![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm looking for information on the Schiebe/Alliance SF-34. Would any of
our German or French brothers care to comment on the suitability of the SF-34 as a club training glider? Handling qualities, comfort, durability, soaring performance? To my knowledge, there are only two examples of this glider in the U.S. I flew one of them many years ago and my memory of the experience is fading. Thanks, Wallace |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have a SF-34 in our club as a trainer on "plastic", because we cannot
afford a more expensive two-seater as the ASK-21 we have also 2 ASK-13 for initial training on "wood" The SF-34 is heavier on the stick, a real two-seater I have flown the French version Alliance-34 a few times The controls of the Alliance are easier, more like a single-seater In France this glider is used for first solos The soaring performances of both are rather modest, but OK for the price Jan Waumans Belgium "Wallace Berry" wrote in message ... I'm looking for information on the Schiebe/Alliance SF-34. Would any of our German or French brothers care to comment on the suitability of the SF-34 as a club training glider? Handling qualities, comfort, durability, soaring performance? To my knowledge, there are only two examples of this glider in the U.S. I flew one of them many years ago and my memory of the experience is fading. Thanks, Wallace |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "JW"
wrote: We have a SF-34 in our club as a trainer on "plastic", because we cannot afford a more expensive two-seater as the ASK-21 we have also 2 ASK-13 for initial training on "wood" The SF-34 is heavier on the stick, a real two-seater I have flown the French version Alliance-34 a few times The controls of the Alliance are easier, more like a single-seater In France this glider is used for first solos The soaring performances of both are rather modest, but OK for the price Jan Waumans Belgium Great information. Thanks Jan. My club is in the same situation. We need another two seater, we prefer plastic, but can't afford an ASK-21 or even a Grob. A Schiebe SF-34 has been offered to us for a reasonable price. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To be honest the ASK-13's fly more than the SF
the cost per minute is lower, and instructors love the ASK-13 JW "Wallace Berry" wrote in message ... In article , "JW" wrote: We have a SF-34 in our club as a trainer on "plastic", because we cannot afford a more expensive two-seater as the ASK-21 we have also 2 ASK-13 for initial training on "wood" The SF-34 is heavier on the stick, a real two-seater I have flown the French version Alliance-34 a few times The controls of the Alliance are easier, more like a single-seater In France this glider is used for first solos The soaring performances of both are rather modest, but OK for the price Jan Waumans Belgium Great information. Thanks Jan. My club is in the same situation. We need another two seater, we prefer plastic, but can't afford an ASK-21 or even a Grob. A Schiebe SF-34 has been offered to us for a reasonable price. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "JW"
wrote: To be honest the ASK-13's fly more than the SF the cost per minute is lower, and instructors love the ASK-13 JW Our current trainer is a Blanik L-23 which serves fairly well. Previous to the Blanik we used a Ka-7. We considered importing one or more ASK-13's back when the dollar was strong. Great ship but, alas, many Americans are now too heavy and/or too tall to fit in either the Ka-7 or ASK-13. We have a number of members who barely fit in the Blanik. Luckily, we have an instructor who is relatively light. Maybe flight instructors should resemble jockeys! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd let the memories fade....I've flown the SF34 it was Schiebes attempt at
getting into the K21 Grob Twin market... IMHO it's just not a terrific glider..in many ways it's like comparing the K13 to the Bergfalkes....some of our German friends might help us out here but I've heard them explain it like this, The K13's (and most K gliders) Fly like you feel.....the Schiebe Gliders...."do things in the air"....... Construction is fair to not so fair....design is just missing something, crude by current standards, it's essentially a 15 meter glass two seater..Performance is probably a tad better than the K13's but don't expect much over 30-1 regardless of the brochures... tim Wings & Wheels www.wingsandwheels.com "Wallace Berry" wrote in message ... I'm looking for information on the Schiebe/Alliance SF-34. Would any of our German or French brothers care to comment on the suitability of the SF-34 as a club training glider? Handling qualities, comfort, durability, soaring performance? To my knowledge, there are only two examples of this glider in the U.S. I flew one of them many years ago and my memory of the experience is fading. Thanks, Wallace |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Tim Mara" wrote: I'd let the memories fade....I've flown the SF34 it was Schiebes attempt at getting into the K21 Grob Twin market... IMHO it's just not a terrific glider..in many ways it's like comparing the K13 to the Bergfalkes....some of our German friends might help us out here but I've heard them explain it like this, The K13's (and most K gliders) Fly like you feel.....the Schiebe Gliders...."do things in the air"....... Construction is fair to not so fair....design is just missing something, crude by current standards, it's essentially a 15 meter glass two seater..Performance is probably a tad better than the K13's but don't expect much over 30-1 regardless of the brochures... tim Wings & Wheels www.wingsandwheels.com Others have told me the same thing about Schiebe gliders, that they just don't handle that well. However, I've heard that the SF-25 is not bad. My memory of the SF-34 was that it was somewhat rudimentary compared to the Grob or ASK-21. My admittedly imperfect memory of the control feel, was that it handled somewhat like a 2 seat 1-26, if that makes any sense. I seem to remember that I liked the handling better than the Grob. I definitely remember that my fingers got pinched against the cockpit side when I actuated the divebrakes. I also remember quite well that it would spin fairly easily, but would also recover easily. About 30:1 is what I would expect considering the usual relationship between claimed and actual performance. It's hard to find any decent 2 seaters in the U.S. right now. Even tired old L-13's are hard to come by at a reasonable price. The PW-6 looks like a good trainer, but with the dollar weak, even that is too expensive. Howsabout talking HPH into building a 2 seat equivalent to the 304c? Speaking of Glasflugels: What ever happened to that 2 place side-by-side Glasflugel design? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a fair amount of time in the back seat of the SF-34. From a
CFI's, (at least this CFI), point of view, it's easier to fly than the G103 in that the controls are more haromonized and it does well in weak lift. At speeds above about seventy knots it seems to out run, (albeit slowly), the G103. The useful load is better as most 103's in this country have less useful load by virtue of their age and damage history. From a student or at least a front seat point of view, there is a bit less foot room than the 103 as the nose is more pointed. The SF-34 ground handles better than the 103 because of the manner in which it is so easily balance on the main wheel. There is quite a lot of room in the back seat and I even need some extra cushions, (I'm 5' 10") in order to reach the stick in it's full forward position. There are only two in the US that I know of and the one I've been flying is at the Moriarty airport in NM. All-in-all, the SF-34 is a lot of bang for the buck. Regards, Billy Hill |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
The build quality of the scheibe SF34s is very *variable* There has been one case in the UK where the rear fuselage failed in flight (but fortunately didn't quite fall off) Not sure if there are any details available on the BGA website The SF also has less span than a K21 or Grob so I'm surprised at those who say it climbs better in weak lift |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wallace Berry wrote:
.....snip... Great ship but, alas, many Americans are now too heavy and/or too tall to fit in either the Ka-7 or ASK-13. We have a number of members who barely fit in the Blanik. Luckily, we have an instructor who is relatively light. Maybe flight instructors should resemble jockeys! We've found this to be an increasing problem. We have two K13s. One has had the front panel cut away at the bottom and it is the only one that a number of taller members can fit in and have proper rudder control. The young are becoming heavier, but even more are becoming taller. Our Puchacz is the best for fitting all heights but it still has the 110kg limit. Graeme Cant |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|