![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is the basic method to set maneuvering speed:
The Maneuvering Speed is the minimum speed at which the wing can produce lift equal to the design load limit. (in positive G's) Below this speed the wing can not produce enough lift to overstress the aircraft, no matter what angle of attack is used. Rough air speed is generally set so that a certain limit of turbulence will not over stress the aircraft. Todd 3S |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
toad wrote:
This is the basic method to set maneuvering speed: The Maneuvering Speed is the minimum speed at which the wing can produce lift equal to the design load limit. (in positive G's) Below this speed the wing can not produce enough lift to overstress the aircraft, no matter what angle of attack is used. Maneuvering speed assumes max gross weight. If you're flying lighter the wing can make enough lift to break. Shawn |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Shawn wrote: toad wrote: This is the basic method to set maneuvering speed: The Maneuvering Speed is the minimum speed at which the wing can produce lift equal to the design load limit. (in positive G's) Below this speed the wing can not produce enough lift to overstress the aircraft, no matter what angle of attack is used. Maneuvering speed assumes max gross weight. If you're flying lighter the wing can make enough lift to break. Shawn This is true, at lighter weights the maneuvering speed goes down, since the airframe is only strong enough for X g's. Toad |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shawn wrote:
toad wrote: This is the basic method to set maneuvering speed: The Maneuvering Speed is the minimum speed at which the wing can produce lift equal to the design load limit. (in positive G's) Below this speed the wing can not produce enough lift to overstress the aircraft, no matter what angle of attack is used. Maneuvering speed assumes max gross weight. If you're flying lighter the wing can make enough lift to break. So, for gliders, the flight manual figure only applies if you are carrying full water ballast, and you are supposed to guess at what is when the glider is unballasted? -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA www.motorglider.org - Download "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell wrote:
Shawn wrote: toad wrote: This is the basic method to set maneuvering speed: The Maneuvering Speed is the minimum speed at which the wing can produce lift equal to the design load limit. (in positive G's) Below this speed the wing can not produce enough lift to overstress the aircraft, no matter what angle of attack is used. Maneuvering speed assumes max gross weight. If you're flying lighter the wing can make enough lift to break. So, for gliders, the flight manual figure only applies if you are carrying full water ballast, and you are supposed to guess at what is when the glider is unballasted? No, just calculate it by taking the square root of the mass/max gross and multiply that by Va, in the cockpit, in rotor, while dropping below glide to the nearest safe field. Simple! The physics argument for Va decreasing with lower mass makes sense. However, the legal argument for what maneuvering speed should be used would support the notion of a constant Va at all weights. Shawn |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you sure they would not use a worst case scenario?
Paul Shawn wrote: Maneuvering speed assumes max gross weight. If you're flying lighter the wing can make enough lift to break. Shawn |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you sure they would not use a worst case scenario?
Paul Shawn wrote: Maneuvering speed assumes max gross weight. If you're flying lighter the wing can make enough lift to break. Shawn |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Galloway wrote:
A quick scout through the BGA datasheets seems to show a trend that for modern single seaters the rough air and manouevring speeds are the same Yes, but I don't believe it's really for technical reasons. I rather suspect that the manufactorer defines it deliberately that way to keep things simple for the pilot. (Quick test: Do you know whether the green arc defines maneuvring speed or rough air speed?) Stefan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Stefan wrote: John Galloway wrote: A quick scout through the BGA datasheets seems to show a trend that for modern single seaters the rough air and manouevring speeds are the same Yes, but I don't believe it's really for technical reasons. I rather suspect that the manufactorer defines it deliberately that way to keep things simple for the pilot. (Quick test: Do you know whether the green arc defines maneuvring speed or rough air speed?) Manouevring. Rough air places lower loads on a structure than do extreme control deflections, so rough air speed will always be the same as or higher than manouevring speed, never lower. -- Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+- Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O---------- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 00:24:17 UTC, Bruce Hoult wrote:
: Rough air places lower loads on a structure than do extreme control : deflections Surely that depends entirely on just how rough the air is? Ian -- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Final Glide: Edward "Ted" Pearson | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | December 4th 05 04:44 PM |
Roger Ruch - Final Glide | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | November 25th 05 09:12 AM |
Final Glide - Allan MacNicol | Roy Bourgeois | Soaring | 3 | July 9th 05 06:53 PM |
Australian Shareware Final Glide Calculator | Neptune | Soaring | 0 | September 6th 04 01:53 AM |
Final Glide for Don Dorrell | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 2 | December 2nd 03 02:56 PM |