![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Montblack wrote: ("Newps" wrote) Or just buy a more efficient plane. I sold my 182 and got a Bonanza. I'm burning a lot less gas, approx 40%, than when I had my 182. What are the two engines? Your normal cruise speeds between the two? Curious? I wouldn't have thought that the case. Most of my flying is the local $100 hamburger run. In the 182 with the standard O-470R I usually ran top of the green, 23"/2450. That gave me about 135-140 mph indicated and burned about 12.5-13. In the Bo with the standard IO-520 I run 45% in the local area at 19"/2100 at 50 lean of peak. That will give me 150 mph indicated and burn 8 gph, so nowadays I'm burning 4.5-5 gph less and when I need or want to I can tear up the sky at 185-190 mph indicated at 15 gph. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-04-30, Montblack Y4-NOT wrote:
("Newps" wrote) Or just buy a more efficient plane. I sold my 182 and got a Bonanza. I'm burning a lot less gas, approx 40%, than when I had my 182. What are the two engines? Your normal cruise speeds between the two? The Bonanza is vastly more efficient than a C182. Our club had a 1960 C182 and a mid-60s S35 Bonanza. The C182 (IIRC) had an O-470. It would burn about 13 gph in cruise at about 135 kts (again, IIRC). The Bonanza with an IO-520 (285hp) would do 160 knots at the same fuel flow. It would also climb a lot faster, take off in less distance, and IMHO was a much nicer plane to fly. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() That's one way to to do it. Bonanza are a lot more fuel efficient than a 182. I just had a trip last weekend in my 75 AA5. 420nm buring 27.58gal of autogas, about 15.2 nmpg. That's very good for a production 4-seater. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "M" wrote in message oups.com... That's one way to to do it. Bonanza are a lot more fuel efficient than a 182. I just had a trip last weekend in my 75 AA5. 420nm buring 27.58gal of autogas, about 15.2 nmpg. That's very good for a production 4-seater. TN B36 (IO-550): 418nm (Montrose-Lincoln, NE), 185kts, 19kt tailwind, 12,500 feet, 32.5 gallons 100LL, 60 LOP; TT 2hrs 19min. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Newps" wrote
... I sold my 182 and got a Bonanza. I'm burning a lot less gas, approx 40%, than when I had my 182. Wow! Is that at the same air speed? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jon Woellhaf wrote: "Newps" wrote ... I sold my 182 and got a Bonanza. I'm burning a lot less gas, approx 40%, than when I had my 182. Wow! Is that at the same air speed? About 10 mph faster. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
Or just buy a more efficient plane. I sold my 182 and got a Bonanza. I'm burning a lot less gas, approx 40%, than when I had my 182. Amen. Would you mind talking some sense into my partner? We have a perfect opportunity to buy a F33 from a friend in the next hangar over. Pristine aircraft, casual sale (so no tax liability here in NJ), just needs some avionics work. It does 178KTAS on ~15GPH, while we burn 11GPH in the 172/180HP doing 115KTAS on a good day. Ugh. My kingdom for a little common sense. -Doug -------------------- Doug Vetter, ATP/CFI http://www.dvatp.com -------------------- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Doug Vetter wrote:
Would you mind talking some sense into my partner? We have a perfect opportunity to buy a F33 from a friend in the next hangar over. Pristine aircraft, casual sale (so no tax liability here in NJ), just needs some avionics work. It does 178KTAS on ~15GPH, while we burn 11GPH in the 172/180HP doing 115KTAS on a good day. Ugh. My kingdom for a little common sense. However, what would the difference in maintenance costs be between the 172 and the F33, and insurance...? -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a 180hp (C/S prop) C-172F with the lyc O-360 and I burn and plan
on 9 gph. Why are you at 11? I run 2300 rpm and 22". I believe that give me 9 gph. Ross Doug Vetter wrote: Newps wrote: Or just buy a more efficient plane. I sold my 182 and got a Bonanza. I'm burning a lot less gas, approx 40%, than when I had my 182. Amen. Would you mind talking some sense into my partner? We have a perfect opportunity to buy a F33 from a friend in the next hangar over. Pristine aircraft, casual sale (so no tax liability here in NJ), just needs some avionics work. It does 178KTAS on ~15GPH, while we burn 11GPH in the 172/180HP doing 115KTAS on a good day. Ugh. My kingdom for a little common sense. -Doug -------------------- Doug Vetter, ATP/CFI http://www.dvatp.com -------------------- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
M wrote:
The best "mod" you can get to make fuel cost more bearable is the autogas STC, if you're lucky enough to own a model that can get the STC, and you can get ethanol free autogas. How great is that mod when you need to get 30-40 gallons into the plane? Do you land at a gas station? G Even 20 is a lot to carry around in portable containers. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|