the old oil filter open and examining the paper for metal. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:JktPf.116461$QW2.88175@dukeread08... | The FAA lawyers make the rules. For instance, a brand new | private pilot may change a tire, but cannot work on the | brakes on the same wheel. | | My wife and daughter can change a tire on the car, but neither of them could | do a brake job on those cars. | | | | |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
But an offer of a free ride is different from a $10 ride.
"Jose" wrote in message ... | However, generally speaking if a pilot demonstrates a | willingness to fly the general public, they are "holding out". | | And getting known for offering to fly people hanging around the airport | fence demonstrates a willingness to fly the general public. | | Jose | -- | Money: what you need when you run out of brains. | for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Commercial rating: complex aircraft required aircraft for practical test? | Marc J. Zeitlin | Piloting | 22 | November 24th 05 05:11 AM |
| Commercial rating: Am I wrong here? | gatt | Piloting | 12 | November 21st 05 01:35 AM |
| Skip the IR rating and go straight to commercial and CFI? | [email protected] | Piloting | 17 | May 20th 05 03:50 AM |
| "I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 10th 04 12:35 AM |
| rotorcraft commercial rating or better rating advice | Rick Cook | Rotorcraft | 0 | October 13th 03 05:49 PM |