A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

State of GA safety (2005 Nall Report)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 10th 06, 07:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default State of GA safety (2005 Nall Report)


"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
oups.com...
Clustering can reduce the rate for one year and elevate it for another
year. However, the report shows that accident rates have been declining
for the past 10 years, which is a significant point.


Jose wrote:
I read on AvWeb today the '05 Nall Report is out, and apparently 2004
was a historic low for aviation accidents. This led me to question what
next year's report will look like after considering the spate of GA
accidents that we've all read about in the last year or so. Maybe it's
just a question of perception? Or, are pilots just getting too
complacent when they strap into their aircraft?


Or maybe it's just a statistical artifact. Shift a few accidents from
December to January, and shift a few others from next January to this
December, and you have a banner year for airplane crashes caused simply
by the artificial boundaries of the sample set.


"Shift" as in reporting a December accident as if it occured in January?



  #2  
Old March 10th 06, 09:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default State of GA safety (2005 Nall Report)

"Shift" as in reporting a December accident as if it occured in January?

No, shift as having an accident in December instead of January.

Jose
--
Money: what you need when you run out of brains.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #3  
Old March 10th 06, 12:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default State of GA safety (2005 Nall Report)

wrote in message
ups.com...
I read on AvWeb today the '05 Nall Report is out, and apparently 2004
was a historic low for aviation accidents. This led me to question what
next year's report will look like after considering the spate of GA
accidents that we've all read about in the last year or so. Maybe it's
just a question of perception? Or, are pilots just getting too
complacent when they strap into their aircraft?


You mean "considering the spate of people posting every GA accident they
come across"...

I don't see how the morbid fascination of some individuals here could have
any effect on the actual number of accidents.

--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
Spell checking is left as an excercise for the reader.


  #4  
Old March 10th 06, 02:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default State of GA safety (2005 Nall Report)

You mean "considering the spate of people posting every GA accident they
come across"...

Well, as I am a frequent visitor to this forum I suppose that could
have influenced my perception.

I don't see how the morbid fascination of some individuals here could have

any effect on the actual number of accidents.

It doesn't.

  #5  
Old March 10th 06, 09:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default State of GA safety (2005 Nall Report)

For those who want to do their own statistical analysis, this is an
interesting site:

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/query.asp


Limit the date range to Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2005 and plug in your favorite
manufacturer in the Make/Model box.
You'd be amazed.




wrote in message
ups.com...
I read on AvWeb today the '05 Nall Report is out, and apparently 2004
was a historic low for aviation accidents. This led me to question what
next year's report will look like after considering the spate of GA
accidents that we've all read about in the last year or so. Maybe it's
just a question of perception? Or, are pilots just getting too
complacent when they strap into their aircraft?



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NTSB: USAF included? Larry Dighera Piloting 10 September 11th 05 10:33 AM
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? Tim Epstein Piloting 7 August 4th 05 05:20 PM
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements me Military Aviation 146 January 15th 04 10:13 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.