![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Owen Hiller wrote:
I had no idea that a flyover of the runway was illegal. I presume this may be due to 91.119, which would probably require at least 500 feet AGL if there is no intent to land? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Logajan wrote:
Owen Hiller wrote: I had no idea that a flyover of the runway was illegal. I presume this may be due to 91.119, which would probably require at least 500 feet AGL if there is no intent to land? That would be my thought, but boy that is splitting hairs. Matt |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim Logajan" wrote in message .. . : Owen Hiller wrote: : I had no idea that a flyover of the runway was illegal. : : I presume this may be due to 91.119, which would probably require at least : 500 feet AGL if there is no intent to land? That is 500' from persons or 'property'. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
".Blueskies." wrote in message . com... That is 500' from persons or 'property'. No, it's 500 feet from any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Flying over the runway may or may not be illegal, but it sure beats
the hell out of flying below the runway. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
We flew below the runway all the time in the King Air full
motion simulators at Flight Safety, even did a few spinouts. "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... | Flying over the runway may or may not be illegal, but it sure beats | the hell out of flying below the runway. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
".Blueskies." wrote in message
. com... : I presume this may be due to 91.119, which would probably require at least : 500 feet AGL if there is no intent to land? That is 500' from persons or 'property'. Unless you are flying over a sparsely populated area, it's *at least* 500' AGL. I think it's safe to say that anywhere that there's a "municipal airstrip", the FAA isn't going to consider "sparsely populated". Pete |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
come on out west.. I'll show you a municipal airport in a sparsely populated
area.. there are no homes within 7 miles, and only two hotels and a prison, all more than 1000ft from the runway B "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... ".Blueskies." wrote in message . com... : I presume this may be due to 91.119, which would probably require at least : 500 feet AGL if there is no intent to land? That is 500' from persons or 'property'. Unless you are flying over a sparsely populated area, it's *at least* 500' AGL. I think it's safe to say that anywhere that there's a "municipal airstrip", the FAA isn't going to consider "sparsely populated". Pete |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:6zeyg.16263$6w.7083@fed1read11... come on out west.. I'll show you a municipal airport in a sparsely populated area.. there are no homes within 7 miles, and only two hotels and a prison, all more than 1000ft from the runway I am "out west". And you are missing the point. There's no way that the FAA inspectors here would consider any airport with a hotel and prison nearby to be in a "sparsely populated area". And why no actual airport name in your post? You could actually "show" me the airport right here. Even if I wasn't already "out west", the Internet makes it easy. Pete |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Jim Logajan wrote: Owen Hiller wrote: I had no idea that a flyover of the runway was illegal. I presume this may be due to 91.119, which would probably require at least 500 feet AGL if there is no intent to land? Except that's not an accurate paraphrase of 91.119. JKG |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Our runway is being bulldozed! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 28 | July 23rd 06 04:02 AM |
| "Cleared Straight-In Runway X; Report Y Miles Final" | Jim Cummiskey | Piloting | 86 | August 16th 04 07:23 PM |
| Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Owning | 114 | July 22nd 04 06:40 PM |
| Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Piloting | 114 | July 22nd 04 06:40 PM |
| FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 01:07 AM |